California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 992 — Advertising: residential property taxes: assessment appeal application filing services.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 496, Statutes of 2009.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2009. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law provides that certain advertising related practices are unlawful and makes a violation of those provisions a crime. Existing law makes it unlawful for a person to make any untrue or misleading statements in any manner in connection with the offering or performance of an assessment appeal application filing service, which is defined as any service performed or offered to be performed for compensation in connection with an application for reduction in assessment of residential property, as specified. Existing law exempts from the definition of an assessment appeal application filing service any service performed by a person who actively advocates, in person or by written and oral communications, on behalf of the person to whom a solicitation is made before the assessment appeals board or the assessor's office. This bill would recast these provisions to instead make them applicable to an assessment reduction filing service, which would be defined as any service performed or offered to be performed for compensation in connection with an application or request of any kind of reduction in assessment of residential property, as specified, or to provide comparable sales information in connection with such an application or request. The bill would delete the exemption in the definition of an assessment appeal application filing service and thereby include in the definition of an assessment reduction filing service those services performed by a person who actively advocates, in person or by written and oral communications, on behalf of the person to whom a solicitation is made before the assessment appeals board or the assessor's office. The bill would prohibit an assessment reduction filing service from charging, demanding, or collecting money in connection with a request for review, or in connection with an assessment appeal application, until after the request is filed with the assessor or until after the assessment appeal is filed with the clerk of the assessment appeals board, as specified. The bill would make it unlawful for an offeror of an assessment reduction filing service to file a request or application of any kind for reduction in assessment without first obtaining a written authorization from the property owner and would impose other requirements with respect to that written authorization. Because a violation of these provisions would be a crime, and because this bill would expand the scope of services subject to the provisions regulating assessment appeal application filing services, a violation of which is a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 496, Statutes of 2009.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and to the Governor at 2 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 64. Noes 6. Page 2802.)

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 4. Page 1970.)

  7. Read second time. To third reading.

  8. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  9. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 23).

  11. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  12. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  13. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 66. Noes 10. Page 1674.)

  14. Read second time. To third reading.

  15. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 13).

  16. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 28).

  17. Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.

  18. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. Read second time and amended.

  19. Referred to Com. on B. & P.

  20. Read first time.

  21. From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.

  22. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Lieu · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Lieu

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 75 Yea · 7 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 69709
Democratic 3000
Republican 3000
Total 75709
% of votes cast 82%8%0%10%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Not Voting
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Cook — Yea
Bill — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Tom — Nay
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Portantino — Not Voting
Conway — Not Voting
Duvall — Not Voting
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Bass — Not Voting
Blakeslee — Not Voting
Hagman — Nay
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Not Voting
Knight — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Yea
Adams — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Ma — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Villines — Not Voting
Emmerson — Yea
Coto — Yea
Evans — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Not Voting
Fuller — Nay
Garrick — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 34 Yea · 4 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 32402
Democratic 1001
Republican 1000
Total 34403
% of votes cast 83%10%0%7%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Romero — Not Voting
Cogdill — Yea
Florez — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Harman — Yea
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Benoit — Yea
Hollingsworth — Nay
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Price — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Not Voting
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 76 Yea · 11 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 681105
Democratic 5000
Republican 3000
Total 761105
% of votes cast 83%12%0%5%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Charles — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Gaines — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Davis — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Price — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Tom — Nay
Berryhill — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Bill — Not Voting
Berryhill — Not Voting
Conway — Nay
Hagman — Not Voting
Jeffries — Not Voting
Knight — Nay
Logue — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Bass — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Duvall — Not Voting
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Villines — Nay
Adams — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Huber — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Tran — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Eng — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Garrick — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 21 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 19000
Democratic 1000
Republican 1000
Total 21000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Charles — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Price — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10002
Republican 1000
Total 11002
% of votes cast 85%0%0%15%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Hayashi — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Conway — Not Voting
Nava — Yea
Price — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Emmerson — Not Voting
Eng — Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 992 do?
Existing law provides that certain advertising related practices are unlawful and makes a violation of those provisions a crime. Existing law makes it unlawful for a person to make any untrue or misleading statements in any manner in connection with the offering or performance of an assessment appeal application filing service, which is defined as any service performed or offered to be performed for compensation in connection with an application for reduction in assessment of residential property, as specified. Existing law exempts from the definition of an assessment appeal application filing service any service performed by a person who actively advocates, in person or by written and oral communications, on behalf of the person to whom a solicitation is made before the assessment appeals board or the assessor's office. This bill would recast these provisions to instead make them applicable to an assessment reduction filing service, which would be defined as any service performed or offered to be performed for compensation in connection with an application or request of any kind of reduction in assessment of residential property, as specified, or to provide comparable sales information in connection with such an application or request. The bill would delete the exemption in the definition of an assessment appeal application filing service and thereby include in the definition of an assessment reduction filing service those services performed by a person who actively advocates, in person or by written and oral communications, on behalf of the person to whom a solicitation is made before the assessment appeals board or the assessor's office. The bill would prohibit an assessment reduction filing service from charging, demanding, or collecting money in connection with a request for review, or in connection with an assessment appeal application, until after the request is filed with the assessor or until after the assessment appeal is filed with the clerk of the assessment appeals board, as specified. The bill would make it unlawful for an offeror of an assessment reduction filing service to file a request or application of any kind for reduction in assessment without first obtaining a written authorization from the property owner and would impose other requirements with respect to that written authorization. Because a violation of these provisions would be a crime, and because this bill would expand the scope of services subject to the provisions regulating assessment appeal application filing services, a violation of which is a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 992?
AB 992 is sponsored by Lieu.
What is the current status of AB 992?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2009. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 992?
Track AB 992 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 992

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 992

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →