California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 2316 — State Highway Route 710: alternative transportation improvement program.

Last action — From committee without further action.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law generally provides that a city or county acting jointly with the transportation planning agency having jurisdiction may adopt a resolution requesting the rescission of a state highway route location within the city or county, and submit an alternative state highway project proposal. Existing law provides that the route location shall be rescinded if the California Transportation Commission concurs in the resolution, and in that case provides for the Department of Transportation to proceed with the sale of excess properties that were acquired for the rescinded route location. However, in the case of a city or county under the jurisdiction of a county transportation commission in those counties subject to the County Transportation Commission Act, only the county transportation commission may adopt the resolution and submit an alternative state highway project proposal. Existing law requires the California Transportation Commission to allocate the proceeds from the sale of properties from a rescinded state highway route location to fund the alternative state highway project if the project is approved by the commission. These funds are not subject to allocation pursuant to the north-south split and county shares formulas otherwise generally applicable to state highway funds if the expenditure for an alternative project is within the same county as the rescinded route location. This bill would require proceeds from the sale of the excess properties within a specified portion of the State Highway Route 710 corridor, less any reimbursements due to the federal government and all costs incurred in the sale of those properties, to be allocated by the commission to fund a transportation improvement program approved by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. These funds would not be subject to allocation pursuant to the north-south split and county shares formulas.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee without further action.

  2. In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  3. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  4. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.

  5. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.

  6. Referred to Com. on TRANS.

  7. Read first time.

  8. From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  9. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Eng · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Eng

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

transportation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2316 do?
Existing law generally provides that a city or county acting jointly with the transportation planning agency having jurisdiction may adopt a resolution requesting the rescission of a state highway route location within the city or county, and submit an alternative state highway project proposal. Existing law provides that the route location shall be rescinded if the California Transportation Commission concurs in the resolution, and in that case provides for the Department of Transportation to proceed with the sale of excess properties that were acquired for the rescinded route location. However, in the case of a city or county under the jurisdiction of a county transportation commission in those counties subject to the County Transportation Commission Act, only the county transportation commission may adopt the resolution and submit an alternative state highway project proposal. Existing law requires the California Transportation Commission to allocate the proceeds from the sale of properties from a rescinded state highway route location to fund the alternative state highway project if the project is approved by the commission. These funds are not subject to allocation pursuant to the north-south split and county shares formulas otherwise generally applicable to state highway funds if the expenditure for an alternative project is within the same county as the rescinded route location. This bill would require proceeds from the sale of the excess properties within a specified portion of the State Highway Route 710 corridor, less any reimbursements due to the federal government and all costs incurred in the sale of those properties, to be allocated by the commission to fund a transportation improvement program approved by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. These funds would not be subject to allocation pursuant to the north-south split and county shares formulas.
Who sponsors AB 2316?
AB 2316 is sponsored by Eng.
What is the current status of AB 2316?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2316?
Track AB 2316 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2316

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 2316

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →