California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 1352 — Rape kits.

Last action — From committee without further action.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires the establishment of protocols for the examination and treatment of sexual assault victims, including the collection and preservation of evidence. Existing law provides that a law enforcement agency assigned to investigate certain sexual assault offenses should perform DNA testing of rape kit evidence in a timely manner. This bill would require rape kits collected on or after January 1, 2011, in criminal investigations be processed and analyzed for identification purposes within 30 days of delivery to law enforcement. The bill would also require that all rape kits collected prior to January 1, 2011, in criminal investigations be processed and analyzed for identification purposes not later than June 30, 2011. By imposing additional duties on local law enforcement agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions provide a procedure for paying this reimbursement. This bill would appropriate an unspecified sum to the Controller annually to reimburse local agencies and school districts for costs mandated by the state and incurred by them pursuant to this act.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee without further action.

  2. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  3. Set for hearing April 20.

  4. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  5. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  6. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  7. To Com. on RLS.

  8. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 22.

  9. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Wyland · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Wyland

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

public-safety civil-rights
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1352 do?
Existing law requires the establishment of protocols for the examination and treatment of sexual assault victims, including the collection and preservation of evidence. Existing law provides that a law enforcement agency assigned to investigate certain sexual assault offenses should perform DNA testing of rape kit evidence in a timely manner. This bill would require rape kits collected on or after January 1, 2011, in criminal investigations be processed and analyzed for identification purposes within 30 days of delivery to law enforcement. The bill would also require that all rape kits collected prior to January 1, 2011, in criminal investigations be processed and analyzed for identification purposes not later than June 30, 2011. By imposing additional duties on local law enforcement agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions provide a procedure for paying this reimbursement. This bill would appropriate an unspecified sum to the Controller annually to reimburse local agencies and school districts for costs mandated by the state and incurred by them pursuant to this act.
Who sponsors SB 1352?
SB 1352 is sponsored by Wyland.
What is the current status of SB 1352?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1352?
Track SB 1352 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1352

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 1352

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →