ACA 10 — A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by amending Section 4 of Article XIII A thereof, by amending Section 2 of Article XIII C thereof, and by amending Section 3 of Article XIII D thereof, relating to taxation.
Last action — Died on third reading file.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The California Constitution conditions the imposition, extension, or increase of a special tax by a city, county, or special district upon the approval of 23 of the voters of the city, county, or special district voting on that tax, and prohibits these entities from imposing an ad valorem tax on real property or a transactions or sales tax on the sale of real property. This measure would instead condition the imposition, extension, or increase of a special tax by a school district upon the approval of a majority of the voters of the district voting on that tax, and would also make conforming changes to related provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/05/10 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 05, 2010
- Introduced 02/11/09 - Introduced pdf February 11, 2009
- ACA10 View text html
Action History
-
Died on third reading file.
-
Read third time, amended, and returned to third reading. (Page 4448.).
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Be adopted. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Be adopted, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 3.) (May 11).
-
Referred to Coms. on REV. & TAX. and APPR.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 14.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Huffman · Cosponsor
- Torlakson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Torlakson
Co-sponsors (1)
- Huffman
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 30% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Not Voting |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does ACA 10 do?
- The California Constitution conditions the imposition, extension, or increase of a special tax by a city, county, or special district upon the approval of 23 of the voters of the city, county, or special district voting on that tax, and prohibits these entities from imposing an ad valorem tax on real property or a transactions or sales tax on the sale of real property. This measure would instead condition the imposition, extension, or increase of a special tax by a school district upon the approval of a majority of the voters of the district voting on that tax, and would also make conforming changes to related provisions.
- Who sponsors ACA 10?
- ACA 10 is sponsored by Huffman and Torlakson.
- What is the current status of ACA 10?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track ACA 10?
- Track ACA 10 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on ACA 10
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of ACA 10
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →