California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 R cosponsors

SB 190 — Property taxes: TEA formula allocation: maintenance or improvement districts.

Last action — From Assembly without further action.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing property tax law requires the auditor of each county with qualifying cities, as defined, to make certain property tax revenue allocations to those cities in accordance with an established Tax Equity Allocation (TEA) formula and to make corresponding reductions in the amount of property tax revenue that is allocated to the county, as specified. This bill, commencing with the 2011–12 fiscal year, would prohibit the auditor of those counties from reducing the amount distributed to a qualifying city by reason of that city receiving property taxes previously allocated to a maintenance or improvement district pursuant to specified provisions. By imposing new duties upon county officials in the allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Assembly without further action.

  2. From committee without further action.

  3. Re-referred to Com. on RULES.

  4. Action rescinded whereby the bill was re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.

  5. Re-referred to Com. On L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.

  6. Read third time. Amended. (Page 6370.)

  7. From inactive file to third reading file.

  8. Notice of motion to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Evans.

  9. Placed on inactive file on request of Assembly Member Torrico.

  10. Read second time. To third reading.

  11. (Heard in committee on August 19.)

  12. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)

  13. (Heard in committee on July 7.)

  14. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  15. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  16. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  17. To Com. on HEALTH.

  18. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  19. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 1. Page 1093.) To Assembly.

  20. Read second time. To third reading.

  21. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 1. Page 1025.)

  22. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  23. Set for hearing May 26.

  24. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  25. Set for hearing May 18.

  26. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  27. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 729.)

  28. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  29. Set for hearing April 29.

  30. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  31. Hearing postponed by committee.

  32. Set for hearing April 15.

  33. To Com. on HEALTH.

  34. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 22.

  35. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (3)

Not signed on (118)

118 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 118 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Do pass.

Passed 16 Yea · 6 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15500
Democratic 1000
Republican 0100
Total 16600
% of votes cast 73%27%0%0%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
Fuentes — Yea
Hall — Yea
Charles — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Miller — Nay
Audra — Nay
Conway — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Coto — Yea
Duvall — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Passed 16 Yea · 5 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15405
Republican 1100
Total 16505
% of votes cast 62%19%0%19%
How each member voted (26)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Not Voting
Carter — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Salas — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Audra — Nay
V. — Not Voting
Manuel — Not Voting
Perez — Not Voting
Hayashi — Yea
Conway — Nay
Adams — Not Voting
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Nava — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Senate 3rd Reading SB190 Wright

Passed 37 Yea · 1 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 34102
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 37102
% of votes cast 93%3%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Dutton — Not Voting
McLeod — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Hollingsworth — Not Voting
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 8 Yea · 1 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8104
Total 8104
% of votes cast 62%8%0%31%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Hancock — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Leno — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Corbett — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

taxation housing
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 190 do?
Existing property tax law requires the auditor of each county with qualifying cities, as defined, to make certain property tax revenue allocations to those cities in accordance with an established Tax Equity Allocation (TEA) formula and to make corresponding reductions in the amount of property tax revenue that is allocated to the county, as specified. This bill, commencing with the 2011–12 fiscal year, would prohibit the auditor of those counties from reducing the amount distributed to a qualifying city by reason of that city receiving property taxes previously allocated to a maintenance or improvement district pursuant to specified provisions. By imposing new duties upon county officials in the allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors SB 190?
SB 190 is sponsored by Smyth, Wright, Strickland, Tony (Republican), and Bonnie Lowenthal.
What is the current status of SB 190?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 190?
Track SB 190 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 190

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 190

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →