South Coast Air Quality Management District: CEQA: permits.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 827 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 827.
You're tracking SB 827
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 827 — South Coast Air Quality Management District: CEQA: permits.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 206, Statutes of 2009.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA exempts certain specified projects from its requirements. Under existing law, every air pollution control district or air quality management district in a federal nonattainment area for any national ambient air quality standard is required to establish by regulation, a system by which all reductions in emissions of air contaminants that are to be used to offset certain future increases in the emission of air contaminants are banked prior to use. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (district) promulgated various rules establishing offset exemptions, providing Priority Reserve offset credits, and creating or tracking credits used for offset exemption or Priority Reserve projects. In Natural Resources Defense Council v. South Coast Air Quality Management District (Super. Ct. Los Angeles County, 2007, No. BS 110792) , the superior court found the promulgation of certain of these district rules to be in violation of CEQA. This bill would authorize the district to issue permits under specified circumstances, notwithstanding this court decision. The provisions of the bill would be repealed on May 1, 2012. (2) This bill would state the findings and declarations of the Legislature concerning the need for special legislation.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/15/09 - Enrolled pdf September 15, 2009
- Amended 09/12/09 - Amended Assembly pdf September 12, 2009
- Amended 09/04/09 - Amended Assembly pdf September 04, 2009
- Introduced 03/19/09 - Introduced pdf March 19, 2009
- SB827 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 206, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 1 p.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 27. Noes 9. Page 2457.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 45. Noes 21. Page 3399.) To Senate.
-
Amended.
-
Read second time.
-
(Heard in committee on September 11.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 2.)
-
Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 3319.)
-
(Heard in committee on September 9.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on U. & C. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
-
Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 3056.)
-
Re-referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and U. & C. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
-
Read third time. Amended. (Page 3044.)
-
From inactive file to third reading file.
-
Notice of motion to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Torrico.
-
Placed on inactive file on request of Assembly Member Torrico.
-
From Consent Calendar to third reading.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
-
To Com. on G.O.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 928.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 849.)
-
Set for hearing May 12.
-
To Com. on G.O.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after April 19.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Wright · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Wright
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 48 | 22 | 0 | 15 |
| Democratic | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 51 | 24 | 0 | 16 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 26% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Not Voting |
| Bonnie | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Nay |
| John | — | Nay |
| A. | — | Nay |
| Perez | — | Nay |
| Portantino | — | Nay |
| Salas | — | Nay |
| Feuer | — | Nay |
| De | — | Not Voting |
| La | — | Not Voting |
| Torre | — | Not Voting |
| De | — | Not Voting |
| Leon | — | Not Voting |
| Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Saldana | — | Not Voting |
| Chesbro | — | Nay |
| Huffman | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Not Voting |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Nay |
| Nava | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Nay |
| Torrico | — | Not Voting |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Nay |
| Buchanan | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Nay |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Not Voting |
| Ma | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Not Voting |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Nay |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 9 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 9 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 66% | 22% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Nay |
| Negrete | — | Not Voting |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Nay |
| McLeod | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Not Voting |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Not Voting |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Nay |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 10 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 13% | 0% | 25% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Not Voting |
| Buchanan | — | Not Voting |
| Huffman | — | Nay |
| Torrico | — | Not Voting |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 20 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Not Voting |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 827 do?
- (1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA exempts certain specified projects from its requirements. Under existing law, every air pollution control district or air quality management district in a federal nonattainment area for any national ambient air quality standard is required to establish by regulation, a system by which all reductions in emissions of air contaminants that are to be used to offset certain future increases in the emission of air contaminants are banked prior to use. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (district) promulgated various rules establishing offset exemptions, providing Priority Reserve offset credits, and creating or tracking credits used for offset exemption or Priority Reserve projects. In Natural Resources Defense Council v. South Coast Air Quality Management District (Super. Ct. Los Angeles County, 2007, No. BS 110792) , the superior court found the promulgation of certain of these district rules to be in violation of CEQA. This bill would authorize the district to issue permits under specified circumstances, notwithstanding this court decision. The provisions of the bill would be repealed on May 1, 2012. (2) This bill would state the findings and declarations of the Legislature concerning the need for special legislation.
- Who sponsors SB 827?
- SB 827 is sponsored by Wright.
- What is the current status of SB 827?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 827?
- Track SB 827 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 827
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 827
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →