California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 402 — Recycling: California redemption value.

Last action — Stricken from Senate file.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law, the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act (act) , requires that every beverage container sold or offered for sale in this state is required to have a minimum refund value. A distributor is required to pay a redemption payment for every beverage container sold or offered for sale in the state to the Department of Conservation and the department is required to deposit those amounts in the California Beverage Container Recycling Fund. The money in the fund is continuously appropriated to the department to pay refund values, administrative fees to processors, and a reserve for contingencies. A violation of the act is a crime. "Beverage" is defined, for purposes of the act, to include, among other things, beer and other malt beverages, wine and distilled spirit coolers, carbonated mineral and soda waters, noncarbonated fruit drinks, and vegetable juices, in liquid form that are intended for human consumption, but excludes from that definition vegetable drinks in beverage containers of more than 16 ounces. The act also excludes, from the definition of beverage, any product sold in a container that is not an aluminum beverage container, a glass container, a plastic beverage container, or a bimetal container. This bill would, as of July 1, 2010, revise the term beverage to include vegetable, fruit, nut, grain, or soy drinks or juices or noncarbonated drinks that contain any percentage of those drinks or juices, and would delete the requirement that a vegetable, drink, subject to the act, be sold in a container of 16 ounces or less. The bill would delete the exclusion from the term beverage, for a product that is not sold in the above-specified types of containers. The bill would additionally exclude from the definition a beverage in a flexible foil, plastic pouch, or aseptic container delivering 7 or less fluid ounces. Since the additional payments for the plastic beverage containers and other beverage containers that this bill would make subject to the act would be deposited in a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would also impose a state-mandated local program by creating new crimes relating to beverage containers. (2) Existing law requires a distributor of specified beverage containers to pay a redemption payment to the Department of Conservation for each beverage container sold or transferred for deposit in the California Beverage Container Recycling Fund. The money in the fund is continuously appropriated to the department to pay refund values, administrative fees to processors, and a reserve for contingencies. This bill would raise the amount of the redemption payment paid by the distributor and the refund value, as specified. Since the increased payments for the beverage containers that are subject to the act would be deposited in a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. Existing law requires that a distributor pay the redemption payment not later than the last day of the 3rd month following the sale and authorizes a distributor, upon the approval of the department, to elect to make a single annual payment if the distributor meets specified conditions and notifies the department of its intent to make annual redemption payments. This bill would require all beverage distributors to make the redemption payment no later than the last day of the 2nd month following the sale of the beverages. This bill would revise the conditions under which a distributor would be authorized to make a single annual payment. The bill would also authorize a distributor to withhold payment of redemption payments until the next payment period when the distributor has not received payment for beverage containers on which redemption payments are owed. (3) Existing law requires certified recycling centers to accept any empty beverage container from a consumer or dropoff or collection program and pay the refund value, which can be based on weight. This bill would provide, with exceptions, that a recycling center that does not receive handling fees is not required to redeem empty beverage containers of a container type not included in the program before July 1, 2009. (4) The department is authorized to make specified expenditures from the moneys remaining in the fund after the moneys for certain purposes have been set aside. This bill would increase the amount of moneys for grants to certified community conservation corps for beverage container litter reduction programs and recycling programs. The bill would suspend, for the 2009–10 fiscal year, expenditures for grants for beverage container recycling and litter reduction programs and a statewide public education and information campaign aimed at promoting increased recycling of beverage containers. The bill would eliminate funds the department is authorized to expend for grants for specified beverage container recycling and litter reduction programs. The bill would require the department, if there are any reductions in certain expenditures due to insufficient funds, on or after July 1, 2009, to provide, subject to the availability of funds, retroactive full funding, on or before July 1, 2010. The bill would require the department, for any reduction in expenditures that resulted in a reduction in the amount of funds available to make processing payments and an increase in processing fees paid by manufacturers, to credit beverage manufacturers for any overpayment of processing fees, subject to the availability of funds. (5) Existing law requires the department to continuously assist dealers and recyclers to establish certified recycling centers within in each convenience zone. This bill would provide assistance and incentives to reduce the number of zones not serviced by a certified recycling center. (6) Existing law requires that regulations governing solid waste facilities include standards for design, operation, maintenance, and ultimate reuse of solid waste facilities. This bill would prohibit those regulations from including any requirements for processors or recyclers, as defined, where the amount of outgoing solid waste is 15% or less of the total amount of incoming material received by weight calculated on a monthly basis after reasonable adjustment for the weight of moisture, and the amount of putrescible wastes in the outgoing solid waste shall be 3% or less of the amount of incoming material received by weight calculated on a monthly basis. (7) The bill would delete obsolete provisions and make conforming changes. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Stricken from Senate file.

  2. In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)

  3. Vetoed by Governor.

  4. Enrolled. To Governor at 1 p.m.

  5. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 22. Noes 14. Page 2432.) To enrollment.

  6. In Senate.

  7. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 58. Noes 16. Page 3379.) To Senate.

  8. Amended.

  9. Read second time.

  10. (Heard in committee on September 11.)

  11. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.)

  12. Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 3302.)

  13. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  14. Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 3056.)

  15. Re-referred to Com. On NAT. RES. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.

  16. Read third time. Amended. (Page 3038.)

  17. Read second time. To third reading.

  18. (Received by Desk on August 28 pursuant to Joint Rule 61(a)(11).)

  19. (Heard in committee on August 27.)

  20. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)

  21. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  22. (Heard in committee on July 6.)

  23. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  24. Set, first hearing. Referred to REV. & TAX. suspense file.

  25. To Com. on REV. & TAX.

  26. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  27. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 23. Noes 16. Page 1111.) To Assembly.

  28. Read second time. To third reading.

  29. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 5. Page 1071.)

  30. (Suspense - for vote only.)

  31. Set for hearing May 28.

  32. Placed on APPR suspense file.

  33. Set for hearing May 18.

  34. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  35. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  36. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 638.)

  37. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.

  38. Set for hearing April 22.

  39. To Coms. on REV. & TAX. and RLS.

  40. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 28.

  41. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Chesbro · Cosponsor
  • Corbett · Cosponsor
  • Skinner · Cosponsor
  • Wolk · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Wolk

Co-sponsors (3)

  • Chesbro
  • Corbett
  • Skinner

Not signed on (118)

118 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 118 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Supp 2 SB402 Wolk

Passed 22 Yea · 15 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 201503
Democratic 2000
Republican 0001
Total 221504
% of votes cast 54%37%0%10%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Harman — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Huff — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Negrete — Nay
Runner — Nay
Ducheny — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Nay
Dutton — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Benoit — Nay
Oropeza — Yea
Price — Yea
Romero — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Aanestad — Nay
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Nay
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 60 Yea · 26 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 562405
Democratic 3000
Republican 1200
Total 602605
% of votes cast 66%29%0%5%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Block — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nava — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Not Voting
Fuller — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Knight — Nay
Logue — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Villines — Nay
Tom — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Audra — Nay
Bill — Not Voting
Adams — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Miller — Not Voting
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Silva — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Tran — Nay
Emmerson — Not Voting
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Gilmore — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 69 Yea · 16 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 651505
Democratic 3000
Republican 1101
Total 691606
% of votes cast 76%18%0%7%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Nay
Bill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Charles — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Hall — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Coto — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Krekorian — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Davis — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Audra — Not Voting
Garrick — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Cook — Not Voting
Knight — Nay
Miller — Not Voting
Nestande — Nay
Silva — Nay
Tran — Nay
Villines — Nay
Adams — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Not Voting
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Emmerson — Not Voting
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Furutani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9001
Total 9001
% of votes cast 90%0%0%10%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Not Voting
Logue — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Gilmore — Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 16 Yea · 6 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15500
Democratic 1000
Republican 0100
Total 16600
% of votes cast 73%27%0%0%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Nay
Fuentes — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hill — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Miller — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Conway — Nay
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 24 Yea · 16 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 221500
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 241600
% of votes cast 60%40%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Florez — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Runner — Nay
Harman — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Benoit — Nay
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Nay
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wright — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Nay
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 7 Yea · 5 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7501
Total 7501
% of votes cast 54%38%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Runner — Nay
Hancock — Yea
Leno — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Runner — Yea
Leno — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Walters — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 402 do?
(1) Existing law, the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act (act) , requires that every beverage container sold or offered for sale in this state is required to have a minimum refund value. A distributor is required to pay a redemption payment for every beverage container sold or offered for sale in the state to the Department of Conservation and the department is required to deposit those amounts in the California Beverage Container Recycling Fund. The money in the fund is continuously appropriated to the department to pay refund values, administrative fees to processors, and a reserve for contingencies. A violation of the act is a crime. "Beverage" is defined, for purposes of the act, to include, among other things, beer and other malt beverages, wine and distilled spirit coolers, carbonated mineral and soda waters, noncarbonated fruit drinks, and vegetable juices, in liquid form that are intended for human consumption, but excludes from that definition vegetable drinks in beverage containers of more than 16 ounces. The act also excludes, from the definition of beverage, any product sold in a container that is not an aluminum beverage container, a glass container, a plastic beverage container, or a bimetal container. This bill would, as of July 1, 2010, revise the term beverage to include vegetable, fruit, nut, grain, or soy drinks or juices or noncarbonated drinks that contain any percentage of those drinks or juices, and would delete the requirement that a vegetable, drink, subject to the act, be sold in a container of 16 ounces or less. The bill would delete the exclusion from the term beverage, for a product that is not sold in the above-specified types of containers. The bill would additionally exclude from the definition a beverage in a flexible foil, plastic pouch, or aseptic container delivering 7 or less fluid ounces. Since the additional payments for the plastic beverage containers and other beverage containers that this bill would make subject to the act would be deposited in a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would also impose a state-mandated local program by creating new crimes relating to beverage containers. (2) Existing law requires a distributor of specified beverage containers to pay a redemption payment to the Department of Conservation for each beverage container sold or transferred for deposit in the California Beverage Container Recycling Fund. The money in the fund is continuously appropriated to the department to pay refund values, administrative fees to processors, and a reserve for contingencies. This bill would raise the amount of the redemption payment paid by the distributor and the refund value, as specified. Since the increased payments for the beverage containers that are subject to the act would be deposited in a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. Existing law requires that a distributor pay the redemption payment not later than the last day of the 3rd month following the sale and authorizes a distributor, upon the approval of the department, to elect to make a single annual payment if the distributor meets specified conditions and notifies the department of its intent to make annual redemption payments. This bill would require all beverage distributors to make the redemption payment no later than the last day of the 2nd month following the sale of the beverages. This bill would revise the conditions under which a distributor would be authorized to make a single annual payment. The bill would also authorize a distributor to withhold payment of redemption payments until the next payment period when the distributor has not received payment for beverage containers on which redemption payments are owed. (3) Existing law requires certified recycling centers to accept any empty beverage container from a consumer or dropoff or collection program and pay the refund value, which can be based on weight. This bill would provide, with exceptions, that a recycling center that does not receive handling fees is not required to redeem empty beverage containers of a container type not included in the program before July 1, 2009. (4) The department is authorized to make specified expenditures from the moneys remaining in the fund after the moneys for certain purposes have been set aside. This bill would increase the amount of moneys for grants to certified community conservation corps for beverage container litter reduction programs and recycling programs. The bill would suspend, for the 2009–10 fiscal year, expenditures for grants for beverage container recycling and litter reduction programs and a statewide public education and information campaign aimed at promoting increased recycling of beverage containers. The bill would eliminate funds the department is authorized to expend for grants for specified beverage container recycling and litter reduction programs. The bill would require the department, if there are any reductions in certain expenditures due to insufficient funds, on or after July 1, 2009, to provide, subject to the availability of funds, retroactive full funding, on or before July 1, 2010. The bill would require the department, for any reduction in expenditures that resulted in a reduction in the amount of funds available to make processing payments and an increase in processing fees paid by manufacturers, to credit beverage manufacturers for any overpayment of processing fees, subject to the availability of funds. (5) Existing law requires the department to continuously assist dealers and recyclers to establish certified recycling centers within in each convenience zone. This bill would provide assistance and incentives to reduce the number of zones not serviced by a certified recycling center. (6) Existing law requires that regulations governing solid waste facilities include standards for design, operation, maintenance, and ultimate reuse of solid waste facilities. This bill would prohibit those regulations from including any requirements for processors or recyclers, as defined, where the amount of outgoing solid waste is 15% or less of the total amount of incoming material received by weight calculated on a monthly basis after reasonable adjustment for the weight of moisture, and the amount of putrescible wastes in the outgoing solid waste shall be 3% or less of the amount of incoming material received by weight calculated on a monthly basis. (7) The bill would delete obsolete provisions and make conforming changes. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors SB 402?
SB 402 is sponsored by Chesbro, Corbett, Skinner, and Wolk.
What is the current status of SB 402?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 402?
Track SB 402 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 402

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 402

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →