California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 1408 — Subdivisions: Water Demand Mitigation Fund.

Last action — Died on inactive file.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) The Subdivision Map Act establishes a statewide regulatory framework for controlling the subdividing of land. The act generally requires a subdivider to submit, and have approved by the city, county, or city and county in which the land is situated, a tentative map. The act requires the legislative body of a city or county or the advisory agency, to the extent that it is authorized by local ordinance to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the tentative map, to include as a condition in any tentative map that includes a subdivision a requirement that a sufficient water supply be available. The act authorizes the legislative body to request written verification of sufficient water supply, and, when the written verification relies on projected water supplies that are not currently available to the public water system to provide a sufficient water supply to the subdivision, requires that the written verification as to those projected water supplies be based on prescribed elements. This bill would, instead, require the legislative body of a city or county or the advisory agency, to the extent that it is authorized by local ordinance to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the tentative map, to include as a condition in any tentative map that includes a subdivision a requirement that the subdivision have a sufficient water supply available or that sufficient water supplies will be made available through a Water Demand Mitigation Fund, as defined, held by the public water system. The bill would require the amount of funding needed for voluntary participation by the subdivision applicant in the Water Demand Mitigation Fund to be based on offsetting at least 100 percent of the projected water demand associated with the subdivision, as determined by the public water system. The bill would authorize the public water supplier to collect fees necessary to provide additional analysis of extraordinary water conservation measures. The bill also would require the public water system to expend all funds in the Water Demand Mitigation Fund on water conservation measures that will offset at least 100 percent of the projected demand associated with the subdivision, as specified. By adding to the duties of public water system officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Died on inactive file.

  2. (Corrected October 23.)

  3. To inactive file on motion of Assembly Member Krekorian.

  4. Reconsideration granted. (Page 2048.)

  5. Motion to reconsider made by Assembly Member Krekorian.

  6. Read third time, passage refused. (Ayes 34. Noes 32. Page 1995.)

  7. Read second time. To third reading.

  8. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 5.) (May 28).

  9. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  10. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. Read second time and amended.

  12. From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 4.) (April 28).

  13. Re-referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.

  14. Read second time and amended.

  15. From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on W.,P. & W. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 22).

  16. Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and W.,P. & W.

  17. Read first time.

  18. From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.

  19. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Hancock · Cosponsor
  • Krekorian · Primary
  • Skinner · Cosponsor
  • Torlakson · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Krekorian

Co-sponsors (3)

  • Hancock
  • Skinner
  • Torlakson

Not signed on (118)

118 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 118 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 1408 KREKORIAN Assembly Third Reading

Failed 40 Yea · 34 Nay · 18 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 3831017
Democratic 1101
Republican 1200
Total 4034018
% of votes cast 43%37%0%20%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Not Voting
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Coto — Yea
Evans — Yea
Furutani — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Conway — Nay
Tom — Nay
Fuentes — Not Voting
Galgiani — Nay
Gilmore — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Audra — Nay
Bill — Not Voting
Hagman — Nay
Charles — Not Voting
Harkey — Nay
V. — Not Voting
Manuel — Not Voting
Perez — Not Voting
Portantino — Not Voting
Salas — Not Voting
Cook — Nay
Hernandez — Not Voting
Huber — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Bass — Yea
Davis — Not Voting
Duvall — Nay
Knight — Nay
Mendoza — Nay
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Price — Not Voting
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Tran — Nay
Villines — Nay
Adams — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
Block — Not Voting
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Logue — Nay
Ma — Not Voting
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Solorio — Not Voting
Torres — Not Voting
Torrico — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 13 Yea · 6 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13502
Republican 0100
Democratic 0001
Total 13603
% of votes cast 59%27%0%14%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Nay
Charles — Not Voting
Fuentes — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Krekorian — Yea
Miller — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Duvall — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Not Voting
Ammiano — Yea
Price — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Passed 11 Yea · 5 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 3000
Unaffiliated 8501
Total 11501
% of votes cast 65%29%0%6%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bonnie — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Tom — Nay
Berryhill — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Krekorian — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Yamada — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

housing environment
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1408 do?
(1) The Subdivision Map Act establishes a statewide regulatory framework for controlling the subdividing of land. The act generally requires a subdivider to submit, and have approved by the city, county, or city and county in which the land is situated, a tentative map. The act requires the legislative body of a city or county or the advisory agency, to the extent that it is authorized by local ordinance to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the tentative map, to include as a condition in any tentative map that includes a subdivision a requirement that a sufficient water supply be available. The act authorizes the legislative body to request written verification of sufficient water supply, and, when the written verification relies on projected water supplies that are not currently available to the public water system to provide a sufficient water supply to the subdivision, requires that the written verification as to those projected water supplies be based on prescribed elements. This bill would, instead, require the legislative body of a city or county or the advisory agency, to the extent that it is authorized by local ordinance to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the tentative map, to include as a condition in any tentative map that includes a subdivision a requirement that the subdivision have a sufficient water supply available or that sufficient water supplies will be made available through a Water Demand Mitigation Fund, as defined, held by the public water system. The bill would require the amount of funding needed for voluntary participation by the subdivision applicant in the Water Demand Mitigation Fund to be based on offsetting at least 100 percent of the projected water demand associated with the subdivision, as determined by the public water system. The bill would authorize the public water supplier to collect fees necessary to provide additional analysis of extraordinary water conservation measures. The bill also would require the public water system to expend all funds in the Water Demand Mitigation Fund on water conservation measures that will offset at least 100 percent of the projected demand associated with the subdivision, as specified. By adding to the duties of public water system officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 1408?
AB 1408 is sponsored by Hancock, Krekorian, Skinner, and Torlakson.
What is the current status of AB 1408?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1408?
Track AB 1408 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1408

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1408

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →