California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 295 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 295.
You're tracking SB 295
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 295 — California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006.
Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 requires the State Air Resources Board to adopt regulations to require the reporting and verification of emissions of greenhouse gases and to monitor and enforce compliance with the reporting and verification program, and requires the state board to adopt a statewide greenhouse gas emissions limit equivalent to the statewide greenhouse gas emissions level in 1990 to be achieved by 2020. The act requires the state board to prepare and approve a scoping plan for achieving the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. The state board is required to evaluate the total potential costs and total potential economic and noneconomic benefits of the plan. The state board is required by January 1, 2011, to adopt greenhouse gas emissions limits and emission reduction measures by regulation to achieve the prescribed emission reductions. This bill would require the state board to complete a study to reevaluate the evaluation of costs discussed above, and provide this study to the Legislature by October 1, 2009. The state board would be required to report to the Legislature by November 1, 2009, on whether the revised analysis has led, or will lead, to any changes to the scoping plan, and whether any changes should be made to the act's timelines. The bill would require the Legislative Analyst to review the state board's implementation of these requirements, as provided. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/13/09 - Amended Senate Current pdf May 13, 2009
- Amended 04/27/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 27, 2009
- Amended 04/13/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 13, 2009
- Introduced 02/25/09 - Introduced pdf February 25, 2009
- SB295 View text html
Action History
-
Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Set, second hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 3. Noes 4. Page 992.) Reconsideration granted.
-
Set for hearing May 20.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on EQ.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on EQ.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on EQ.
-
Set for hearing April 20.
-
To Com. on EQ.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 28.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Runner · Cosponsor
- Cox · Cosponsor
- DeVore · Cosponsor
- Dutton · Primary
- Fuller · Cosponsor
- Hagman · Cosponsor
- Bill Berryhill · Cosponsor
- Huff · Cosponsor
- Jeffries · Cosponsor
- Silva · Cosponsor
- Roger W. Niello · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Dutton
Co-sponsors (10)
- Runner
- Cox
- DeVore
- Fuller
- Hagman
- Bill Berryhill
- Huff
- Jeffries
- Silva
- Niello, Roger W. Republican
Not signed on (111)
111 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 111 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 43% | 57% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Nay |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 295 do?
- The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 requires the State Air Resources Board to adopt regulations to require the reporting and verification of emissions of greenhouse gases and to monitor and enforce compliance with the reporting and verification program, and requires the state board to adopt a statewide greenhouse gas emissions limit equivalent to the statewide greenhouse gas emissions level in 1990 to be achieved by 2020. The act requires the state board to prepare and approve a scoping plan for achieving the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. The state board is required to evaluate the total potential costs and total potential economic and noneconomic benefits of the plan. The state board is required by January 1, 2011, to adopt greenhouse gas emissions limits and emission reduction measures by regulation to achieve the prescribed emission reductions. This bill would require the state board to complete a study to reevaluate the evaluation of costs discussed above, and provide this study to the Legislature by October 1, 2009. The state board would be required to report to the Legislature by November 1, 2009, on whether the revised analysis has led, or will lead, to any changes to the scoping plan, and whether any changes should be made to the act's timelines. The bill would require the Legislative Analyst to review the state board's implementation of these requirements, as provided. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors SB 295?
- SB 295 is sponsored by Runner, Cox, DeVore, Dutton, Fuller, Hagman, Bill Berryhill, Huff, Jeffries, Silva, and Niello, Roger W. (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 295?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 295?
- Track SB 295 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 295
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 295
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →