Subdivisions: release of performance security.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1019 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1019.
You're tracking SB 1019
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1019 — Subdivisions: release of performance security.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 174, Statutes of 2010.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Subdivision Map Act and local ordinances authorize or require, under specified circumstances, the furnishing of specified types of security with respect to the performance of various acts or agreements subject to the act. Existing law, until January 1, 2011, also sets forth the specific procedures imposed on a local agency for the complete or partial release of a performance security furnished by a subdivider. This bill would extend the repeal date of the provisions relating to the procedures for releasing a performance security, from January 1, 2011, to January 1, 2016, thereby extending their operation and imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 08/23/10 - Chaptered Current pdf August 23, 2010
- Enrolled 08/06/10 - Enrolled pdf August 06, 2010
- Amended 04/29/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 29, 2010
- Introduced 02/11/10 - Introduced pdf February 11, 2010
- SB1019 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 174, Statutes of 2010.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 11 a.m.
-
In Senate. To enrollment.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 71. Noes 0. Page 6054.) To Senate.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
(Heard in committee on June 30).
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
-
(Heard in Committee on June 16.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
To Com. on L. GOV.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 31. Noes 0. Page 3411.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3334.)
-
Set for hearing April 26.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3102.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 7.
-
To Com. on L. GOV.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 14.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Correa · Primary
- Knight · Cosponsor
- Price · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Correa
Co-sponsors (2)
- Knight
- Price
Not signed on (119)
119 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 119 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 75 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 81 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| V. | — | Not Voting |
| Manuel | — | Not Voting |
| Perez | — | Not Voting |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Not Voting |
| Lieu | — | Not Voting |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Not Voting |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 32 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Not Voting |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Not Voting |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Price | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1019 do?
- The Subdivision Map Act and local ordinances authorize or require, under specified circumstances, the furnishing of specified types of security with respect to the performance of various acts or agreements subject to the act. Existing law, until January 1, 2011, also sets forth the specific procedures imposed on a local agency for the complete or partial release of a performance security furnished by a subdivider. This bill would extend the repeal date of the provisions relating to the procedures for releasing a performance security, from January 1, 2011, to January 1, 2016, thereby extending their operation and imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors SB 1019?
- SB 1019 is sponsored by Correa, Knight, and Price.
- What is the current status of SB 1019?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1019?
- Track SB 1019 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1019
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1019
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →