SCA 14 — A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by amending Section 8 of Article II thereof, relating to initiatives.
Last action — Died on file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The California Constitution provides that the electors may propose statutes or amendments to the state constitution through the initiative process by presenting to the Secretary of State a petition that sets forth the text of the proposed statute or amendment to the Constitution and is certified to have been signed by a certain number of electors. This measure would prohibit an initiative measure that would result in a net increase in state or local government costs other than costs attributable to the issuance, sale, or repayment of bonds, from being submitted to the electors or having any effect unless and until the Legislative Analyst and the Director of Finance jointly determine that the initiative measure provides for additional revenues in an amount that meets or exceeds the net increase in costs.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/17/09 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 17, 2009
- Amended 06/23/09 - Amended Senate pdf June 23, 2009
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
- SCA14 View text html
Action History
-
Died on file.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From inactive file to second reading file.
-
Placed on inactive file on request of Senator Ducheny.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
(Received by Desk on August 28 pursuant to Joint Rule 61(a)(11).)
-
From committee: Be adopted. (Ayes 8. Noes 5. Page 2079.)
-
(Suspense - vote only.)
-
Set for hearing August 27.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing July 6.
-
(Corrected June 26.)
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Be adopted as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 1. Page 1319.)
-
Set for hearing June 16.
-
To Com. on E., R. & C.A.
-
Read first time.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Alquist · Cosponsor
- Ashburn · Cosponsor
- Negrete McLeod · Cosponsor
- Portantino · Cosponsor
- Saldana · Cosponsor
- DeSaulnier · Cosponsor
- Ducheny · Primary
- Evans · Cosponsor
- Florez · Cosponsor
- Hancock · Cosponsor
- Harkey · Cosponsor
- Huffman · Cosponsor
- Krekorian · Cosponsor
- Leno · Cosponsor
- Pavley · Cosponsor
- Smyth · Cosponsor
- Steinberg · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 16 co-sponsors · 105 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Ducheny
Co-sponsors (16)
- Alquist
- Ashburn
- Negrete McLeod
- Portantino
- Saldana
- DeSaulnier
- Evans
- Florez
- Hancock
- Harkey
- Huffman
- Krekorian
- Leno
- Pavley
- Smyth
- Steinberg
Not signed on (105)
105 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 105 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 38% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 20% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SCA 14 do?
- The California Constitution provides that the electors may propose statutes or amendments to the state constitution through the initiative process by presenting to the Secretary of State a petition that sets forth the text of the proposed statute or amendment to the Constitution and is certified to have been signed by a certain number of electors. This measure would prohibit an initiative measure that would result in a net increase in state or local government costs other than costs attributable to the issuance, sale, or repayment of bonds, from being submitted to the electors or having any effect unless and until the Legislative Analyst and the Director of Finance jointly determine that the initiative measure provides for additional revenues in an amount that meets or exceeds the net increase in costs.
- Who sponsors SCA 14?
- SCA 14 is sponsored by Alquist, Ashburn, Negrete McLeod, Portantino, Saldana, DeSaulnier, Ducheny, Evans, Florez, Hancock, Harkey, Huffman, Krekorian, Leno, Pavley, Smyth, and Steinberg.
- What is the current status of SCA 14?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SCA 14?
- Track SCA 14 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SCA 14
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SCA 14
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →