AB 660 — Sprinkler fitters: licensing.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Office of the State Fire Marshal for specified purposes and requires the Governor to appoint the State Fire Marshal. Existing law requires the State Fire Marshal to adopt and administer regulations and building standards he or she deems necessary in order to, among other things, establish and control a program for servicing, testing, and maintaining all automatic fire extinguishing systems, including fire sprinkler systems. The Contractors' State License Law provides for the licensing and regulation of contractors by the Contractors' State License Board. Under that law, the registrar may refuse to issue, reinstate, reactivate, or renew a license or may suspend a license for the failure of a licensee to resolve all outstanding final liabilities, which include taxes, additions to tax, penalties, interest, and any fees that may be assessed by the board or other specified state agencies. This bill would include the assessments of the State Fire Marshal among the liabilities for which a license may be affected for nonpayment. This bill would enact a comprehensive program for the certification and regulation of sprinkler fitters, as defined, by the State Fire Marshal. The bill would prohibit a person from performing work on any fire suppression system, as defined, unless he or she possesses a valid sprinkler fitter or limited scope sprinkler fitter certificate issued by the State Fire Marshal, and would prohibit a person or entity from employing a person to perform work on a fire suppression system without such a certificate. The bill would provide for the issuance of, and would set forth eligibility standards for, various certificates and permits, and would require the State Fire Marshal to adopt a schedule of fees in amounts necessary to cover the cost of administering and enforcing these provisions. This bill would provide for the enforcement of these provisions by the State Fire Marshal, and would require the State Fire Marshal to revoke or suspend a certificate or permit, or reprimand a certificate holder or permitholder, for specified reasons. The bill would also provide that a person licensed under the Contractors' State License Law who violates these provisions would be subject to disciplinary action by the Contractors' State License Board. A knowing and willful violation of these licensing and regulatory provisions would be a misdemeanor. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/30/10 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 30, 2010
- Amended 08/24/09 - Amended Senate pdf August 24, 2009
- Amended 06/26/09 - Amended Senate pdf June 26, 2009
- Amended 06/17/09 - Amended Senate pdf June 17, 2009
- Introduced 02/25/09 - Introduced pdf February 25, 2009
- AB660 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Referred to APPR suspense file.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (June 23).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on G.O.
-
Referred to Coms. on G.O. and PUB. S.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 30. Page 1882.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 4.) (April 28).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. Re-referred. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (April 22).
-
Referred to Coms. on G.O. and B. & P.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 28.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Torrico · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Torrico
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 21% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Nay |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 54 | 31 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 58 | 33 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 36% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 31% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 12 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 20% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 660 do?
- Existing law establishes the Office of the State Fire Marshal for specified purposes and requires the Governor to appoint the State Fire Marshal. Existing law requires the State Fire Marshal to adopt and administer regulations and building standards he or she deems necessary in order to, among other things, establish and control a program for servicing, testing, and maintaining all automatic fire extinguishing systems, including fire sprinkler systems. The Contractors' State License Law provides for the licensing and regulation of contractors by the Contractors' State License Board. Under that law, the registrar may refuse to issue, reinstate, reactivate, or renew a license or may suspend a license for the failure of a licensee to resolve all outstanding final liabilities, which include taxes, additions to tax, penalties, interest, and any fees that may be assessed by the board or other specified state agencies. This bill would include the assessments of the State Fire Marshal among the liabilities for which a license may be affected for nonpayment. This bill would enact a comprehensive program for the certification and regulation of sprinkler fitters, as defined, by the State Fire Marshal. The bill would prohibit a person from performing work on any fire suppression system, as defined, unless he or she possesses a valid sprinkler fitter or limited scope sprinkler fitter certificate issued by the State Fire Marshal, and would prohibit a person or entity from employing a person to perform work on a fire suppression system without such a certificate. The bill would provide for the issuance of, and would set forth eligibility standards for, various certificates and permits, and would require the State Fire Marshal to adopt a schedule of fees in amounts necessary to cover the cost of administering and enforcing these provisions. This bill would provide for the enforcement of these provisions by the State Fire Marshal, and would require the State Fire Marshal to revoke or suspend a certificate or permit, or reprimand a certificate holder or permitholder, for specified reasons. The bill would also provide that a person licensed under the Contractors' State License Law who violates these provisions would be subject to disciplinary action by the Contractors' State License Board. A knowing and willful violation of these licensing and regulatory provisions would be a misdemeanor. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 660?
- AB 660 is sponsored by Torrico.
- What is the current status of AB 660?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 660?
- Track AB 660 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 660
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 660
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →