California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 1076 — Infill Incentive Grant Program of 2007.

Last action — From Senate committee without further action.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law establishes the Infill Incentive Grant Program of 2007 to be administered by the Department of Housing and Community Development and, upon appropriation by the Legislature, requires the department to establish and administer a competitive grant program to allocate funds to selected capital improvement projects that are an integral part of, or necessary to facilitate the development of, a qualifying infill project or qualifying infill area, as defined. Existing law requires the department to adopt guidelines for the operation of the grant program, and requires the guidelines to include provisions for the reversion of grant awards that are not encumbered within 4 years of the fiscal year in which an award was made. The Budget Act of 2009 appropriates $190,000,000 for local assistance to the department from the Regional Planning, Housing and Infill Incentive Account of 2006, and requires that the funds appropriated be available for liquidation of encumbrances until June 30, 2014. The Budget Act of 2007 appropriates $300,000,000 for local assistance to the department payable from the Regional Planning, Housing and Infill Incentive Account, and requires the funds appropriated to be available for liquidation of encumbrances until June 30, 2012. Existing law requires a redevelopment agency, for the 2009–10 fiscal year, to remit a specified amount of funds, as determined by the Director of Finance, to the county auditor for deposit in the Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund within the county treasury prior to May 10, 2010. This bill would require the department, with respect to grant awards affected by the requirement that a redevelopment agency remit a specified amount of funds, to include guidelines, among the adopted guidelines, for the reversion of grant awards that are not encumbered within a reasonable period of time, to be determined by the department. The bill would also revise the Budget Act of 2009 and the Budget Act of 2007 to require the department, with respect to grant awards affected by the requirement that a redevelopment agency remit a specified amount of funds, to develop guidelines for the reversion of grant awards that are not encumbered within a reasonable period of time, to be determined by the department.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Senate committee without further action.

  2. Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  3. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  4. Senate Rule 29.3 suspended.

  5. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  6. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  7. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  8. From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (July 15).

  9. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  10. Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  11. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  12. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 1966.)

  13. Read second time. To third reading.

  14. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  15. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 28).

  16. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  17. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (May 12).

  18. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  19. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.

  20. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  21. Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  22. Read first time.

  23. From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.

  24. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Jones · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Jones

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 1076 JONES Assembly Third Reading

Passed 89 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 83003
Democratic 3000
Republican 3000
Total 89003
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
Eng — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Tom — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Adams — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Cook — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Bill — Not Voting
Fuentes — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Bass — Yea
Block — Not Voting
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Price — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Silva — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Villines — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Coto — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Evans — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 22 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 20000
Democratic 1000
Republican 1000
Total 22000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Yea
Price — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Passed 25 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 23000
Republican 2000
Total 25000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (25)
Member Party Vote
Conway — Yea
Hall — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Gaines — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Audra — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Adams — Yea
Block — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Nava — Yea
Carter — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

housing
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1076 do?
Existing law establishes the Infill Incentive Grant Program of 2007 to be administered by the Department of Housing and Community Development and, upon appropriation by the Legislature, requires the department to establish and administer a competitive grant program to allocate funds to selected capital improvement projects that are an integral part of, or necessary to facilitate the development of, a qualifying infill project or qualifying infill area, as defined. Existing law requires the department to adopt guidelines for the operation of the grant program, and requires the guidelines to include provisions for the reversion of grant awards that are not encumbered within 4 years of the fiscal year in which an award was made. The Budget Act of 2009 appropriates $190,000,000 for local assistance to the department from the Regional Planning, Housing and Infill Incentive Account of 2006, and requires that the funds appropriated be available for liquidation of encumbrances until June 30, 2014. The Budget Act of 2007 appropriates $300,000,000 for local assistance to the department payable from the Regional Planning, Housing and Infill Incentive Account, and requires the funds appropriated to be available for liquidation of encumbrances until June 30, 2012. Existing law requires a redevelopment agency, for the 2009–10 fiscal year, to remit a specified amount of funds, as determined by the Director of Finance, to the county auditor for deposit in the Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund within the county treasury prior to May 10, 2010. This bill would require the department, with respect to grant awards affected by the requirement that a redevelopment agency remit a specified amount of funds, to include guidelines, among the adopted guidelines, for the reversion of grant awards that are not encumbered within a reasonable period of time, to be determined by the department. The bill would also revise the Budget Act of 2009 and the Budget Act of 2007 to require the department, with respect to grant awards affected by the requirement that a redevelopment agency remit a specified amount of funds, to develop guidelines for the reversion of grant awards that are not encumbered within a reasonable period of time, to be determined by the department.
Who sponsors AB 1076?
AB 1076 is sponsored by Jones.
What is the current status of AB 1076?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1076?
Track AB 1076 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1076

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1076

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →