California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Introduced

AB 1786 — Dependent children: review hearings.

Last action — Died at Desk.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires the court to hold a permanency hearing 12 months after a child enters foster care, and at that hearing, the court is required to determine the permanent plan for that child. Existing law, commencing July 1, 2010, and continuing until January 1, 2014, provides that if a juvenile court orders a permanent plan of adoption, tribal customary adoption, or legal guardianship, that the court retains jurisdiction over the child until the child is adopted or the legal guardianship is established, except as provided. Existing law provides that following establishment of a legal guardianship, the court is authorized to continue jurisdiction over the child as a dependent of the juvenile court or terminate its dependency jurisdiction and retain jurisdiction over the child as a ward of the legal guardianship. This bill would make a technical, nonsubstantive change to that provision.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

1 line(s) added, 1 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBill Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill Text PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Died at Desk.

  2. From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.

  3. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Galgiani · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Galgiani

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1786 do?
Existing law requires the court to hold a permanency hearing 12 months after a child enters foster care, and at that hearing, the court is required to determine the permanent plan for that child. Existing law, commencing July 1, 2010, and continuing until January 1, 2014, provides that if a juvenile court orders a permanent plan of adoption, tribal customary adoption, or legal guardianship, that the court retains jurisdiction over the child until the child is adopted or the legal guardianship is established, except as provided. Existing law provides that following establishment of a legal guardianship, the court is authorized to continue jurisdiction over the child as a dependent of the juvenile court or terminate its dependency jurisdiction and retain jurisdiction over the child as a ward of the legal guardianship. This bill would make a technical, nonsubstantive change to that provision.
Who sponsors AB 1786?
AB 1786 is sponsored by Galgiani.
What is the current status of AB 1786?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1786?
Track AB 1786 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1786

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1786

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →