California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 2113 — Local taxation: personal income taxes: vehicle license fees.

Last action — From committee without further action.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law authorizes various local governmental entities to impose local taxes for various purposes. This bill would authorize the board of supervisors of any county or city and county, by ordinance, to propose to the voters either a local personal income tax or a local vehicle license fee, or both, in accordance with specified requirements. This bill would require the Department of Motor Vehicles to administer the local vehicle license fee, and would require, prior to the operative date of any ordinance imposing a local vehicle license fee, the county or city and county to contract with the Department of Motor Vehicles to perform this function. This bill would require the county or city and county to reimburse the Department of Motor Vehicles pursuant to the contract. This bill would require the revenues derived from the local vehicle license fee to be deposited in the State Treasury to the credit of the Local Vehicle License Fee Account, which this bill would create. This bill would continuously appropriate those moneys to the Controller for allocation to each county and city and county in which the local vehicle license fee is imposed. This bill would allow the local vehicle license fee to be deducted from the tax imposed under Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, and would require the county or city and county to reimburse the General Fund for these losses, as provided. This bill would require the Franchise Tax Board to administer the local personal income tax, and would require, prior to the operative date of any ordinance imposing a local personal income tax, the county or city and county to contract with the Franchise Tax Board and the Employment Development Department to perform their functions. This bill would require the county or city and county to reimburse the Franchise Tax Board and the Employment Development Department pursuant to these contracts. This bill would require the Franchise Tax Board to permit the county or city and county to examine personal income tax records, as provided. This bill would authorize the Franchise Tax Board to adopt regulations necessary to administer the local personal income tax. This bill would require the revenues derived from the local personal income tax to be deposited in the State Treasury to the credit of the Local Personal Income Tax Account, which this bill would create. This bill would continuously appropriate those moneys to the Controller for allocation to each county and city and county in which the local personal income tax is imposed. (2) Existing law requires the Franchise Tax Board to prepare wage withholding tables to be used by employers for purposes of withholding state personal income taxes on wages paid. This bill would require the Franchise Tax Board to prepare wage withholding tables to be used by employers for purposes of withholding both state personal income taxes and local personal income taxes on wages paid. (3) Existing law requires an employer who pays wages to a resident employee for services performed within or without this state to withhold from those wages, except as provided, specified state personal income taxes. This bill would require an employer who pays wages to a resident employee to withhold from those wages both state personal income taxes and local personal income taxes.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

1 line(s) added, 1 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBill Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill Text PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. From committee without further action.

  2. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  3. Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and REV. & TAX.

  4. From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.

  5. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Evans · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Evans

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2113 do?
(1) Existing law authorizes various local governmental entities to impose local taxes for various purposes. This bill would authorize the board of supervisors of any county or city and county, by ordinance, to propose to the voters either a local personal income tax or a local vehicle license fee, or both, in accordance with specified requirements. This bill would require the Department of Motor Vehicles to administer the local vehicle license fee, and would require, prior to the operative date of any ordinance imposing a local vehicle license fee, the county or city and county to contract with the Department of Motor Vehicles to perform this function. This bill would require the county or city and county to reimburse the Department of Motor Vehicles pursuant to the contract. This bill would require the revenues derived from the local vehicle license fee to be deposited in the State Treasury to the credit of the Local Vehicle License Fee Account, which this bill would create. This bill would continuously appropriate those moneys to the Controller for allocation to each county and city and county in which the local vehicle license fee is imposed. This bill would allow the local vehicle license fee to be deducted from the tax imposed under Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, and would require the county or city and county to reimburse the General Fund for these losses, as provided. This bill would require the Franchise Tax Board to administer the local personal income tax, and would require, prior to the operative date of any ordinance imposing a local personal income tax, the county or city and county to contract with the Franchise Tax Board and the Employment Development Department to perform their functions. This bill would require the county or city and county to reimburse the Franchise Tax Board and the Employment Development Department pursuant to these contracts. This bill would require the Franchise Tax Board to permit the county or city and county to examine personal income tax records, as provided. This bill would authorize the Franchise Tax Board to adopt regulations necessary to administer the local personal income tax. This bill would require the revenues derived from the local personal income tax to be deposited in the State Treasury to the credit of the Local Personal Income Tax Account, which this bill would create. This bill would continuously appropriate those moneys to the Controller for allocation to each county and city and county in which the local personal income tax is imposed. (2) Existing law requires the Franchise Tax Board to prepare wage withholding tables to be used by employers for purposes of withholding state personal income taxes on wages paid. This bill would require the Franchise Tax Board to prepare wage withholding tables to be used by employers for purposes of withholding both state personal income taxes and local personal income taxes on wages paid. (3) Existing law requires an employer who pays wages to a resident employee for services performed within or without this state to withhold from those wages, except as provided, specified state personal income taxes. This bill would require an employer who pays wages to a resident employee to withhold from those wages both state personal income taxes and local personal income taxes.
Who sponsors AB 2113?
AB 2113 is sponsored by Evans.
What is the current status of AB 2113?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2113?
Track AB 2113 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2113

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2113

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →