California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 946 — Employment: temporary service employee wages.

Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires that an employee of a temporary services employer, as defined, be paid weekly. Existing law requires that an employee of a temporary services employer be paid at the end of the workday if the employee is assigned to a client of the temporary service employer, as defined, on a day-to-day basis or if the employee is assigned to a client engaged in a trade dispute. Existing law provides that these pay requirements do not apply to an employee of a temporary service employer who is assigned to a client for over 90 consecutive calendar days unless the temporary service employer pays the employee weekly. A violation of these provisions is punishable as a misdemeanor. This bill would provide that the pay requirements would not apply to an employee of a temporary service employer who is assigned to a client for over 91 consecutive calendar days unless the temporary service employer pays the employee weekly. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

  3. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  4. Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.

  5. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. Read second time and amended.

  6. Referred to Com. on L. & E.

  7. From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.

  8. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Salas · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Salas

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 946 do?
Existing law requires that an employee of a temporary services employer, as defined, be paid weekly. Existing law requires that an employee of a temporary services employer be paid at the end of the workday if the employee is assigned to a client of the temporary service employer, as defined, on a day-to-day basis or if the employee is assigned to a client engaged in a trade dispute. Existing law provides that these pay requirements do not apply to an employee of a temporary service employer who is assigned to a client for over 90 consecutive calendar days unless the temporary service employer pays the employee weekly. A violation of these provisions is punishable as a misdemeanor. This bill would provide that the pay requirements would not apply to an employee of a temporary service employer who is assigned to a client for over 91 consecutive calendar days unless the temporary service employer pays the employee weekly. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 946?
AB 946 is sponsored by Salas.
What is the current status of AB 946?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 946?
Track AB 946 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 946

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 946

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →