California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: In Committee 1 D cosponsors

SB 482 — Biological data analysis services: regulation.

Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of clinical laboratories and clinical laboratory personnel by the State Department of Public Health and makes a violation of these provisions a misdemeanor. Under existing law, only designated health care personnel are authorized to perform, under specified conditions, clinical laboratory tests or examinations that are classified as waived, moderate complexity, or high complexity under federal law. This bill would require an entity that provides post-CLIA bioinformatics services, as defined, to contract with a licensed clinical laboratory to process biological specimen collection kits, except as specified. The bill would require an entity that provides post-CLIA bioinformatics services to employ a specified expert for approval of the algorithms used in the interpretation of the biological data of a customer. The bill would further impose on an entity that provides post-CLIA bioinformatics services specified privacy, recordkeeping, disclosure, and audit requirements, and would impose specified duties on the State Department of Public Health in that regard. The bill would also subject those entities to specified provisions of existing law prohibiting unearned rebates, refunds, and discounts, a violation of which constitutes a crime. Because the bill would expand the scope of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  3. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 7. Noes 1. Page 675.) Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  4. Set for hearing April 27.

  5. Re-referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and RLS.

  6. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  7. To Com. on RLS.

  8. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 28.

  9. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Rules.

Passed 8 Yea · 1 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8102
Total 8102
% of votes cast 73%9%0%18%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Romero — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
McLeod — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Not Voting
Correa — Yea
Florez — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

healthcare technology
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 482 do?
Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of clinical laboratories and clinical laboratory personnel by the State Department of Public Health and makes a violation of these provisions a misdemeanor. Under existing law, only designated health care personnel are authorized to perform, under specified conditions, clinical laboratory tests or examinations that are classified as waived, moderate complexity, or high complexity under federal law. This bill would require an entity that provides post-CLIA bioinformatics services, as defined, to contract with a licensed clinical laboratory to process biological specimen collection kits, except as specified. The bill would require an entity that provides post-CLIA bioinformatics services to employ a specified expert for approval of the algorithms used in the interpretation of the biological data of a customer. The bill would further impose on an entity that provides post-CLIA bioinformatics services specified privacy, recordkeeping, disclosure, and audit requirements, and would impose specified duties on the State Department of Public Health in that regard. The bill would also subject those entities to specified provisions of existing law prohibiting unearned rebates, refunds, and discounts, a violation of which constitutes a crime. Because the bill would expand the scope of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors SB 482?
SB 482 is sponsored by Padilla, Stephen C. (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 482?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 482?
Track SB 482 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 482

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 482

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →