California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 1193 — School facilities funding: high performance schools.

Last action — From Assembly without further action.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law, the Leroy F. Greene School Facilities Act of 1998 (the Greene Act) , requires the State Allocation Board to allocate to applicant school districts prescribed per-unhoused-pupil state funding for construction and modernization of school facilities, including hardship funding and supplemental funding for site development and acquisition and requires the board to adopt rules and regulations for the administration of the Greene Act. The Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2006 (2006 bond act) sets aside $100,000,000 of the proceeds of the bonds sold under that act for incentive grants under the Greene Act to promote the use of design and materials in new construction and modernization projects that include the attributes of high performance schools. Existing law authorizes a grant for new construction to be used for the costs of design and materials that promote the efficient use of energy and water, the maximum use of natural lighting and indoor air quality, the use of recycled materials and materials that emit a minimum of toxic substances, the use of acoustics conducive to teaching and learning, and other characteristics of high performance schools. A school district is required to certify, as part of its application for funding under the Greene Act, that it has considered the feasibility of using these characteristics of high performance schools. This bill would increase the amount of a modernization grant by $250,000 per schoolsite and the amount of a new construction grant by $150,000 per schoolsite if a school district incorporates the use of high performance design and materials, and if the project is able to achieve one of 2 specified objectives. This increase would be provided from the $100,000,000 set aside for this purpose in the 2006 bond act. The bill would require the State Allocation Board to adopt, and the Office of Administrative Law to process, emergency regulations to implement these provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Assembly without further action.

  2. Placed on inactive file on request of Assembly Member Charles Calderon.

  3. Read second time. To third reading.

  4. Read second time. Amended. To second reading.

  5. (Heard in committee August 12.)

  6. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)

  7. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  8. Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 5989.)

  9. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. (Heard in committee on June 30.)

  11. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.)

  12. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  13. To Com. on ED.

  14. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  15. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 27. Noes 4. Page 3782.) To Assembly.

  16. Read second time. Amended. To third reading.

  17. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 3673.)

  18. (Suspense - for vote only.)

  19. Set for hearing May 27.

  20. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  21. Placed on APPR suspense file.

  22. Set for hearing May 3.

  23. Hearing postponed by committee.

  24. Set for hearing April 26.

  25. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  26. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3183.)

  27. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  28. Set for hearing April 14.

  29. To Com. on ED.

  30. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 21.

  31. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (2)

  • Pavley
  • Torlakson

Not signed on (119)

119 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 119 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Do pass as amended.

Passed 13 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13500
Total 13500
% of votes cast 72%28%0%0%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Gatto — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Conway — Nay
Huffman — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Miller — Nay
Norby — Nay
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea

Official roll call →

Senate 3rd Reading SB1193 Lowenthal Urgency Clause

Passed 28 Yea · 4 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 26307
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 28407
% of votes cast 72%10%0%18%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Hollingsworth — Not Voting
Runner — Not Voting
Ducheny — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Dutton — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Romero — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Not Voting
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Correa — Yea
Cox — Not Voting
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 7 Yea · 3 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7301
Total 7301
% of votes cast 64%27%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Walters — Nay
Price — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Cox — Not Voting
Denham — Nay

Official roll call →

Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10001
Total 10001
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Leno — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Alquist — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Price — Yea
Cox — Yea
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

environment education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1193 do?
Existing law, the Leroy F. Greene School Facilities Act of 1998 (the Greene Act) , requires the State Allocation Board to allocate to applicant school districts prescribed per-unhoused-pupil state funding for construction and modernization of school facilities, including hardship funding and supplemental funding for site development and acquisition and requires the board to adopt rules and regulations for the administration of the Greene Act. The Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2006 (2006 bond act) sets aside $100,000,000 of the proceeds of the bonds sold under that act for incentive grants under the Greene Act to promote the use of design and materials in new construction and modernization projects that include the attributes of high performance schools. Existing law authorizes a grant for new construction to be used for the costs of design and materials that promote the efficient use of energy and water, the maximum use of natural lighting and indoor air quality, the use of recycled materials and materials that emit a minimum of toxic substances, the use of acoustics conducive to teaching and learning, and other characteristics of high performance schools. A school district is required to certify, as part of its application for funding under the Greene Act, that it has considered the feasibility of using these characteristics of high performance schools. This bill would increase the amount of a modernization grant by $250,000 per schoolsite and the amount of a new construction grant by $150,000 per schoolsite if a school district incorporates the use of high performance design and materials, and if the project is able to achieve one of 2 specified objectives. This increase would be provided from the $100,000,000 set aside for this purpose in the 2006 bond act. The bill would require the State Allocation Board to adopt, and the Office of Administrative Law to process, emergency regulations to implement these provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors SB 1193?
SB 1193 is sponsored by Pavley, Torlakson, and Bonnie Lowenthal.
What is the current status of SB 1193?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1193?
Track SB 1193 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1193

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 1193

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →