California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 72 — State employees: payroll: health care.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 340, Statutes of 2009.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law requires that, on and after January 1, 2010, payments to employees made through the Uniform State Payroll System for a pay period ending on June 30 of each year shall be on or after July 1, provided that employees, in any event, be paid promptly. This bill would require that, on and after January 1, 2010, payments to employees made through the Uniform State Payroll System for a master payroll paid on June 30 of each year shall be issue dated on July 1. (2) Existing law requires the Department of Finance to install and supervise an accounting system for state agencies. Existing law requires, in regard to this system, that the payments to employees made in July through the Uniform State Payroll System for services rendered prior to July 1 of each year are to be considered payables incurred in the fiscal year in which the warrant is issued. This bill would provide that payments to employees made through the Uniform State Payroll System, as specified, with an issue date each year of July 1 shall be considered payables incurred in the fiscal year in which the payment is issue dated. (3) Existing law authorizes the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System to use reserves generated by one or more self-funded health benefit plans to reduce the premiums charged for enrollment in one or more separate self-funded health benefit plans offered by the board, as specified. This bill would make technical changes to that section.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 340, Statutes of 2009.

  2. Approved by Governor.

  3. Enrolled. To Governor at 11 a.m.

  4. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 21. Noes 14. Page 2366.) To enrollment.

  5. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 63. Noes 9. Page 3072.) To Senate.

  7. Read third time. Amended. (Page 3039.) To third reading.

  8. From inactive file to third reading file.

  9. Notice of motion to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Krekorian.

  10. Placed on inactive file on request of Assembly Member Krekorian.

  11. Read second time. To third reading.

  12. Placed on second reading file.

  13. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  14. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 14. Page 512.) To Assembly.

  15. Read second time. To third reading.

  16. Placed on second reading file.

  17. Withdrawn from committee.

  18. To Com. on RLS.

  19. Read first time.

  20. From print. May be acted upon on or after February 20.

  21. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 22 Yea · 14 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 201305
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 221405
% of votes cast 54%34%0%12%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Cedillo — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hollingsworth — Nay
Runner — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Correa — Not Voting
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Leno — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Benoit — Nay
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Harman — Nay
Huff — Nay
Liu — Yea
Maldonado — Not Voting
Romero — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 73 Yea · 10 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 68908
Democratic 3000
Republican 2100
Total 731008
% of votes cast 80%11%0%9%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
A. — Yea
Carter — Yea
Eng — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Tom — Yea
Evans — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Charles — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Davis — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Nay
Bill — Not Voting
Fletcher — Not Voting
Conway — Not Voting
Duvall — Nay
Garrick — Not Voting
Hagman — Not Voting
Huber — Not Voting
Miller — Nay
Nestande — Not Voting
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Yea
Adams — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Villines — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Feuer — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 23 Yea · 14 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211302
Democratic 2001
Republican 0100
Total 231403
% of votes cast 58%35%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Cedillo — Not Voting
Negrete — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Nay
Huff — Nay
Runner — Nay
Ducheny — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Benoit — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Oropeza — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Maldonado — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 72 do?
(1) Existing law requires that, on and after January 1, 2010, payments to employees made through the Uniform State Payroll System for a pay period ending on June 30 of each year shall be on or after July 1, provided that employees, in any event, be paid promptly. This bill would require that, on and after January 1, 2010, payments to employees made through the Uniform State Payroll System for a master payroll paid on June 30 of each year shall be issue dated on July 1. (2) Existing law requires the Department of Finance to install and supervise an accounting system for state agencies. Existing law requires, in regard to this system, that the payments to employees made in July through the Uniform State Payroll System for services rendered prior to July 1 of each year are to be considered payables incurred in the fiscal year in which the warrant is issued. This bill would provide that payments to employees made through the Uniform State Payroll System, as specified, with an issue date each year of July 1 shall be considered payables incurred in the fiscal year in which the payment is issue dated. (3) Existing law authorizes the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System to use reserves generated by one or more self-funded health benefit plans to reduce the premiums charged for enrollment in one or more separate self-funded health benefit plans offered by the board, as specified. This bill would make technical changes to that section.
Who sponsors SB 72?
SB 72 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
What is the current status of SB 72?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 72?
Track SB 72 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 72

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 72

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →