Sales and use taxes: consumer: destination management company.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1687 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1687.
You're tracking AB 1687
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1687 — Sales and use taxes: consumer: destination management company.
Last action — From committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Sales and Use Tax Law imposes a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state. That law, with certain exceptions, defines a retailer as a seller that makes any retail sale of tangible personal property and as a person that makes more than 2 retail sales of tangible personal property during any 12-month period, and defines a retail sale as a sale of tangible personal property for any purpose other than resale in the regular course of business. This bill would provide, until January 1, 2016, that a qualified destination management company, as defined, is a consumer, and not a retailer, of tangible personal property it provides to its clients pursuant to a qualified contract, as defined, for destination management services, so that the sale of the tangible personal property to the destination management company is the retail sale subject to tax. The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes counties and cities to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law, and the Transactions and Use Tax Law authorizes districts, as specified, to impose transactions and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law. Exemptions from state sales and use taxes are incorporated in these taxes. Section 2230 of the Revenue and Taxation Code provides that the state will reimburse counties and cities for revenue losses caused by the enactment of sales and use tax exemptions. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2230 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for sales and use tax revenues lost by them pursuant to this bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy, but its operative date would depend on its effective date.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/20/10 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 20, 2010
- Introduced 01/26/10 - Introduced pdf January 26, 2010
- AB1687 View text html
Action History
-
From committee without further action.
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 10).
-
Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to REV. & TAX. suspense file.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 26.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Jeffries · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Jeffries
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1687 do?
- The Sales and Use Tax Law imposes a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state. That law, with certain exceptions, defines a retailer as a seller that makes any retail sale of tangible personal property and as a person that makes more than 2 retail sales of tangible personal property during any 12-month period, and defines a retail sale as a sale of tangible personal property for any purpose other than resale in the regular course of business. This bill would provide, until January 1, 2016, that a qualified destination management company, as defined, is a consumer, and not a retailer, of tangible personal property it provides to its clients pursuant to a qualified contract, as defined, for destination management services, so that the sale of the tangible personal property to the destination management company is the retail sale subject to tax. The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes counties and cities to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law, and the Transactions and Use Tax Law authorizes districts, as specified, to impose transactions and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law. Exemptions from state sales and use taxes are incorporated in these taxes. Section 2230 of the Revenue and Taxation Code provides that the state will reimburse counties and cities for revenue losses caused by the enactment of sales and use tax exemptions. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2230 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for sales and use tax revenues lost by them pursuant to this bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy, but its operative date would depend on its effective date.
- Who sponsors AB 1687?
- AB 1687 is sponsored by Jeffries.
- What is the current status of AB 1687?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1687?
- Track AB 1687 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1687
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1687
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →