SB 674 — Healing arts.

Summary

(1) Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of various healing arts practitioners and requires certain of those practitioners to use particular designations following their names in specified instances. Existing law provides that it is unlawful for healing arts licensees to disseminate or cause to be disseminated any form of public communication, as defined, containing a false, fraudulent, misleading, or deceptive statement, claim, or image to induce the rendering of services or the furnishing of products relating to a professional practice or business for which he or she is licensed. Existing law authorizes advertising by these healing arts licensees to include certain general information. A violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. This bill would require certain healing arts licensees to include in advertisements, as defined, certain words or designations following their names indicating the particular educational degree they hold or healing art they practice, as specified. By changing the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law requires the Medical Board of California, in conjunction with the Board of Registered Nursing, and in consultation with the Physician Assistant Committee and professionals in the field, to review issues and problems relating to the use of laser or intense light pulse devices for elective cosmetic procedures by their respective licensees. This bill would require the board to adopt regulations by January 1, 2011, regarding the appropriate level of physician availability needed within clinics or other settings using certain laser or intense pulse light devices for elective cosmetic procedures. (3) Existing law requires the Medical Board of California to post on the Internet specified information regarding licensed physicians and surgeons. This bill would require the board to post on its Internet Web site an easy-to-understand factsheet to educate the public about cosmetic surgery and procedures, as specified. (4) Existing law requires the Medical Board of California, as successor to the Division of Licensing of the Medical Board of California, to adopt standards for accreditation of outpatient settings, as defined, and, in approving accreditation agencies to perform this accreditation, to ensure that the certification program shall, at a minimum, include standards for specified aspects of the settings' operations. Existing law makes a willful violation of these and other provisions relating to outpatient settings a crime. This bill would include, among those specified aspects, the submission for approval by an accreditation agency at the time of accreditation, a detailed plan, standardized procedures, and protocols to be followed in the event of serious complications or side effects from surgery. The bill would also modify the definition of "outpatient setting" to include facilities that offer in vitro fertilization, as defined. Existing law also requires the Medical Board of California to obtain and maintain a list of all accredited, certified, and licensed outpatient settings, and to notify the public, upon inquiry, whether a setting is accredited, certified, or licensed, or whether the setting's accreditation, certification, or license has been revoked. This bill would require the board, absent inquiry, to notify the public whether a setting is accredited, certified, or licensed, or the setting's accreditation, certification, or license has been revoked, suspended, or placed on probation, or the setting has received a reprimand by the accreditation agency. Existing law requires accreditation of an outpatient setting to be denied if the setting does not meet specified standards. Existing law authorizes an outpatient setting to reapply for accreditation at any time after receiving notification of the denial. This bill would require the accreditation agency to immediately report to the Medical Board of California if the outpatient setting's certificate for accreditation has been denied. Because a willful violation of this requirement would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law authorizes the Medical Board of California, as successor to the Division of Medical Quality of the Medical Board of California, or an accreditation agency to, upon reasonable prior notice and presentation of proper identification, enter and inspect any accredited outpatient setting to ensure compliance with, or investigate an alleged violation of, any standard of the accreditation agency or any provision of the specified law. This bill would delete the notice and identification requirements. The bill would require that every outpatient setting that is accredited be inspected by the accreditation agency, as specified, and would specify that it may also be inspected by the board, as specified. The bill would require the board to ensure that accreditation agencies inspect outpatient settings. Existing law authorizes the Medical Board of California to terminate approval of an accreditation agency if the agency is not meeting the criteria set by the board. This bill would also authorize the board to issue a citation to the agency, including an administrative fine, in accordance with a specified system established by the board. Existing law authorizes the Medical Board of California to evaluate the performance of an approved accreditation agency no less than every 3 years, or in response to complaints against an agency, or complaints against one or more outpatient settings accreditation by an agency that indicates noncompliance by the agency with the standards approved by the board. This bill would make that evaluation mandatory. (5) Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of health facilities by the State Department of Public Health and requires the department to periodically inspect those facilities, as specified. This bill would state the intent of the Legislature that the department, as part of its periodic inspections of acute care hospitals, inspect the peer review process utilized by those hospitals. (6) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

• Enrolled 09/10/09 - Enrolled Current pdf September 10, 2009
• Amended 08/17/09 - Amended Assembly pdf August 17, 2009
• Amended 07/23/09 - Amended Assembly pdf July 23, 2009
• Amended 06/01/09 - Amended Senate pdf June 01, 2009
• Amended 05/20/09 - Amended Senate pdf May 20, 2009
• Amended 04/28/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 28, 2009
• Amended 04/02/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 02, 2009
• Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
• SB674 View text html

Action History

1. January 19, 2010

   Stricken from Senate file.

2. October 11, 2009

   In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)

3. October 11, 2009

   Vetoed by Governor.

4. September 25, 2009

   Enrolled. To Governor at 1 p.m.

5. September 08, 2009

   Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 38. Noes 1. Page 2288.) To enrollment.

6. September 03, 2009

   In Senate. To unfinished business.

7. September 02, 2009

   Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2888.) To Senate.

8. August 24, 2009

   Read second time. To third reading.

9. August 20, 2009

   (Heard in committee on August 19.)

10. August 20, 2009

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)

11. August 17, 2009

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

12. July 23, 2009

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

13. July 08, 2009

    (Heard in committee on July 7.)

14. July 08, 2009

    From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

15. June 30, 2009

    (Heard in committee on June 30.)

16. June 30, 2009

    From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

17. June 18, 2009

    To Coms. on B. & P. and HEALTH.

18. June 03, 2009

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

19. June 03, 2009

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 31. Noes 2. Page 1183.) To Assembly.

20. June 01, 2009

    Read second time. Amended. To third reading.

21. June 01, 2009

    From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 1074.)

22. May 22, 2009

    (Suspense - for vote only.)

23. May 22, 2009

    Set for hearing May 28.

24. May 20, 2009

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

25. May 04, 2009

    Placed on APPR suspense file.

26. April 28, 2009

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

27. April 24, 2009

    Set for hearing May 4.

28. April 23, 2009

    Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

29. April 22, 2009

    Set for hearing April 27.

30. April 21, 2009

    From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 581.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

31. April 02, 2009

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.

32. March 27, 2009

    Set for hearing April 20.

33. March 19, 2009

    To Com. on B., P. & E.D.

34. March 02, 2009

    Read first time.

35. February 28, 2009

    From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.

36. February 27, 2009

    Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

• Negrete McLeod · Primary

Votes

Subjects