AB 977 — Pharmacists: immunization protocols.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the Pharmacy Law, provides for the licensing and regulation of pharmacists by the California State Board of Pharmacy. A violation of the Pharmacy Law is a crime. Existing law, among other things, authorizes a pharmacist to administer immunizations pursuant to a protocol with a prescriber. This bill, until January 1, 2015, would additionally authorize a pharmacistassociated with an independent community pharmacy, as defined, to initiate and administer influenza immunizations to any person 18 years of age or older pursuant to standardized protocols developed and approved by the Medical Board of California in consultation with public health officers. The bill would, with respect to the development and approval of those standardized protocols, authorize the Medical Board of California to consult with the board. The bill would require a pharmacist, prior to initiating and administering those immunizations, to complete a specified pharmacy-based immunization delivery training program. The bill would also require a pharmacist initiating and administering those immunizations to complete 3 hours of immunization-related continuing education coursework annually and to be certified in basic life support. The bill would require a pharmacist, at the time of administration of that immunization, to provide the patient with a Vaccine Information Statement and to provide the patient and the patient's physician with documentation of administration of the immunization. The bill would also require a pharmacist administering that immunization to maintain a specified immunization record, provide documentation of administration to the appropriate immunization registry, report any adverse event and ensure proper storage and handling of vaccines. The bill would authorize a pharmacist initiating and administering vaccines under these provisions to initiate and administer epinephrine for severe allergic reactions. This bill would require the board and the Medical Board of California to complete an evaluation of influenza immunizations initiated and administered under the standardized protocols authorized by the bill, and would require the board to report to the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature by January 1, 2014. Because this bill would create new requirements under the Pharmacy Law, the violation of which would be a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/01/10 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 01, 2010
- Amended 01/25/10 - Amended Assembly pdf January 25, 2010
- Amended 01/13/10 - Amended Assembly pdf January 13, 2010
- Amended 01/06/10 - Amended Assembly pdf January 06, 2010
- Amended 01/04/10 - Amended Assembly pdf January 04, 2010
- Amended 04/23/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 23, 2009
- Amended 04/13/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 13, 2009
- Introduced 02/26/09 - Introduced pdf February 26, 2009
- AB977 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
Referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and HEALTH.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 47. Noes 14. Page 3909.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (January 21).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (January 12).
-
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
-
(Corrected January 11.)
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. Re-referred. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (January 5).
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 5).
-
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
-
(Corrected May 14.)
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
-
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
-
(Corrected April 22.)
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on B. & P. and HEALTH.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Skinner · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Skinner
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 49 | 15 | 0 | 20 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 55 | 15 | 0 | 20 |
| % of votes cast | 61% | 17% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (90)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Not Voting |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Fuentes | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| De | — | Not Voting |
| Leon | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| V. | — | Not Voting |
| Manuel | — | Not Voting |
| Perez | — | Not Voting |
| Portantino | — | Not Voting |
| Salas | — | Not Voting |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Not Voting |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Not Voting |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Not Voting |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Not Voting |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| DeVore | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Not Voting |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (26)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Not Voting |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eng | — | Not Voting |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 46% | 23% | 0% | 31% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Not Voting |
| Ruskin | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Conway | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 977 do?
- Existing law, the Pharmacy Law, provides for the licensing and regulation of pharmacists by the California State Board of Pharmacy. A violation of the Pharmacy Law is a crime. Existing law, among other things, authorizes a pharmacist to administer immunizations pursuant to a protocol with a prescriber. This bill, until January 1, 2015, would additionally authorize a pharmacistassociated with an independent community pharmacy, as defined, to initiate and administer influenza immunizations to any person 18 years of age or older pursuant to standardized protocols developed and approved by the Medical Board of California in consultation with public health officers. The bill would, with respect to the development and approval of those standardized protocols, authorize the Medical Board of California to consult with the board. The bill would require a pharmacist, prior to initiating and administering those immunizations, to complete a specified pharmacy-based immunization delivery training program. The bill would also require a pharmacist initiating and administering those immunizations to complete 3 hours of immunization-related continuing education coursework annually and to be certified in basic life support. The bill would require a pharmacist, at the time of administration of that immunization, to provide the patient with a Vaccine Information Statement and to provide the patient and the patient's physician with documentation of administration of the immunization. The bill would also require a pharmacist administering that immunization to maintain a specified immunization record, provide documentation of administration to the appropriate immunization registry, report any adverse event and ensure proper storage and handling of vaccines. The bill would authorize a pharmacist initiating and administering vaccines under these provisions to initiate and administer epinephrine for severe allergic reactions. This bill would require the board and the Medical Board of California to complete an evaluation of influenza immunizations initiated and administered under the standardized protocols authorized by the bill, and would require the board to report to the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature by January 1, 2014. Because this bill would create new requirements under the Pharmacy Law, the violation of which would be a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 977?
- AB 977 is sponsored by Skinner.
- What is the current status of AB 977?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 977?
- Track AB 977 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 977
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 977
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →