California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 462 — Public postsecondary education: systemwide fees: limitations: tax levy.

Last action — From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) The Donahoe Higher Education Act sets forth, among other things, the missions and functions of California's public and independent segments of higher education and their respective institutions of higher education. The act establishes the California State University, under the administration of the Trustees of the California State University, and the University of California, under the administration of the Regents of the University of California, as 2 of the segments of public postsecondary education in this state. The act provides that it applies to the University of California only to the extent that the regents act, by resolution, to make it applicable. This bill would establish the College Affordability Act of 2009. The bill would limit, notwithstanding any law and commencing with the 2010–11 fiscal year, the systemwide tuition and fees charged to resident undergraduate students at the California State University and the University of California to those in effect during the 2009–10 academic year. Commencing with the 2015–16 fiscal year, the bill would limit any increase in statewide tuition and fees to the annual percentage change in the California Consumer Price Index for the prior year. The bill would apply to the University of California only if the regents, by resolution, make it applicable. The bill would create the College Affordability Funding Accountability Panel. The panel would be required to annually review the expenditure of funds received pursuant to the tax created in (2) and provide an accountability update to the public that would be posted on the California State University and University of California Internet Web sites. (2) The Personal Income Tax Law provides for specified treatment and calculations with respect to the taxation of the income of residents, nonresidents, and part-year residents. This bill would, in addition, for each taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2010, impose an additional tax at the rate of 1% on that portion of a taxpayer's taxable income in excess of $1,000,000. Revenue from the additional tax would be deposited in the General Fund. Sixty percent of these revenues would be credited to the College Affordability Fund, which the bill would create. The bill would continuously appropriate the money in that fund to the California State University and the University of California. The bill would require that the funds be used to offset increased costs of educating resident undergraduate students attending the California State University and the University of California thereby mitigating the need for increases in student tuition and fees. In the event that the provisions of the bill would not apply to the University of California, the bill would require the California State University to receive all of the revenues that would have been allocated to the University of California. This bill would provide that its provisions are severable. (3) This bill would result in a change in state taxes for the purpose of increasing state revenues within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

1 line(s) added, 1 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBill Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill Text PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

  2. In committee: Set, second hearing. Failed passage.

  3. In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

  4. Referred to Coms. on HIGHER ED. and REV. & TAX.

  5. From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.

  6. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Price · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Price

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 462 do?
(1) The Donahoe Higher Education Act sets forth, among other things, the missions and functions of California's public and independent segments of higher education and their respective institutions of higher education. The act establishes the California State University, under the administration of the Trustees of the California State University, and the University of California, under the administration of the Regents of the University of California, as 2 of the segments of public postsecondary education in this state. The act provides that it applies to the University of California only to the extent that the regents act, by resolution, to make it applicable. This bill would establish the College Affordability Act of 2009. The bill would limit, notwithstanding any law and commencing with the 2010–11 fiscal year, the systemwide tuition and fees charged to resident undergraduate students at the California State University and the University of California to those in effect during the 2009–10 academic year. Commencing with the 2015–16 fiscal year, the bill would limit any increase in statewide tuition and fees to the annual percentage change in the California Consumer Price Index for the prior year. The bill would apply to the University of California only if the regents, by resolution, make it applicable. The bill would create the College Affordability Funding Accountability Panel. The panel would be required to annually review the expenditure of funds received pursuant to the tax created in (2) and provide an accountability update to the public that would be posted on the California State University and University of California Internet Web sites. (2) The Personal Income Tax Law provides for specified treatment and calculations with respect to the taxation of the income of residents, nonresidents, and part-year residents. This bill would, in addition, for each taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2010, impose an additional tax at the rate of 1% on that portion of a taxpayer's taxable income in excess of $1,000,000. Revenue from the additional tax would be deposited in the General Fund. Sixty percent of these revenues would be credited to the College Affordability Fund, which the bill would create. The bill would continuously appropriate the money in that fund to the California State University and the University of California. The bill would require that the funds be used to offset increased costs of educating resident undergraduate students attending the California State University and the University of California thereby mitigating the need for increases in student tuition and fees. In the event that the provisions of the bill would not apply to the University of California, the bill would require the California State University to receive all of the revenues that would have been allocated to the University of California. This bill would provide that its provisions are severable. (3) This bill would result in a change in state taxes for the purpose of increasing state revenues within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Who sponsors AB 462?
AB 462 is sponsored by Price.
What is the current status of AB 462?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 462?
Track AB 462 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 462

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 462

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →