California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 698 — Juvenile court schools: funding.

Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law provides for the administration and operation of public schools in juvenile halls, juvenile homes, day centers, juvenile ranches, juvenile camps, regional youth educational facilities, and Orange County youth correctional centers, as specified. Existing law requires the county board of education to provide for the administration and operation of juvenile court schools either by the county superintendent of schools, as specified, or by contract with the respective governing boards of the elementary, high school, or unified school district in which the juvenile court school is located. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to compute an inflation adjusted revenue limit for juvenile court school programs operated by a county superintendent of schools. This bill would require for each reporting period the use of average daily enrollment instead of average daily attendance in computing the revenue limit for each such school. The bill would define average daily enrollment. Existing law requires a revenue limit to be calculated for each county superintendent of schools, adjusted for various factors, and reduced, as specified. Existing law reduces the revenue limit for each county superintendent of schools for the 2008–09 fiscal year by a deficit factor of 7.839%, and for the 2009–10 fiscal year by a deficit factor of 13.360%. This bill would exempt the revenue limit funding generated by pupils enrolled in juvenile court school programs from the deficit factor reduction for the 2008–09 and 2009–10 fiscal years.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Set, first hearing. Held in committee and under submission.

  3. (Suspense - for vote only.)

  4. Set for hearing May 28.

  5. Placed on APPR suspense file.

  6. Set for hearing May 11.

  7. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1. Page 728.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  8. Set for hearing April 29.

  9. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  10. Set for hearing April 22.

  11. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  12. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  13. To Com. on RLS.

  14. Read first time.

  15. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.

  16. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Negrete McLeod · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Negrete McLeod

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Leno — Yea
Runner — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Walters — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 698 do?
Existing law provides for the administration and operation of public schools in juvenile halls, juvenile homes, day centers, juvenile ranches, juvenile camps, regional youth educational facilities, and Orange County youth correctional centers, as specified. Existing law requires the county board of education to provide for the administration and operation of juvenile court schools either by the county superintendent of schools, as specified, or by contract with the respective governing boards of the elementary, high school, or unified school district in which the juvenile court school is located. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to compute an inflation adjusted revenue limit for juvenile court school programs operated by a county superintendent of schools. This bill would require for each reporting period the use of average daily enrollment instead of average daily attendance in computing the revenue limit for each such school. The bill would define average daily enrollment. Existing law requires a revenue limit to be calculated for each county superintendent of schools, adjusted for various factors, and reduced, as specified. Existing law reduces the revenue limit for each county superintendent of schools for the 2008–09 fiscal year by a deficit factor of 7.839%, and for the 2009–10 fiscal year by a deficit factor of 13.360%. This bill would exempt the revenue limit funding generated by pupils enrolled in juvenile court school programs from the deficit factor reduction for the 2008–09 and 2009–10 fiscal years.
Who sponsors SB 698?
SB 698 is sponsored by Negrete McLeod.
What is the current status of SB 698?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 698?
Track SB 698 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 698

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 698

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →