California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 1019 — Subdivisions: release of performance security.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 174, Statutes of 2010.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

The Subdivision Map Act and local ordinances authorize or require, under specified circumstances, the furnishing of specified types of security with respect to the performance of various acts or agreements subject to the act. Existing law, until January 1, 2011, also sets forth the specific procedures imposed on a local agency for the complete or partial release of a performance security furnished by a subdivider. This bill would extend the repeal date of the provisions relating to the procedures for releasing a performance security, from January 1, 2011, to January 1, 2016, thereby extending their operation and imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 174, Statutes of 2010.

  2. Approved by Governor.

  3. Enrolled. To Governor at 11 a.m.

  4. In Senate. To enrollment.

  5. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 71. Noes 0. Page 6054.) To Senate.

  6. Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

  7. (Heard in committee on June 30).

  8. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)

  9. (Heard in Committee on June 16.)

  10. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. To Com. on L. GOV.

  12. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  13. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 31. Noes 0. Page 3411.) To Assembly.

  14. Read second time. Amended. To third reading.

  15. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3334.)

  16. Set for hearing April 26.

  17. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3102.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  18. Set for hearing April 7.

  19. To Com. on L. GOV.

  20. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 14.

  21. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Correa · Primary
  • Knight · Cosponsor
  • Price · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Correa

Co-sponsors (2)

  • Knight
  • Price

Not signed on (119)

119 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 119 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 81 Yea · 0 Nay · 10 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 750010
Democratic 3000
Republican 3000
Total 810010
% of votes cast 89%0%0%11%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Bill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Charles — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Hagman — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Hall — Yea
Fong — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bass — Yea
Beall — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huber — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Fletcher — Not Voting
V. — Not Voting
Manuel — Not Voting
Perez — Not Voting
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Blakeslee — Not Voting
Lieu — Not Voting
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Norby — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Smyth — Not Voting
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Yea
Villines — Yea
Adams — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Not Voting
Knight — Yea
Ma — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Evans — Yea
Davis — Not Voting
Yamada — Yea
Furutani — Not Voting
Gatto — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 19 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 18000
Democratic 1000
Total 19000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Gatto — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Norby — Yea
Conway — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 32 Yea · 0 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 31005
Republican 1000
Democratic 0002
Total 32007
% of votes cast 82%0%0%18%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Not Voting
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Not Voting
Ashburn — Yea
Liu — Yea
Romero — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wiggins — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Not Voting
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Not Voting
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9002
Total 9002
% of votes cast 82%0%0%18%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Walters — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Leno — Yea
Price — Yea
Cox — Yea
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1019 do?
The Subdivision Map Act and local ordinances authorize or require, under specified circumstances, the furnishing of specified types of security with respect to the performance of various acts or agreements subject to the act. Existing law, until January 1, 2011, also sets forth the specific procedures imposed on a local agency for the complete or partial release of a performance security furnished by a subdivider. This bill would extend the repeal date of the provisions relating to the procedures for releasing a performance security, from January 1, 2011, to January 1, 2016, thereby extending their operation and imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors SB 1019?
SB 1019 is sponsored by Correa, Knight, and Price.
What is the current status of SB 1019?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1019?
Track SB 1019 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1019

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1019

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →