AB 992 — Advertising: residential property taxes: assessment appeal application filing services.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 496, Statutes of 2009.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2009. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law provides that certain advertising related practices are unlawful and makes a violation of those provisions a crime. Existing law makes it unlawful for a person to make any untrue or misleading statements in any manner in connection with the offering or performance of an assessment appeal application filing service, which is defined as any service performed or offered to be performed for compensation in connection with an application for reduction in assessment of residential property, as specified. Existing law exempts from the definition of an assessment appeal application filing service any service performed by a person who actively advocates, in person or by written and oral communications, on behalf of the person to whom a solicitation is made before the assessment appeals board or the assessor's office. This bill would recast these provisions to instead make them applicable to an assessment reduction filing service, which would be defined as any service performed or offered to be performed for compensation in connection with an application or request of any kind of reduction in assessment of residential property, as specified, or to provide comparable sales information in connection with such an application or request. The bill would delete the exemption in the definition of an assessment appeal application filing service and thereby include in the definition of an assessment reduction filing service those services performed by a person who actively advocates, in person or by written and oral communications, on behalf of the person to whom a solicitation is made before the assessment appeals board or the assessor's office. The bill would prohibit an assessment reduction filing service from charging, demanding, or collecting money in connection with a request for review, or in connection with an assessment appeal application, until after the request is filed with the assessor or until after the assessment appeal is filed with the clerk of the assessment appeals board, as specified. The bill would make it unlawful for an offeror of an assessment reduction filing service to file a request or application of any kind for reduction in assessment without first obtaining a written authorization from the property owner and would impose other requirements with respect to that written authorization. Because a violation of these provisions would be a crime, and because this bill would expand the scope of services subject to the provisions regulating assessment appeal application filing services, a violation of which is a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/02/09 - Enrolled pdf September 02, 2009
- Amended 06/30/09 - Amended Senate pdf June 30, 2009
- Amended 04/21/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 21, 2009
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
- AB992 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 496, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 2 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 64. Noes 6. Page 2802.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 4. Page 1970.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 23).
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 66. Noes 10. Page 1674.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 13).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 28).
-
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Lieu · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Lieu
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 69 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 75 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 8% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Not Voting |
| Duvall | — | Not Voting |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Not Voting |
| Blakeslee | — | Not Voting |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 10% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Romero | — | Not Voting |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 68 | 11 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 76 | 11 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 12% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Bill | — | Not Voting |
| Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Not Voting |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Not Voting |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Not Voting |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 992 do?
- Existing law provides that certain advertising related practices are unlawful and makes a violation of those provisions a crime. Existing law makes it unlawful for a person to make any untrue or misleading statements in any manner in connection with the offering or performance of an assessment appeal application filing service, which is defined as any service performed or offered to be performed for compensation in connection with an application for reduction in assessment of residential property, as specified. Existing law exempts from the definition of an assessment appeal application filing service any service performed by a person who actively advocates, in person or by written and oral communications, on behalf of the person to whom a solicitation is made before the assessment appeals board or the assessor's office. This bill would recast these provisions to instead make them applicable to an assessment reduction filing service, which would be defined as any service performed or offered to be performed for compensation in connection with an application or request of any kind of reduction in assessment of residential property, as specified, or to provide comparable sales information in connection with such an application or request. The bill would delete the exemption in the definition of an assessment appeal application filing service and thereby include in the definition of an assessment reduction filing service those services performed by a person who actively advocates, in person or by written and oral communications, on behalf of the person to whom a solicitation is made before the assessment appeals board or the assessor's office. The bill would prohibit an assessment reduction filing service from charging, demanding, or collecting money in connection with a request for review, or in connection with an assessment appeal application, until after the request is filed with the assessor or until after the assessment appeal is filed with the clerk of the assessment appeals board, as specified. The bill would make it unlawful for an offeror of an assessment reduction filing service to file a request or application of any kind for reduction in assessment without first obtaining a written authorization from the property owner and would impose other requirements with respect to that written authorization. Because a violation of these provisions would be a crime, and because this bill would expand the scope of services subject to the provisions regulating assessment appeal application filing services, a violation of which is a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 992?
- AB 992 is sponsored by Lieu.
- What is the current status of AB 992?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2009. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 992?
- Track AB 992 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 992
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 992
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →