California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 993 — State Highway Routes 19 and 66: relinquishment.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 499, Statutes of 2010.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of all state highways. Existing law describes the authorized routes in the state highway system and establishes a process for adoption of a highway on an authorized route by the California Transportation Commission. Existing law authorizes the commission to relinquish certain state highway segments to local agencies. Existing law described the authorized routes of State Highway Routes 19 and 66 and authorizes certain portions of those routes to be relinquished to the specified cities. This bill would authorize the commission to relinquish to the City of Lakewood the portion of State Highway Route 19 within its city limits or sphere of influence under certain conditions. The bill would revise the description of State Highway Route 66 to indicate portions of the route that have been relinquished or that have been authorized to be relinquished, as specified. The bill would also authorize the commission to relinquish to the City of Claremont that portion of State Highway Route 66 within its city limits or sphere of influence under specified conditions. The bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 319 of the Streets and Highways Code proposed by SB 1318, to be operative if SB 1318 and this bill become effective on or before January 1, 2011, and this bill is enacted last.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 499, Statutes of 2010.

  2. Approved by Governor.

  3. Enrolled. To Governor at 11:45 a.m.

  4. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4896.) To enrollment.

  5. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 6503.) To Senate.

  7. Assembly Rule 69(d) suspended. (Page 6463.)

  8. Read third time. Amended. (Page 6429.) To third reading.

  9. Read second time. To third reading.

  10. (Heard in committee on August 12.)

  11. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)

  12. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  13. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  15. (Heard in committee on June 21.)

  16. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  17. To Com. on TRANS.

  18. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  19. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 3741.) To Assembly.

  20. To Special Consent Calendar.

  21. Read second time. To third reading.

  22. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 3670.)

  23. (Suspense - for vote only.)

  24. Set for hearing May 27.

  25. Placed on APPR suspense file.

  26. Set for hearing April 26.

  27. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 3038.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  28. Set for hearing March 23.

  29. To Com. on T. & H.

  30. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 12.

  31. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Huff · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Huff

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 36 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33004
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 36004
% of votes cast 90%0%0%10%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Hollingsworth — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Ashburn — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Leno — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Wiggins — Not Voting
Cedillo — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 89 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 83001
Republican 3000
Democratic 3000
Total 89001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (90)
Member Party Vote
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Furutani — Not Voting
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Bill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Charles — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bass — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Norby — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Adams — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Huber — Yea
Knight — Yea
Ma — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Silva — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Villines — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 18 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 18000
Total 18000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Conway — Yea
Coto — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Miller — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 16 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15000
Republican 1000
Total 16000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Bill — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Miller — Yea
Norby — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Eng — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 36 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33003
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 36003
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Runner — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Romero — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10001
Total 10001
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Cox — Not Voting
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9002
Total 9002
% of votes cast 82%0%0%18%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Cox — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 993 do?
Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of all state highways. Existing law describes the authorized routes in the state highway system and establishes a process for adoption of a highway on an authorized route by the California Transportation Commission. Existing law authorizes the commission to relinquish certain state highway segments to local agencies. Existing law described the authorized routes of State Highway Routes 19 and 66 and authorizes certain portions of those routes to be relinquished to the specified cities. This bill would authorize the commission to relinquish to the City of Lakewood the portion of State Highway Route 19 within its city limits or sphere of influence under certain conditions. The bill would revise the description of State Highway Route 66 to indicate portions of the route that have been relinquished or that have been authorized to be relinquished, as specified. The bill would also authorize the commission to relinquish to the City of Claremont that portion of State Highway Route 66 within its city limits or sphere of influence under specified conditions. The bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 319 of the Streets and Highways Code proposed by SB 1318, to be operative if SB 1318 and this bill become effective on or before January 1, 2011, and this bill is enacted last.
Who sponsors SB 993?
SB 993 is sponsored by Huff.
What is the current status of SB 993?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 993?
Track SB 993 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 993

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 993

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →