SCA 28 — A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by adding Section 10 to Article III thereof, relating to state audits.
Last action — From committee without further action.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing statutory law establishes the Bureau of State Audits, which is headed by the State Auditor and has specified statutory duties, including the performance of statutorily mandated audits. Existing law states that the Bureau of State Audits, in order to be free of organizational impairments to independence, shall be independent of the executive branch and legislative control. This measure would require the State Auditor to biennially conduct a performance evaluation of each state program, including the administration or oversight of that program by the department or agency that is responsible for the program, and submit a report of the results of that performance evaluation to the Legislature, as prescribed. This measure would require the committee that considers the budget in each house of the Legislature to meet and consider recommendations made in each performance evaluation within 90 days of submission by the State Auditor. This measure would require the State Auditor to make each performance evaluation available to the public on an Internet Web site and in hardcopy format and require the Legislature to appropriate to the Bureau of State Audits those funds that are necessary to implement these provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/24/10 - Amended Senate Current pdf May 24, 2010
- Amended 04/05/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 05, 2010
- Introduced 02/11/10 - Introduced pdf February 11, 2010
- SCA28 View text html
Action History
-
From committee without further action.
-
Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 2. Noes 3. Page 3861.) Reconsideration granted.
-
Set for hearing June 9.
-
Re-referred to Coms. on G.O. and E., R., & C.A.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
To Com. on RLS.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 14.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Wyland · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Wyland
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 2 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 17% | 25% | 0% | 58% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Not Voting |
| Negrete | — | Not Voting |
| McLeod | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 0% | 0% | 42% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SCA 28 do?
- Existing statutory law establishes the Bureau of State Audits, which is headed by the State Auditor and has specified statutory duties, including the performance of statutorily mandated audits. Existing law states that the Bureau of State Audits, in order to be free of organizational impairments to independence, shall be independent of the executive branch and legislative control. This measure would require the State Auditor to biennially conduct a performance evaluation of each state program, including the administration or oversight of that program by the department or agency that is responsible for the program, and submit a report of the results of that performance evaluation to the Legislature, as prescribed. This measure would require the committee that considers the budget in each house of the Legislature to meet and consider recommendations made in each performance evaluation within 90 days of submission by the State Auditor. This measure would require the State Auditor to make each performance evaluation available to the public on an Internet Web site and in hardcopy format and require the Legislature to appropriate to the Bureau of State Audits those funds that are necessary to implement these provisions.
- Who sponsors SCA 28?
- SCA 28 is sponsored by Wyland.
- What is the current status of SCA 28?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SCA 28?
- Track SCA 28 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SCA 28
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SCA 28
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →