SB 306 — Real property transactions.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 43, Statutes of 2009.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires that, upon a breach of the obligation of a mortgage or transfer of an interest in property, the trustee, mortgagee, or beneficiary record a notice of default in the office of the county recorder where the mortgaged or trust property is situated and mail the notice of default to the mortgagor or trustor. Existing law, until January 1, 2013, prohibits a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent from filing a notice of default for an additional 30 days on loans made between January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2007, that secure residential real property, under certain circumstances. This bill would, until January 1, 2013, provide that these provisions apply to mortgages and deeds of trust recorded between January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2007, secured by owner-occupied residential real property containing no more than 4 dwelling units. The bill would also, among other things, revise the declaration that is required to be filed in this connection with the notice of default. (2) Existing law states legislative findings and declarations with regard to the duty loan servicers have to maximize net present value under their pooling and servicing agreements, stating that their duty is owed to all parties in a loan pool, not to any particular parties, and that a servicer acts in the best interests of all parties if it agrees to or implements a loan modification or workout plan, as specified. This bill would specify the application of these findings and declarations to certain investors. (3) Existing law requires a trustee or authorized agent, upon posting a notice of sale, to post and mail a specified notice addressed to residents of property subject to foreclosure upon posting a notice of sale. Existing law requires a notice of sale to be recorded in the county in which the property, or some part of it, is situated at least 14 days prior to the date of sale. This bill would specify how and when this notice is to be mailed. This bill would extend the time during which the notice of sale must be recorded from 14 to 20 days. (4) Existing law requires a beneficiary on a deed of trust or a mortgagee on a mortgage to prepare and deliver a beneficiary statement or a pay-off demand statement within 21 days of receipt of a written demand from specified entitled parties. Existing law requires the written statement to include information reasonably necessary to calculate the payoff amount on a per diem basis for the period of time, not to exceed 30 days, during which the per diem amount is not changed by the terms of the note. The bill would, until January 1, 2014, require a beneficiary, within 21 days of the receipt of a short-pay request, as defined, to prepare and deliver a short-pay demand statement, which would be a written statement, conditioned on the existence of a short-pay agreement, that is prepared in response to a request from an entitled person or authorized agent, setting forth an amount less than the outstanding debt, together with any terms and conditions, under which the beneficiary would execute and deliver a reconveyance of the deed of trust securing the note that is the subject of the short-pay demand statement. The bill would provide that the short-pay agreement is an agreement in writing in which the beneficiary agrees to release its lien on a property in return for payment of an amount less than the secured obligation. The bill would permit a beneficiary that elects not to proceed with the transaction that is the subject of the short-pay request to refuse to provide a short-pay demand statement, but would require that he or she provide a written statement, indicating that the beneficiary has elected not to proceed. The bill would provide that if the terms and conditions of the short-pay agreement require approval by the beneficiary of a closing statement prepared by an escrowholder, approval or disapproval shall be provided not more than 4 days after receipt by the beneficiary of the closing statement, or the closing statement shall be deemed approved, except as specified. (5) The Escrow Law provides for licensing and regulation of escrow agents, other than certain exempt persons, by the Commissioner of Corporations. The law requires licensees to apply for membership in the Escrow Agents' Fidelity Corporation, a nonprofit mutual benefit corporation, which is established to indemnify its members against loss of trust obligations. The law limits required membership in the Escrow Agents' Fidelity Corporation who engage in certain kinds of business. Existing law defines and regulates the activities of exchange facilitators and excepts from the definition of exchange facilitator escrow companies, under specified circumstances. This bill would provide escrow transactions that involve money or property held or deposited pursuant to specified actions of an exchange facilitator regarding deposit of funds are not transactions that require a licensee to have membership in the Escrow Agents' Fidelity Corporation.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 08/06/09 - Chaptered Current pdf August 06, 2009
- Enrolled 07/17/09 - Enrolled pdf July 17, 2009
- Amended 06/22/09 - Amended Assembly pdf June 22, 2009
- Amended 04/21/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 21, 2009
- Introduced 02/25/09 - Introduced pdf February 25, 2009
- SB306 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 43, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 11:30 a.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 1766.) To enrollment.
-
To Special Consent Calendar.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2390.) To Senate.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.)
-
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
-
To Coms. on B. & F. and JUD.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 622.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. Amended. To Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 497.)
-
Set for hearing April 14.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 396.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Set for hearing April 1.
-
To Coms. on B., F. & I. and JUD.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 28.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Calderon · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Calderon
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 84 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Not Voting |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 306 do?
- (1) Existing law requires that, upon a breach of the obligation of a mortgage or transfer of an interest in property, the trustee, mortgagee, or beneficiary record a notice of default in the office of the county recorder where the mortgaged or trust property is situated and mail the notice of default to the mortgagor or trustor. Existing law, until January 1, 2013, prohibits a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent from filing a notice of default for an additional 30 days on loans made between January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2007, that secure residential real property, under certain circumstances. This bill would, until January 1, 2013, provide that these provisions apply to mortgages and deeds of trust recorded between January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2007, secured by owner-occupied residential real property containing no more than 4 dwelling units. The bill would also, among other things, revise the declaration that is required to be filed in this connection with the notice of default. (2) Existing law states legislative findings and declarations with regard to the duty loan servicers have to maximize net present value under their pooling and servicing agreements, stating that their duty is owed to all parties in a loan pool, not to any particular parties, and that a servicer acts in the best interests of all parties if it agrees to or implements a loan modification or workout plan, as specified. This bill would specify the application of these findings and declarations to certain investors. (3) Existing law requires a trustee or authorized agent, upon posting a notice of sale, to post and mail a specified notice addressed to residents of property subject to foreclosure upon posting a notice of sale. Existing law requires a notice of sale to be recorded in the county in which the property, or some part of it, is situated at least 14 days prior to the date of sale. This bill would specify how and when this notice is to be mailed. This bill would extend the time during which the notice of sale must be recorded from 14 to 20 days. (4) Existing law requires a beneficiary on a deed of trust or a mortgagee on a mortgage to prepare and deliver a beneficiary statement or a pay-off demand statement within 21 days of receipt of a written demand from specified entitled parties. Existing law requires the written statement to include information reasonably necessary to calculate the payoff amount on a per diem basis for the period of time, not to exceed 30 days, during which the per diem amount is not changed by the terms of the note. The bill would, until January 1, 2014, require a beneficiary, within 21 days of the receipt of a short-pay request, as defined, to prepare and deliver a short-pay demand statement, which would be a written statement, conditioned on the existence of a short-pay agreement, that is prepared in response to a request from an entitled person or authorized agent, setting forth an amount less than the outstanding debt, together with any terms and conditions, under which the beneficiary would execute and deliver a reconveyance of the deed of trust securing the note that is the subject of the short-pay demand statement. The bill would provide that the short-pay agreement is an agreement in writing in which the beneficiary agrees to release its lien on a property in return for payment of an amount less than the secured obligation. The bill would permit a beneficiary that elects not to proceed with the transaction that is the subject of the short-pay request to refuse to provide a short-pay demand statement, but would require that he or she provide a written statement, indicating that the beneficiary has elected not to proceed. The bill would provide that if the terms and conditions of the short-pay agreement require approval by the beneficiary of a closing statement prepared by an escrowholder, approval or disapproval shall be provided not more than 4 days after receipt by the beneficiary of the closing statement, or the closing statement shall be deemed approved, except as specified. (5) The Escrow Law provides for licensing and regulation of escrow agents, other than certain exempt persons, by the Commissioner of Corporations. The law requires licensees to apply for membership in the Escrow Agents' Fidelity Corporation, a nonprofit mutual benefit corporation, which is established to indemnify its members against loss of trust obligations. The law limits required membership in the Escrow Agents' Fidelity Corporation who engage in certain kinds of business. Existing law defines and regulates the activities of exchange facilitators and excepts from the definition of exchange facilitator escrow companies, under specified circumstances. This bill would provide escrow transactions that involve money or property held or deposited pursuant to specified actions of an exchange facilitator regarding deposit of funds are not transactions that require a licensee to have membership in the Escrow Agents' Fidelity Corporation.
- Who sponsors SB 306?
- SB 306 is sponsored by Calderon.
- What is the current status of SB 306?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 306?
- Track SB 306 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 306
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 306
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →