Elections: ballot titles.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 319 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 319.
You're tracking AB 319
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 319 — Elections: ballot titles.
Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires the Attorney General, upon receipt of a draft of a petition for a proposed initiative or referendum, to prepare a title and summary of the proposed measure. Under existing law, the Attorney General is required to determine the effect of a proposed initiative measure on revenues and expenditures of the state or local government. If the Attorney General determines that a proposed measure would affect state or local revenues or expenditures, he or she must include in the title either the estimate of the amount of change in state or local revenues or costs or an opinion as to whether a substantial net change in state or local finances would result if the proposed initiative is adopted. Existing law requires the Department of Finance and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee to prepare jointly the fiscal estimate that is included in the title. This bill would require the Legislative Analyst, instead of the Attorney General, to prepare the ballot title and summary for all measures submitted to the voters of the state and would require the Legislative Analyst, instead of the Department of Finance and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, to prepare any fiscal estimate or opinion required by a proposed initiative measure. The bill would make its operation contingent upon the approval by the voters of ACA 20 of the 2009–10 Regular Session.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/13/09 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 13, 2009
- Introduced 02/18/09 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2009
- AB319 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
-
In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
-
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E. & R. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Adams · Cosponsor
- Runner · Cosponsor
- Cox · Cosponsor
- Denham · Cosponsor
- DeVore · Cosponsor
- Harkey · Cosponsor
- Harman · Cosponsor
- Huff · Cosponsor
- Jeffries · Cosponsor
- Knight · Cosponsor
- Niello · Primary
- Smyth · Cosponsor
- Bill Berryhill · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 12 co-sponsors · 109 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Niello
Co-sponsors (12)
- Adams
- Runner
- Cox
- Denham
- DeVore
- Harkey
- Harman
- Huff
- Jeffries
- Knight
- Smyth
- Bill Berryhill
Not signed on (109)
109 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 109 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 38% | 63% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Nay |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 319 do?
- Existing law requires the Attorney General, upon receipt of a draft of a petition for a proposed initiative or referendum, to prepare a title and summary of the proposed measure. Under existing law, the Attorney General is required to determine the effect of a proposed initiative measure on revenues and expenditures of the state or local government. If the Attorney General determines that a proposed measure would affect state or local revenues or expenditures, he or she must include in the title either the estimate of the amount of change in state or local revenues or costs or an opinion as to whether a substantial net change in state or local finances would result if the proposed initiative is adopted. Existing law requires the Department of Finance and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee to prepare jointly the fiscal estimate that is included in the title. This bill would require the Legislative Analyst, instead of the Attorney General, to prepare the ballot title and summary for all measures submitted to the voters of the state and would require the Legislative Analyst, instead of the Department of Finance and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, to prepare any fiscal estimate or opinion required by a proposed initiative measure. The bill would make its operation contingent upon the approval by the voters of ACA 20 of the 2009–10 Regular Session.
- Who sponsors AB 319?
- AB 319 is sponsored by Adams, Runner, Cox, Denham, DeVore, Harkey, Harman, Huff, Jeffries, Knight, Niello, Smyth, and Bill Berryhill.
- What is the current status of AB 319?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 319?
- Track AB 319 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 319
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 319
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →