California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 57 — California Major Risk Medical Insurance Program: health care service plans: individual health care coverage.

Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law establishes the California Major Risk Medical Insurance Program (MRMIP) that is administered by the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board (MRMIB) to provide major risk medical coverage to residents, as defined, who, among other matters, have been rejected for coverage by at least one private health plan. Existing law authorizes MRMIB to provide that coverage through participating health plans, including health insurers and health care service plans, and authorizes MRMIB to provide or purchase stop-loss coverage under which MRMIP and participating health plans share the risk for health plan expenses that exceed plan rates. This bill would require that a person either be rejected for coverage by at least 3 different health plans or have a qualified medically uninsurable condition, as specified, in order to be eligible for MRMIP and would also revise the definition of the term "resident" for purposes of MRMIP eligibility, as specified. The bill would require MRMIB to offer at least 4 different options for major risk medical coverage, including at least one Health Savings Account-compatible option, and would authorize MRMIB to subsidize the Health Savings Account-compatible option, as specified. The bill would also authorize MRMIB, until a specified date and if sufficient funds are available, to participate in deductible and out-of-pocket maximum reinsurance using specified products. The bill would require MRMIB to release all program actuarial data for 2004 to 2007, inclusive, to the Legislative Analyst's Office, as requested by that office. Existing law specifies the minimum scope of benefits offered by participating health plans in MRMIP and requires the exclusion of benefits that exceed $75,000 in a calendar year or $750,000 in a lifetime, as specified. Existing law requires MRMIB to establish program contribution amounts for each category of risk for each participating health plan. Under existing law, the risk categories are based on age and geographic region. This bill would, until January 1, 2015, increase the annual benefit limit to $150,000 and the lifetime benefit limit to $1,000,000, and would require the board to adopt regulations eliminating the annual benefit limit if sufficient funds are available, as specified. The bill would authorize MRMIB, by regulation, to develop additional risk categories based on morbid obesity and tobacco use, as specified, and would also require MRMIB to adopt regulations that allow participating health plans to incorporate wellness programs, case management services, and disease management services, and offer enrollee rewards based on health risk reduction. The bill would require that those regulations remain in effect until January 1, 2015. Existing law creates the Major Risk Medical Insurance Fund, continuously appropriates the fund to MRMIB for purposes of MRMIP, and requires specified moneys to be deposited annually in the fund from the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Surtax Fund. This bill would increase the moneys to be deposited into the fund from the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Surtax Fund by a specified amount, thereby making an appropriation. (2) Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 (the Knox-Keene Act) , provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the Knox-Keene Act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. This bill would, commencing July 1, 2010, require each health care service plan and health insurer to add a surcharge to each life covered by an individual health plan contract or individual health insurance policy, as specified, and would require the deposit of those revenues in the Major Risk Medical Insurance Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would require the suspension of the assessment if state funds appropriated to MRMIP are less than a certain amount. The bill would require health care service plans and health insurers to report to the Department of Managed Health Care or the Department of Insurance, and MRMIB, the number of lives covered by the plan's or insurer's individual health care service plan contracts or individual health insurance policies annually, as specified. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2015. Because a willful violation of these requirements by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law prohibits health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies from excluding coverage on the basis of a preexisting condition provision for more than a specified period of time. This bill would authorize MRMIB to create a rider pool consisting of applicants with no more than 2 health conditions that made them uninsurable in the private market, as specified. The bill would authorize an individual health care service plan contract or individual health insurance policy issued to one of the rider pool members to temporarily or permanently exclude coverage for those conditions. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2015. Existing law requires a health care service plan or a health insurer offering individual plan contracts or individual insurance policies to fairly and affirmatively offer, market, and sell certain individual contracts and policies to all federally eligible defined individuals, as defined, in each service area in which the plan or insurer provides or arranges for the provision of health care services. For those contracts and policies that offer services through a preferred provider arrangement, existing law requires that the premium not exceed the average premium paid by a similar subscriber of MRMIP, as specified. For all other contracts and policies, existing law requires that the premium not exceed 170% of the standard premium charged to a similar individual, as specified. This bill would require that the premium for all contracts and policies not exceed 170% of the standard premium charged to a similar individual, as specified, regardless of whether services are offered through a preferred provider arrangement, and would make related changes. Because a willful violation of these requirements by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) This bill would result in a change in state taxes for the purpose of increasing state revenues within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

1 line(s) added, 1 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBill Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill Text PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

  2. Set, second hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 2. Noes 6. Page 728.)

  3. Set for hearing April 29.

  4. Joint Rule 62 (a), file notice suspended. (Page 647.)

  5. Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 2. Noes 5. Page 636.) Reconsideration granted.

  6. Set for hearing April 22.

  7. To Com. on HEALTH.

  8. Read first time.

  9. From print. May be acted upon on or after February 20.

  10. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Aanestad · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Aanestad

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Failed 2 Yea · 7 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 2702
Republican 0001
Total 2703
% of votes cast 17%58%0%25%
How each member voted (12)
Member Party Vote
Negrete — Nay
McLeod — Nay
Pavley — Nay
Wolk — Nay
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Nay
Leno — Nay
Maldonado — Not Voting
Cedillo — Not Voting
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Failed 2 Yea · 5 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 2504
Republican 0001
Total 2505
% of votes cast 17%42%0%42%
How each member voted (12)
Member Party Vote
Negrete — Not Voting
McLeod — Not Voting
Pavley — Nay
Wolk — Nay
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Nay
Leno — Nay
Maldonado — Not Voting
Cedillo — Not Voting
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7004
Republican 0001
Total 7005
% of votes cast 58%0%0%42%
How each member voted (12)
Member Party Vote
Cedillo — Not Voting
Negrete — Not Voting
McLeod — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 57 do?
(1) Existing law establishes the California Major Risk Medical Insurance Program (MRMIP) that is administered by the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board (MRMIB) to provide major risk medical coverage to residents, as defined, who, among other matters, have been rejected for coverage by at least one private health plan. Existing law authorizes MRMIB to provide that coverage through participating health plans, including health insurers and health care service plans, and authorizes MRMIB to provide or purchase stop-loss coverage under which MRMIP and participating health plans share the risk for health plan expenses that exceed plan rates. This bill would require that a person either be rejected for coverage by at least 3 different health plans or have a qualified medically uninsurable condition, as specified, in order to be eligible for MRMIP and would also revise the definition of the term "resident" for purposes of MRMIP eligibility, as specified. The bill would require MRMIB to offer at least 4 different options for major risk medical coverage, including at least one Health Savings Account-compatible option, and would authorize MRMIB to subsidize the Health Savings Account-compatible option, as specified. The bill would also authorize MRMIB, until a specified date and if sufficient funds are available, to participate in deductible and out-of-pocket maximum reinsurance using specified products. The bill would require MRMIB to release all program actuarial data for 2004 to 2007, inclusive, to the Legislative Analyst's Office, as requested by that office. Existing law specifies the minimum scope of benefits offered by participating health plans in MRMIP and requires the exclusion of benefits that exceed $75,000 in a calendar year or $750,000 in a lifetime, as specified. Existing law requires MRMIB to establish program contribution amounts for each category of risk for each participating health plan. Under existing law, the risk categories are based on age and geographic region. This bill would, until January 1, 2015, increase the annual benefit limit to $150,000 and the lifetime benefit limit to $1,000,000, and would require the board to adopt regulations eliminating the annual benefit limit if sufficient funds are available, as specified. The bill would authorize MRMIB, by regulation, to develop additional risk categories based on morbid obesity and tobacco use, as specified, and would also require MRMIB to adopt regulations that allow participating health plans to incorporate wellness programs, case management services, and disease management services, and offer enrollee rewards based on health risk reduction. The bill would require that those regulations remain in effect until January 1, 2015. Existing law creates the Major Risk Medical Insurance Fund, continuously appropriates the fund to MRMIB for purposes of MRMIP, and requires specified moneys to be deposited annually in the fund from the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Surtax Fund. This bill would increase the moneys to be deposited into the fund from the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Surtax Fund by a specified amount, thereby making an appropriation. (2) Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 (the Knox-Keene Act) , provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the Knox-Keene Act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. This bill would, commencing July 1, 2010, require each health care service plan and health insurer to add a surcharge to each life covered by an individual health plan contract or individual health insurance policy, as specified, and would require the deposit of those revenues in the Major Risk Medical Insurance Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would require the suspension of the assessment if state funds appropriated to MRMIP are less than a certain amount. The bill would require health care service plans and health insurers to report to the Department of Managed Health Care or the Department of Insurance, and MRMIB, the number of lives covered by the plan's or insurer's individual health care service plan contracts or individual health insurance policies annually, as specified. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2015. Because a willful violation of these requirements by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law prohibits health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies from excluding coverage on the basis of a preexisting condition provision for more than a specified period of time. This bill would authorize MRMIB to create a rider pool consisting of applicants with no more than 2 health conditions that made them uninsurable in the private market, as specified. The bill would authorize an individual health care service plan contract or individual health insurance policy issued to one of the rider pool members to temporarily or permanently exclude coverage for those conditions. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2015. Existing law requires a health care service plan or a health insurer offering individual plan contracts or individual insurance policies to fairly and affirmatively offer, market, and sell certain individual contracts and policies to all federally eligible defined individuals, as defined, in each service area in which the plan or insurer provides or arranges for the provision of health care services. For those contracts and policies that offer services through a preferred provider arrangement, existing law requires that the premium not exceed the average premium paid by a similar subscriber of MRMIP, as specified. For all other contracts and policies, existing law requires that the premium not exceed 170% of the standard premium charged to a similar individual, as specified. This bill would require that the premium for all contracts and policies not exceed 170% of the standard premium charged to a similar individual, as specified, regardless of whether services are offered through a preferred provider arrangement, and would make related changes. Because a willful violation of these requirements by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) This bill would result in a change in state taxes for the purpose of increasing state revenues within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors SB 57?
SB 57 is sponsored by Aanestad.
What is the current status of SB 57?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 57?
Track SB 57 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 57

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 57

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →