Injunctive Authority Clarification Act of 2025
HR 97 is a proposed bill introduced in the House that focuses on reforms within the judicial system. It seeks to improve the functioning and effectiveness of judicial processes.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HR 97 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HR 97.
You're tracking HR 97
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HR 97 — Injunctive Authority Clarification Act of 2025
Last action — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced January 03, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
5 sponsors
1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (5 R).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
HR 97 aims to address legislative reforms in the judiciary.
HR 97 is a proposed bill introduced in the House that focuses on reforms within the judicial system. It seeks to improve the functioning and effectiveness of judicial processes.
Summary
Injunctive Authority Clarification Act of 2025 This bill prohibits federal courts from issuing injunctive orders that bar enforcement of a federal law or policy against a nonparty, unless the nonparty is represented by a party in a class action lawsuit.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced in House Current html January 03, 2025
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill prohibits U.S. courts from issuing national injunctions against non-parties and includes a clerical amendment to the table of sections.
-
28 U.S.C. 2285
No court of the United States (and no district court of the Virgin Islands, Guam, or the Northern Mariana Islands) shall issue an order that purports to restrain the enforcement against a non-party of any statute, regulation, order, or similar authority, unless the non-party is represented by a party acting in a representative capacity pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This establishes that U.S. courts cannot issue injunctions against non-parties unless they are represented by a party.
-
28 U.S.C. 155
2285. Orders purporting to restrain enforcement against non-parties.
This adds a new section to the table of sections for chapter 155, referencing the new injunction limits.
Action History
-
Introduced in House
-
Introduced in House
-
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsors
- Randy K. Sr. Weber · Cosponsor
- Andrew Ogles · Cosponsor
- Lauren Boebert · Cosponsor
- Scott Perry · Cosponsor
- Andy Biggs · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 542 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Biggs, Andy Republican
Co-sponsors (4)
- Weber, Randy K. Sr. Republican
- Ogles, Andrew Republican
- Boebert, Lauren Republican
- Perry, Scott Republican
Not signed on (542)
542 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 542 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HR 97 do?
- Injunctive Authority Clarification Act of 2025 This bill prohibits federal courts from issuing injunctive orders that bar enforcement of a federal law or policy against a nonparty, unless the nonparty is represented by a party in a class action lawsuit.
- Who sponsors HR 97?
- HR 97 is sponsored by Weber, Randy K. Sr. (Republican), Ogles, Andrew (Republican), Boebert, Lauren (Republican), Perry, Scott (Republican), and Biggs, Andy (Republican).
- What is the current status of HR 97?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced January 03, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HR 97?
- Track HR 97 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 97
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 97
Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →