State fees.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 73 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 73.
You're tracking SB 73
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 73 — State fees.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 341, Statutes of 2009.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Under existing law, the Department of Housing and Community Development is required to establish a schedule of fees to pay for the cost of administration and enforcement of the Employee Housing Act. The department is required to establish a schedule of fees that includes, but is not limited to, specified minimum permit fees. The department is authorized, on or after January 1, 2010, to increase these specified fees, if necessary, to finance the costs of administration and enforcement of the act. Existing law also requires the department to gather certain information for permittees for which it acts as the enforcement agency, except as specified. The Mobilehome Parks Act requires the payment of various registration and renewal fees to the department for a specified section of a manufactured home, mobilehome, or commercial coach and the payment of an annual operating permit fee, as specified. Existing law, among other things, establishes the Labor Enforcement and Compliance Fund in the State Treasury and requires the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations to levy a separate surcharge upon all employers for purposes of deposit in the fund. Existing law requires that the total amount of the surcharges be allocated between employers in proportion to payroll respectively paid in the most recent year for which payroll information is available, and requires the director to adopt reasonable regulations governing the manner of collection of the surcharges. This bill would repeal and reinstate these provisions of existing law.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/11/09 - Enrolled pdf September 11, 2009
- Amended 09/04/09 - Amended Assembly pdf September 04, 2009
- Introduced 01/20/09 - Introduced pdf January 20, 2009
- SB73 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 341, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 11 a.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 22. Noes 15. Page 2367.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 51. Noes 22. Page 3073.) To Senate.
-
Read third time. Amended. (Page 3040.) To third reading.
-
From inactive file to third reading file.
-
Notice of motion to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Krekorian.
-
Placed on inactive file on request of Assembly Member Krekorian.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Placed on second reading file.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 14. Page 512.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Placed on second reading file.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
To Com. on RLS.
-
Read first time.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after February 20.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 14 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 15 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 37% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Negrete | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Not Voting |
| McLeod | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Benoit | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 54 | 25 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 58 | 27 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 30% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| La | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Nay |
| Manuel | — | Nay |
| Perez | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Garrick | — | Not Voting |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Not Voting |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Not Voting |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 13 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 23 | 14 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 35% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 73 do?
- Under existing law, the Department of Housing and Community Development is required to establish a schedule of fees to pay for the cost of administration and enforcement of the Employee Housing Act. The department is required to establish a schedule of fees that includes, but is not limited to, specified minimum permit fees. The department is authorized, on or after January 1, 2010, to increase these specified fees, if necessary, to finance the costs of administration and enforcement of the act. Existing law also requires the department to gather certain information for permittees for which it acts as the enforcement agency, except as specified. The Mobilehome Parks Act requires the payment of various registration and renewal fees to the department for a specified section of a manufactured home, mobilehome, or commercial coach and the payment of an annual operating permit fee, as specified. Existing law, among other things, establishes the Labor Enforcement and Compliance Fund in the State Treasury and requires the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations to levy a separate surcharge upon all employers for purposes of deposit in the fund. Existing law requires that the total amount of the surcharges be allocated between employers in proportion to payroll respectively paid in the most recent year for which payroll information is available, and requires the director to adopt reasonable regulations governing the manner of collection of the surcharges. This bill would repeal and reinstate these provisions of existing law.
- Who sponsors SB 73?
- SB 73 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
- What is the current status of SB 73?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 73?
- Track SB 73 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 73
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 73
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →