California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 73 — State fees.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 341, Statutes of 2009.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Under existing law, the Department of Housing and Community Development is required to establish a schedule of fees to pay for the cost of administration and enforcement of the Employee Housing Act. The department is required to establish a schedule of fees that includes, but is not limited to, specified minimum permit fees. The department is authorized, on or after January 1, 2010, to increase these specified fees, if necessary, to finance the costs of administration and enforcement of the act. Existing law also requires the department to gather certain information for permittees for which it acts as the enforcement agency, except as specified. The Mobilehome Parks Act requires the payment of various registration and renewal fees to the department for a specified section of a manufactured home, mobilehome, or commercial coach and the payment of an annual operating permit fee, as specified. Existing law, among other things, establishes the Labor Enforcement and Compliance Fund in the State Treasury and requires the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations to levy a separate surcharge upon all employers for purposes of deposit in the fund. Existing law requires that the total amount of the surcharges be allocated between employers in proportion to payroll respectively paid in the most recent year for which payroll information is available, and requires the director to adopt reasonable regulations governing the manner of collection of the surcharges. This bill would repeal and reinstate these provisions of existing law.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 341, Statutes of 2009.

  2. Approved by Governor.

  3. Enrolled. To Governor at 11 a.m.

  4. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 22. Noes 15. Page 2367.) To enrollment.

  5. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 51. Noes 22. Page 3073.) To Senate.

  7. Read third time. Amended. (Page 3040.) To third reading.

  8. From inactive file to third reading file.

  9. Notice of motion to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Krekorian.

  10. Placed on inactive file on request of Assembly Member Krekorian.

  11. Read second time. To third reading.

  12. Placed on second reading file.

  13. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  14. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 14. Page 512.) To Assembly.

  15. Read second time. To third reading.

  16. Placed on second reading file.

  17. Withdrawn from committee.

  18. To Com. on RLS.

  19. Read first time.

  20. From print. May be acted upon on or after February 20.

  21. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 22 Yea · 15 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 201404
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 221504
% of votes cast 54%37%0%10%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Negrete — Not Voting
Florez — Not Voting
McLeod — Not Voting
Oropeza — Not Voting
Walters — Nay
Cogdill — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Runner — Nay
Ashburn — Nay
Benoit — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Price — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Harman — Nay
Maldonado — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wright — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Correa — Nay
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 58 Yea · 27 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 542506
Democratic 3000
Republican 1200
Total 582706
% of votes cast 64%30%0%7%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Nay
La — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Cook — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Coto — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Duvall — Nay
Bill — Nay
Tom — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
V. — Nay
Manuel — Nay
Perez — Nay
Audra — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Furutani — Yea
Fletcher — Not Voting
Garrick — Not Voting
Bass — Yea
Brownley — Not Voting
Gilmore — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Krekorian — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Not Voting
Villines — Nay
Adams — Not Voting
Ammiano — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huber — Not Voting
Knight — Nay
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Conway — Nay
Eng — Yea
Davis — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 23 Yea · 14 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211302
Democratic 2001
Republican 0100
Total 231403
% of votes cast 58%35%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Negrete — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Hancock — Yea
Runner — Nay
Harman — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Nay
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Benoit — Nay
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 73 do?
Under existing law, the Department of Housing and Community Development is required to establish a schedule of fees to pay for the cost of administration and enforcement of the Employee Housing Act. The department is required to establish a schedule of fees that includes, but is not limited to, specified minimum permit fees. The department is authorized, on or after January 1, 2010, to increase these specified fees, if necessary, to finance the costs of administration and enforcement of the act. Existing law also requires the department to gather certain information for permittees for which it acts as the enforcement agency, except as specified. The Mobilehome Parks Act requires the payment of various registration and renewal fees to the department for a specified section of a manufactured home, mobilehome, or commercial coach and the payment of an annual operating permit fee, as specified. Existing law, among other things, establishes the Labor Enforcement and Compliance Fund in the State Treasury and requires the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations to levy a separate surcharge upon all employers for purposes of deposit in the fund. Existing law requires that the total amount of the surcharges be allocated between employers in proportion to payroll respectively paid in the most recent year for which payroll information is available, and requires the director to adopt reasonable regulations governing the manner of collection of the surcharges. This bill would repeal and reinstate these provisions of existing law.
Who sponsors SB 73?
SB 73 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
What is the current status of SB 73?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 73?
Track SB 73 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 73

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 73

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →