California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 597 — Child welfare services, foster care services, and adoption assistance.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 339, Statutes of 2009.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law requires the State Department of Mental Health to establish, by regulations, no later than December 31, 1994, program standards for any facility licensed as a community treatment facility. Under existing law, until January 1, 2010, the department shall not require a community treatment facility that meets certain requirements to have 24-hour onsite licensed nursing staff. This bill would extend applicability of the above provisions relating to onsite licensed nursing staff to January 1, 2013. (2) Existing law, the California Community Care Facilities Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of foster family agencies, as defined, by the State Department of Social Services, including applicable personnel requirements. Violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. This bill would require a foster family agency that provides treatment of children in foster families to employ one full-time social work supervisor for every eight social workers, or fraction thereof, in the agency. The bill would require the implementation of this provision to cease on and after January 1, 2011, without the enactment of subsequent statutory authorization. By changing the definition of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law requires the juvenile court to conduct a hearing for the initial disposition of a dependent child of the court, and subsequent hearings to review the status of the child, as specified. Existing law specifies the circumstances under which the court may schedule a hearing to terminate parental rights or take other specified actions with respect to placement of a child who was under 3 years of age on the date of initial removal or is a member of a sibling group, as specified. This bill would require the court, in determining whether to schedule the hearing described above for a child under these circumstances, to take into account barriers to a parent's ability to remain in contact with his or her child due to the parent's incarceration or institutionalization. (4) Existing law establishes the Aid to Families with Dependent Children-Foster Care (AFDC-FC) program, under which counties provide payments to foster care providers on behalf of qualified children in foster care. The program is funded by a combination of federal, state, and county funds. Under existing law, AFDC-FC benefits are available, with specified exceptions, on behalf of qualified children under 18 years of age. Moneys from the General Fund are continuously appropriated to pay for the state's share of AFDC-FC costs. Under existing law, foster care providers licensed as group homes have rates established by classifying each group home program and applying a standardized schedule of rates. An adjusted schedule of rates is applicable to group home programs that receive AFDC-FC payments for services performed during the 2002–03 to 2009–10, inclusive, fiscal years. This bill would revise RCL point ranges for group home programs that receive AFDC-FC payments for services performed during the 2009–10 fiscal year, as specified. This bill would provide that no appropriation is made pursuant to the bill for the purpose of these provisions. Existing law reduces by 10% the standardized schedule of rates for foster family agencies, as defined, effective October 1, 2009. This bill would give the foster family flexibility in applying the rate reduction, but would prohibit more than 10% from being deducted from the child base and increment, as defined in departmental regulations. The bill, effective October 1, 2009, would apply similar rate reductions for foster family agency rates that are not determined by the schedule of rates set forth in the department's regulations. (5) Under existing law, the case plan is the foundation and central unifying tool in child welfare services. The components of the case plan include, when appropriate, a written description of the programs and services that will help a child, consistent with the child's best interests, prepare for the transition from foster care to independent living, for a child who is 16 years of age or older. Existing law requires, when a child is placed in foster care, that the child's case plan include a summary of the health and education information or records, including mental health information or records, of the child. This bill would require the State Department of Social Services, in consultation with pediatricians, health care experts, and experts in and recipients of child welfare services, to develop a plan for the ongoing oversight and coordination of health care services for a child in a foster care placement, consistent with specified federal law. (6) Existing law provides for the Adoption Assistance Program (AAP) , to be established and administered by the State Department of Social Services or the county, for the purpose of benefiting children residing in foster homes by providing the stability and security of permanent homes. The AAP provides for the payment by the department and counties, of cash assistance to eligible families that adopt eligible children, and bases the amount of the payment on the needs of the child and the resources of the family to meet those needs. Under existing law, at the time application for adoption of a child who is potentially eligible for AAP benefits is made, and at the time immediately prior to the finalization of the adoption decree, the department or the licensed adoption agency, whichever is appropriate, is required to provide the prospective adoptive family with designated information. This bill would additionally require the department or licensed adoption agency to provide information regarding the federal adoption tax credit for any individual who is adopting or considering adopting a child in foster care, in accordance with specified federal law. Existing law relating to adoption defines a special needs child as a child whose adoption without financial assistance would be unlikely because of specified characteristics or circumstances of the child. This bill would recast and revise the definition of a special needs child, and further would require the need for adoption subsidy to be evidenced by an unsuccessful search for an adoptive home to take the child without financial assistance, except under specified circumstances. The bill would make related changes to existing adoption assistance provisions. (7) Under existing law, the state, through the State Department of Social Services and county welfare departments, is required to establish and support a public system of statewide child welfare services. Existing law requires the case plan for a child 16 years of age or older to include a written description of the programs and services that will help the child prepare for the transition from foster care to independent living, as specified. This bill would require additional information pertaining to the child's transition to independent living to be provided in the 90-day period before the child attains 18 years of age, relating to, among other topics, housing, education, and employment services. By imposing additional duties upon each county, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. (8) (A) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 16119 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, proposed by AB 154, to be operative only if AB 154 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2010, and this bill is chaptered last. (B) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 16501.1 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, proposed by SB 118, to be operative only if SB 118 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2010, and this bill is chaptered last. (9) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 339, Statutes of 2009.

  2. Approved by Governor.

  3. Enrolled. To Governor at 11 a.m.

  4. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 33. Noes 1. Page 2373.) To enrollment.

  5. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3066.) To Senate.

  7. Read third time. Amended. To third reading.

  8. Read second time. To third reading.

  9. Read second time. Amended. To second reading.

  10. (Heard in committee on August 27.)

  11. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)

  12. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  13. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. (Heard in committee on June 30.)

  15. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  16. To Com. on HUM. S.

  17. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  18. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 1. Page 1100.) To Assembly.

  19. Read second time. To third reading.

  20. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 1073.)

  21. (Suspense - for vote only.)

  22. Set for hearing May 28.

  23. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  24. Placed on APPR suspense file.

  25. Set for hearing April 27.

  26. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  27. Withdrawn from committee.

  28. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 3. Noes 0. Page 497.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  29. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  30. Set for hearing April 14.

  31. To Coms. on HUMAN S. and JUD.

  32. Read first time.

  33. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.

  34. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Adams · Cosponsor
  • Liu · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Liu

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Adams

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 34 Yea · 1 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33104
Republican 1000
Democratic 0002
Total 34106
% of votes cast 83%2%0%15%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Florez — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Hollingsworth — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Dutton — Not Voting
Liu — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Benoit — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Price — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Not Voting
Denham — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Not Voting
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 90 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 84001
Democratic 3000
Republican 3000
Total 90001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Bill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Eng — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Charles — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Audra — Yea
Furutani — Not Voting
Bass — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Yea
Villines — Yea
Adams — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Ma — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Feuer — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 22 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 20000
Democratic 1000
Republican 1000
Total 22000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
Charles — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Conway — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 37 Yea · 1 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 34102
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 37102
% of votes cast 93%3%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Runner — Yea
Huff — Not Voting
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Harman — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Hollingsworth — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wiggins — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 8 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8005
Total 8005
% of votes cast 62%0%0%38%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Runner — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wolk — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Runner — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Leno — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Walters — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 597 do?
(1) Existing law requires the State Department of Mental Health to establish, by regulations, no later than December 31, 1994, program standards for any facility licensed as a community treatment facility. Under existing law, until January 1, 2010, the department shall not require a community treatment facility that meets certain requirements to have 24-hour onsite licensed nursing staff. This bill would extend applicability of the above provisions relating to onsite licensed nursing staff to January 1, 2013. (2) Existing law, the California Community Care Facilities Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of foster family agencies, as defined, by the State Department of Social Services, including applicable personnel requirements. Violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. This bill would require a foster family agency that provides treatment of children in foster families to employ one full-time social work supervisor for every eight social workers, or fraction thereof, in the agency. The bill would require the implementation of this provision to cease on and after January 1, 2011, without the enactment of subsequent statutory authorization. By changing the definition of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law requires the juvenile court to conduct a hearing for the initial disposition of a dependent child of the court, and subsequent hearings to review the status of the child, as specified. Existing law specifies the circumstances under which the court may schedule a hearing to terminate parental rights or take other specified actions with respect to placement of a child who was under 3 years of age on the date of initial removal or is a member of a sibling group, as specified. This bill would require the court, in determining whether to schedule the hearing described above for a child under these circumstances, to take into account barriers to a parent's ability to remain in contact with his or her child due to the parent's incarceration or institutionalization. (4) Existing law establishes the Aid to Families with Dependent Children-Foster Care (AFDC-FC) program, under which counties provide payments to foster care providers on behalf of qualified children in foster care. The program is funded by a combination of federal, state, and county funds. Under existing law, AFDC-FC benefits are available, with specified exceptions, on behalf of qualified children under 18 years of age. Moneys from the General Fund are continuously appropriated to pay for the state's share of AFDC-FC costs. Under existing law, foster care providers licensed as group homes have rates established by classifying each group home program and applying a standardized schedule of rates. An adjusted schedule of rates is applicable to group home programs that receive AFDC-FC payments for services performed during the 2002–03 to 2009–10, inclusive, fiscal years. This bill would revise RCL point ranges for group home programs that receive AFDC-FC payments for services performed during the 2009–10 fiscal year, as specified. This bill would provide that no appropriation is made pursuant to the bill for the purpose of these provisions. Existing law reduces by 10% the standardized schedule of rates for foster family agencies, as defined, effective October 1, 2009. This bill would give the foster family flexibility in applying the rate reduction, but would prohibit more than 10% from being deducted from the child base and increment, as defined in departmental regulations. The bill, effective October 1, 2009, would apply similar rate reductions for foster family agency rates that are not determined by the schedule of rates set forth in the department's regulations. (5) Under existing law, the case plan is the foundation and central unifying tool in child welfare services. The components of the case plan include, when appropriate, a written description of the programs and services that will help a child, consistent with the child's best interests, prepare for the transition from foster care to independent living, for a child who is 16 years of age or older. Existing law requires, when a child is placed in foster care, that the child's case plan include a summary of the health and education information or records, including mental health information or records, of the child. This bill would require the State Department of Social Services, in consultation with pediatricians, health care experts, and experts in and recipients of child welfare services, to develop a plan for the ongoing oversight and coordination of health care services for a child in a foster care placement, consistent with specified federal law. (6) Existing law provides for the Adoption Assistance Program (AAP) , to be established and administered by the State Department of Social Services or the county, for the purpose of benefiting children residing in foster homes by providing the stability and security of permanent homes. The AAP provides for the payment by the department and counties, of cash assistance to eligible families that adopt eligible children, and bases the amount of the payment on the needs of the child and the resources of the family to meet those needs. Under existing law, at the time application for adoption of a child who is potentially eligible for AAP benefits is made, and at the time immediately prior to the finalization of the adoption decree, the department or the licensed adoption agency, whichever is appropriate, is required to provide the prospective adoptive family with designated information. This bill would additionally require the department or licensed adoption agency to provide information regarding the federal adoption tax credit for any individual who is adopting or considering adopting a child in foster care, in accordance with specified federal law. Existing law relating to adoption defines a special needs child as a child whose adoption without financial assistance would be unlikely because of specified characteristics or circumstances of the child. This bill would recast and revise the definition of a special needs child, and further would require the need for adoption subsidy to be evidenced by an unsuccessful search for an adoptive home to take the child without financial assistance, except under specified circumstances. The bill would make related changes to existing adoption assistance provisions. (7) Under existing law, the state, through the State Department of Social Services and county welfare departments, is required to establish and support a public system of statewide child welfare services. Existing law requires the case plan for a child 16 years of age or older to include a written description of the programs and services that will help the child prepare for the transition from foster care to independent living, as specified. This bill would require additional information pertaining to the child's transition to independent living to be provided in the 90-day period before the child attains 18 years of age, relating to, among other topics, housing, education, and employment services. By imposing additional duties upon each county, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. (8) (A) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 16119 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, proposed by AB 154, to be operative only if AB 154 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2010, and this bill is chaptered last. (B) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 16501.1 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, proposed by SB 118, to be operative only if SB 118 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2010, and this bill is chaptered last. (9) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Who sponsors SB 597?
SB 597 is sponsored by Adams and Liu.
What is the current status of SB 597?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 597?
Track SB 597 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 597

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 597

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →