County employees: health benefit system.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 628 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 628.
You're tracking SB 628
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 628 — County employees: health benefit system.
Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) provides that an employee or annuitant is eligible to enroll in an approved health benefit plan, as specified. PEMHCA authorizes a contracting agency, as specified, to elect to become subject to the act, along with the agency's employees and annuitants. Existing law establishes certain minimum rates for contracting employer contributions in this regard and requires that the employer contribution be equal for both employees and annuitants. This bill would permit a contracting agency of PEMHCA, that is an instrumentality of either Placer County or Shasta County, and the exclusive representative of employees of that agency to agree through collective bargaining that the employer contribution for employee and annuitant health benefits coverage for employees first hired on or after the effective date of a memorandum of understanding may differ from the employer contribution provided to existing employees and annuitants. The bill would provide that these provisions are not subject to labor negotiation impasse procedures. The bill would require a contracting agency that applies a different contribution rate to employees not represented by a bargaining unit to certify that, with regard to those employees, there is not an applicable memorandum of understanding. The bill would provide that an agreement reached in this regard is not valid if it provides an employer contribution for employees with less than five years of credited service with the contracting agency. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Counties of Placer and Shasta.
Bill Text
- Amended 01/07/10 - Amended Senate Current pdf January 07, 2010
- Amended 04/22/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 22, 2009
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
- SB628 View text html
Action History
-
Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
-
Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 2. Noes 4. Page 2673.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
-
Set for hearing January 11.
-
Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 2. Noes 4. Page 685.) Reconsideration granted.
-
Set for hearing April 27.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
-
To Com. on P.E. & R.
-
Read first time.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Ashburn · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Ashburn
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Corbett | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Ducheny | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 29% | 57% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Liu | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Nay |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 628 do?
- The Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) provides that an employee or annuitant is eligible to enroll in an approved health benefit plan, as specified. PEMHCA authorizes a contracting agency, as specified, to elect to become subject to the act, along with the agency's employees and annuitants. Existing law establishes certain minimum rates for contracting employer contributions in this regard and requires that the employer contribution be equal for both employees and annuitants. This bill would permit a contracting agency of PEMHCA, that is an instrumentality of either Placer County or Shasta County, and the exclusive representative of employees of that agency to agree through collective bargaining that the employer contribution for employee and annuitant health benefits coverage for employees first hired on or after the effective date of a memorandum of understanding may differ from the employer contribution provided to existing employees and annuitants. The bill would provide that these provisions are not subject to labor negotiation impasse procedures. The bill would require a contracting agency that applies a different contribution rate to employees not represented by a bargaining unit to certify that, with regard to those employees, there is not an applicable memorandum of understanding. The bill would provide that an agreement reached in this regard is not valid if it provides an employer contribution for employees with less than five years of credited service with the contracting agency. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Counties of Placer and Shasta.
- Who sponsors SB 628?
- SB 628 is sponsored by Ashburn.
- What is the current status of SB 628?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 628?
- Track SB 628 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 628
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 628
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →