Marriage.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 906 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 906.
You're tracking SB 906
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 906 — Marriage.
Last action — Died on file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law defines marriage as a personal relation arising out of a civil contract between a man and a woman, to which the consent of the parties capable of making that contract is necessary. This bill would instead define the term civil marriage as a personal relation arising out of a civil contract between a man and a woman, established pursuant to a State of California marriage license issued by the county clerk, to which the consent of the parties capable of making that contract is necessary. The bill would also make conforming related changes by changing certain references to marriage to civil marriage. Existing law enumerates persons who are authorized to solemnize a marriage, including, but not limited to, any priest, minister, rabbi, or authorized person of any religious denomination. The bill would specify that no priest, minister, rabbi, or authorized person of any religious denomination, or his or her religious denomination, would be required to solemnize a marriage that is contrary to the tenets of his, her, or its faith. The bill would state that any refusal to solemnize a marriage under that provision shall not affect the tax exempt status of any entity.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 08/27/10 - Enrolled Current pdf August 27, 2010
- Amended 07/01/10 - Amended Assembly pdf July 01, 2010
- Amended 04/15/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 15, 2010
- Introduced 01/27/10 - Introduced pdf January 27, 2010
- SB906 View text html
Action History
-
Died on file.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
-
Vetoed by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 11:45 a.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 23. Noes 11. Page 4883.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 51. Noes 26. Page 6400.) To Senate.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read second time. Amended. To second reading.
-
(Heard in committee on June 22.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.)
-
To Com. on JUD.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 23. Noes 11. Page 3621.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read third time. Amended. To second reading.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 3001.)
-
Set for hearing March 23.
-
To Com. on JUD.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after February 27.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Ammiano · Cosponsor
- Saldana · Cosponsor
- Feuer · Cosponsor
- Kehoe · Cosponsor
- Leno · Primary
- Monning · Cosponsor
- Pavley · Cosponsor
- Price · Cosponsor
- Steinberg · Cosponsor
- Brian W. Jones · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 112 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Leno
Co-sponsors (9)
- Ammiano
- Saldana
- Feuer
- Kehoe
- Monning
- Pavley
- Price
- Steinberg
- Jones, Brian W. Republican
Not signed on (112)
112 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 112 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 10 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 11 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 28% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Hollingsworth | — | Not Voting |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Not Voting |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 56 | 27 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 60 | 29 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 66% | 32% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 30% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Saldana | — | Not Voting |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 10 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 11 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 28% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Cox | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 906 do?
- Existing law defines marriage as a personal relation arising out of a civil contract between a man and a woman, to which the consent of the parties capable of making that contract is necessary. This bill would instead define the term civil marriage as a personal relation arising out of a civil contract between a man and a woman, established pursuant to a State of California marriage license issued by the county clerk, to which the consent of the parties capable of making that contract is necessary. The bill would also make conforming related changes by changing certain references to marriage to civil marriage. Existing law enumerates persons who are authorized to solemnize a marriage, including, but not limited to, any priest, minister, rabbi, or authorized person of any religious denomination. The bill would specify that no priest, minister, rabbi, or authorized person of any religious denomination, or his or her religious denomination, would be required to solemnize a marriage that is contrary to the tenets of his, her, or its faith. The bill would state that any refusal to solemnize a marriage under that provision shall not affect the tax exempt status of any entity.
- Who sponsors SB 906?
- SB 906 is sponsored by Ammiano, Saldana, Feuer, Kehoe, Leno, Monning, Pavley, Price, Steinberg, and Jones, Brian W. (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 906?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 906?
- Track SB 906 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 906
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 906
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →