Crime laboratories: oversight.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1691 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1691.
You're tracking AB 1691
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1691 — Crime laboratories: oversight.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires the Department of Justice to establish and chair a task force known as the Crime Laboratory Review Task Force to review and make recommendations as to how best to configure, fund, and improve the delivery of state and local crime laboratory services in the future and to report its findings to the Department of Finance and specified legislative committees by July 1, 2009. This bill would require the task force to submit to the Legislature a supplemental report, by July 1, 2011, that includes a proposal to establish a statewide body to oversee crime laboratories, as specified.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/16/10 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 16, 2010
- Amended 06/29/10 - Amended Senate pdf June 29, 2010
- Amended 03/23/10 - Amended Assembly pdf March 23, 2010
- Introduced 01/27/10 - Introduced pdf January 27, 2010
- AB1691 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
-
Read third time, amended. To second reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 23).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 48. Noes 28. Page 4446.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (March 16).
-
Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 27.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Ammiano · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Ammiano
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 22% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 53 | 29 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 56 | 31 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 34% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Charles | — | Not Voting |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Not Voting |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Not Voting |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 13% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1691 do?
- Existing law requires the Department of Justice to establish and chair a task force known as the Crime Laboratory Review Task Force to review and make recommendations as to how best to configure, fund, and improve the delivery of state and local crime laboratory services in the future and to report its findings to the Department of Finance and specified legislative committees by July 1, 2009. This bill would require the task force to submit to the Legislature a supplemental report, by July 1, 2011, that includes a proposal to establish a statewide body to oversee crime laboratories, as specified.
- Who sponsors AB 1691?
- AB 1691 is sponsored by Ammiano.
- What is the current status of AB 1691?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1691?
- Track AB 1691 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1691
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1691
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →