California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 956 — Workforce development: California School Paraprofessional Teacher Training Program.

Last action — From Assembly without further action.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires the Employment Development Department to implement and administer California's unemployment insurance compensation program, and to oversee various job, information and training programs in the state. The federal Workforce Investment Act of 1998 makes funding available to states that offer training and workforce development services through the state and local workforce investment boards. The California Workforce Investment Board, which is the entity responsible for assisting the Governor in the development, oversight, and continuous improvement of California's workforce investment system, is required to recommend strategies to the Governor for strategic training investments of certain discretionary funding made available under the federal Workforce Investment Act of 1998. This bill would require the department, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to allocate $5,000,000 of the Workforce Investment Act state reserve, as provided for by federal law, to school districts, county offices of education, or charter schools, on a competitive basis, to provide intensive examination preparation courses for the purpose of retraining laid off and out-of-field teachers to meet subject matter competency requirements, in accordance with specified procedures.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Assembly without further action.

  2. From committee without further action.

  3. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  4. To Coms. on L. & E. and ED.

  5. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 21. Noes 13. Page 3732.) To Assembly.

  7. Read second time. Amended. To third reading.

  8. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 3669.)

  9. (Suspense - for vote only.)

  10. Set for hearing May 27.

  11. Placed on APPR suspense file.

  12. Set for hearing May 3.

  13. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  14. Set for hearing April 26.

  15. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  16. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3182.)

  17. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  18. Set for hearing April 14.

  19. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  20. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 2937.)

  21. Set for hearing March 10.

  22. To Coms. on L. & I.R. and ED.

  23. Read first time.

  24. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 8.

  25. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Alquist · Cosponsor
  • Oropeza · Cosponsor
  • Romero · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Romero

Co-sponsors (2)

  • Alquist
  • Oropeza

Not signed on (119)

119 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 119 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 22 Yea · 13 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211203
Republican 0100
Democratic 1001
Total 221304
% of votes cast 56%33%0%10%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Cedillo — Yea
Florez — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Runner — Nay
McLeod — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Nay
Ducheny — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Not Voting
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Aanestad — Nay
Harman — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Liu — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 7 Yea · 3 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7301
Total 7301
% of votes cast 64%27%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Wyland — Nay
Yee — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Price — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Cox — Not Voting
Denham — Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10001
Total 10001
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Alquist — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Leno — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Cox — Yea
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 956 do?
Existing law requires the Employment Development Department to implement and administer California's unemployment insurance compensation program, and to oversee various job, information and training programs in the state. The federal Workforce Investment Act of 1998 makes funding available to states that offer training and workforce development services through the state and local workforce investment boards. The California Workforce Investment Board, which is the entity responsible for assisting the Governor in the development, oversight, and continuous improvement of California's workforce investment system, is required to recommend strategies to the Governor for strategic training investments of certain discretionary funding made available under the federal Workforce Investment Act of 1998. This bill would require the department, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to allocate $5,000,000 of the Workforce Investment Act state reserve, as provided for by federal law, to school districts, county offices of education, or charter schools, on a competitive basis, to provide intensive examination preparation courses for the purpose of retraining laid off and out-of-field teachers to meet subject matter competency requirements, in accordance with specified procedures.
Who sponsors SB 956?
SB 956 is sponsored by Alquist, Oropeza, and Romero.
What is the current status of SB 956?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 956?
Track SB 956 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 956

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 956

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →