Cal-COBRA: premium assistance.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 838 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 838.
You're tracking SB 838
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 838 — Cal-COBRA: premium assistance.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 24, Statutes of 2010.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing federal law, the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA) , requires group health plans providing coverage to employers of 20 or more employees to provide former employees with continuation of benefits, as specified. The federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) provides up to 9 months of premium assistance under COBRA and comparable state continuation coverage programs for certain eligible individuals whose employment was involuntarily terminated between September 1, 2008, and December 31, 2009, as specified. Subsequent federal legislation extends that premium assistance for a specified period of time, makes the assistance available to certain eligible individuals whose employment is involuntarily terminated on or after January 1, 2010, and provides a special election opportunity for certain eligible individuals who experience a reduction in hours followed by an involuntary termination of employment, as specified. Existing federal law requires a plan administrator or other entity involved to provide notices regarding that assistance to certain qualified beneficiaries within specified periods of time. The Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. The California Continuation Benefits Replacement Act (Cal-COBRA) requires health care service plans and health insurers providing group coverage to employers of 2 to 19 employees to offer continuation of that coverage for a specified period of time to certain qualified beneficiaries, as specified. Existing law requires Cal-COBRA plans and insurers to provide notice of the availability of premium assistance under ARRA to qualified beneficiaries who experience a qualifying event between September 1, 2008, and December 31, 2009, as specified. This bill would require those plans and insurers to also provide notice of the availability of premium assistance to qualified beneficiaries who experience a qualifying event between January 1, 2010, and specified dates under federal law and would additionally require plans and insurers to notify qualified beneficiaries eligible for premium assistance of the extension of premium assistance made available by federal law consistent with the notice requirements imposed under that law. The bill would require plans and insurers to give certain qualified beneficiaries whose employment is terminated on or after March 1, 2010, written notice regarding the availability of premium assistance and the special election opportunity provided under ARRA and would allow beneficiaries eligible for that or any other special election opportunity under ARRA to elect continuation coverage within 60 days of the notice required under federal law. The bill would also require plans and insurers to provide information regarding the federal premium assistance and any special election periods under ARRA on their Internet Web sites, as specified, and would apply certain notice requirements to employers of employees whose employment has been terminated on or after March 2, 2010. The bill would authorize the Department of Managed Health Care to designate model notices for purposes of implementing federal premium assistance, as specified, and would make other conforming changes. Because a willful violation of these requirements by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 06/03/10 - Chaptered Current pdf June 03, 2010
- Enrolled 05/24/10 - Enrolled pdf May 24, 2010
- Amended 05/06/10 - Amended Assembly pdf May 06, 2010
- Amended 04/29/10 - Amended Assembly pdf April 29, 2010
- Amended 04/06/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 06, 2010
- Amended 02/16/10 - Amended Senate pdf February 16, 2010
- Introduced 01/05/10 - Introduced pdf January 05, 2010
- SB838 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 24, Statutes of 2010.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 11 a.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 30. Noes 0. Page 3582.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 72. Noes 0. Page 5237.) To Senate.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
(Heard in committee on May 12.)
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.)
-
(May 6 amended version corrected May 10.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in committee on May 4.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
To Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 3194.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 3144.)
-
Set for hearing April 12.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3037.)
-
Set for hearing March 24.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
To Com. on HEALTH.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after February 5.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Alquist · Cosponsor
- Fletcher · Cosponsor
- Monning · Cosponsor
- Tony Strickland · Primary
- Brian W. Jones · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Strickland, Tony Republican
Co-sponsors (4)
- Alquist
- Fletcher
- Monning
- Jones, Brian W. Republican
Not signed on (117)
117 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 117 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 28 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 79% | 0% | 0% | 21% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 74 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 80 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| De | — | Not Voting |
| La | — | Not Voting |
| Torre | — | Not Voting |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| John | — | Not Voting |
| A. | — | Not Voting |
| Perez | — | Not Voting |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Nava | — | Not Voting |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (26)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 838 do?
- Existing federal law, the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA) , requires group health plans providing coverage to employers of 20 or more employees to provide former employees with continuation of benefits, as specified. The federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) provides up to 9 months of premium assistance under COBRA and comparable state continuation coverage programs for certain eligible individuals whose employment was involuntarily terminated between September 1, 2008, and December 31, 2009, as specified. Subsequent federal legislation extends that premium assistance for a specified period of time, makes the assistance available to certain eligible individuals whose employment is involuntarily terminated on or after January 1, 2010, and provides a special election opportunity for certain eligible individuals who experience a reduction in hours followed by an involuntary termination of employment, as specified. Existing federal law requires a plan administrator or other entity involved to provide notices regarding that assistance to certain qualified beneficiaries within specified periods of time. The Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. The California Continuation Benefits Replacement Act (Cal-COBRA) requires health care service plans and health insurers providing group coverage to employers of 2 to 19 employees to offer continuation of that coverage for a specified period of time to certain qualified beneficiaries, as specified. Existing law requires Cal-COBRA plans and insurers to provide notice of the availability of premium assistance under ARRA to qualified beneficiaries who experience a qualifying event between September 1, 2008, and December 31, 2009, as specified. This bill would require those plans and insurers to also provide notice of the availability of premium assistance to qualified beneficiaries who experience a qualifying event between January 1, 2010, and specified dates under federal law and would additionally require plans and insurers to notify qualified beneficiaries eligible for premium assistance of the extension of premium assistance made available by federal law consistent with the notice requirements imposed under that law. The bill would require plans and insurers to give certain qualified beneficiaries whose employment is terminated on or after March 1, 2010, written notice regarding the availability of premium assistance and the special election opportunity provided under ARRA and would allow beneficiaries eligible for that or any other special election opportunity under ARRA to elect continuation coverage within 60 days of the notice required under federal law. The bill would also require plans and insurers to provide information regarding the federal premium assistance and any special election periods under ARRA on their Internet Web sites, as specified, and would apply certain notice requirements to employers of employees whose employment has been terminated on or after March 2, 2010. The bill would authorize the Department of Managed Health Care to designate model notices for purposes of implementing federal premium assistance, as specified, and would make other conforming changes. Because a willful violation of these requirements by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors SB 838?
- SB 838 is sponsored by Alquist, Fletcher, Monning, Strickland, Tony (Republican), and Jones, Brian W. (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 838?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 838?
- Track SB 838 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 838
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 838
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →