California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly 1 D cosponsors

AB 2114 — Aging: Elder Economic Security Standard Index.

Last action — From Senate committee without further action.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law, the Mello-Granlund Older Californians Act, creates the California Department of Aging, with prescribed duties, including the development of the state plan on aging. This bill would require, if specified conditions are met, the department to report data from the Elder Economic Security Standard Index (Elder Index) , as defined, for each service area included in the state plan. Existing law establishes area agencies on aging with specified duties, including creation of a plan for the agencies that considers available data and population trends, assesses the need for services, identifies sources of funding for services, and develops and implements a plan for the delivery of services based on the need. This bill would also require, if specified conditions are met, that the plan utilize the Elder Index to specify the cost of meeting basic needs for elders in each planning and service area, and identify the number or percentage of elders who are living at or below the Elder Index. Existing law, the federal Older Americans Act, provides for various programs, including the Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP) , an employment and training program for employed, low-income seniors. This program is locally administered by area agencies on aging. This bill would require, if specified conditions are met, that the area agencies on aging use the Elder Index to track state-administered SCSEP participants progress toward economic sustainability.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Senate committee without further action.

  2. In committee: Held under submission.

  3. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR suspense file.

  4. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  5. From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 22).

  6. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  7. Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  8. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  9. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 51. Noes 20. Page 4978.)

  10. Read second time. To third reading.

  11. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  12. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (April 21).

  13. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (April 6).

  14. Re-referred to Com. on AGING & L.T.C.

  15. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on AGING & L.T.C. Read second time and amended.

  16. Referred to Com. on AGING & L.T.C.

  17. From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.

  18. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Beall · Primary
  • Salas · Cosponsor
  • Hill · Cosponsor
  • Liu · Cosponsor
  • Joaquin Arambula · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Beall

Co-sponsors (4)

Not signed on (117)

117 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 117 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10001
Total 10001
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Leno — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Emmerson — Yea

Official roll call →

AB 2114 BEALL Assembly Third Reading

Passed 58 Yea · 22 Nay · 11 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5420011
Democratic 3000
Republican 1200
Total 5822011
% of votes cast 64%24%0%12%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Coto — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bass — Yea
Beall — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Cook — Not Voting
DeVore — Nay
Tom — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Audra — Nay
Bill — Not Voting
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuller — Nay
John — Not Voting
A. — Not Voting
Perez — Not Voting
Furutani — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Not Voting
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Hall — Not Voting
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Norby — Nay
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Not Voting
Villines — Yea
Adams — Nay
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Conway — Not Voting
Emmerson — Not Voting
Eng — Yea
Davis — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 13 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12500
Democratic 1000
Total 13500
% of votes cast 72%28%0%0%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Conway — Nay
Charles — Yea
Hall — Yea
Miller — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Norby — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Nava — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Passed 5 Yea · 1 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5103
Total 5103
% of votes cast 56%11%0%33%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Not Voting
Manuel — Not Voting
Perez — Not Voting
Nestande — Yea
Norby — Nay
Torres — Yea
Yamada — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety labor health-insurance
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2114 do?
Existing law, the Mello-Granlund Older Californians Act, creates the California Department of Aging, with prescribed duties, including the development of the state plan on aging. This bill would require, if specified conditions are met, the department to report data from the Elder Economic Security Standard Index (Elder Index) , as defined, for each service area included in the state plan. Existing law establishes area agencies on aging with specified duties, including creation of a plan for the agencies that considers available data and population trends, assesses the need for services, identifies sources of funding for services, and develops and implements a plan for the delivery of services based on the need. This bill would also require, if specified conditions are met, that the plan utilize the Elder Index to specify the cost of meeting basic needs for elders in each planning and service area, and identify the number or percentage of elders who are living at or below the Elder Index. Existing law, the federal Older Americans Act, provides for various programs, including the Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP) , an employment and training program for employed, low-income seniors. This program is locally administered by area agencies on aging. This bill would require, if specified conditions are met, that the area agencies on aging use the Elder Index to track state-administered SCSEP participants progress toward economic sustainability.
Who sponsors AB 2114?
AB 2114 is sponsored by Beall, Salas, Hill, Liu, and Arambula, Joaquin (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 2114?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2114?
Track AB 2114 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2114

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 2114

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →