California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 122 — Tribal gaming: compact ratification.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 3, Statutes of 2010.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 15, 2009. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing federal law, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, provides for the negotiation and execution of tribal-state gaming compacts for the purpose of authorizing certain types of gaming on Indian lands within a state. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to negotiate and conclude compacts, subject to ratification by the Legislature. Existing law expressly ratifies a number of tribal-state gaming compacts, and amendments of tribal-state gaming compacts, between the State of California and specified Indian tribes. This bill would ratify the tribal-state gaming compact entered into between the State of California and the Pinoleville Pomo Nation, executed on March 10, 2009. The bill would require that related revenue contributions be deposited into the General Fund, except as specified, and would also provide that, in deference to tribal sovereignty, certain actions may not be deemed projects for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 3, Statutes of 2010.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and to the Governor at 11:50 a.m.

  4. Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 63. Noes 2. Page 3859.)

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after January 6 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed and to Assembly. (Ayes 30. Noes 4. Page 2606.)

  7. Ordered to third reading.

  8. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  9. Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  10. Senate Rule 29.3 suspended.

  11. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  12. Referred to Com. on ED.

  13. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  14. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 51. Noes 24. Page 2029.)

  15. Read second time. To third reading.

  16. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  17. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).

  18. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  19. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  20. Read second time and amended.

  21. From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (April 1).

  22. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  23. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.

  24. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  25. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.

  26. Referred to Com. on ED.

  27. From printer. May be heard in committee February 15.

  28. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Coto · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Coto

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 122 COTO Concurrence- Urgency Added

Passed 72 Yea · 2 Nay · 16 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 682014
Democratic 1002
Republican 3000
Total 722016
% of votes cast 80%2%0%18%
How each member voted (90)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Not Voting
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Bill — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Tom — Not Voting
Charles — Not Voting
Bonnie — Not Voting
Lowenthal — Not Voting
Carter — Not Voting
Furutani — Not Voting
Harkey — Not Voting
Huffman — Nay
Logue — Nay
Nestande — Not Voting
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Knight — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Adams — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Yea
Villines — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Ma — Not Voting
Mendoza — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Eng — Not Voting
Davis — Not Voting
Yamada — Not Voting
Fuentes — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Assembly 3rd Reading AB122 Coto Urgency Clause

Passed 31 Yea · 4 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 28405
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 31405
% of votes cast 78%10%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cogdill — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Florez — Yea
Hancock — Not Voting
Hollingsworth — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Ducheny — Not Voting
Kehoe — Nay
Dutton — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Not Voting
Harman — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Pavley — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Nay
Cedillo — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Nay
Denham — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

AB 122 COTO Assembly Third Reading

Passed 59 Yea · 27 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 562505
Democratic 2001
Republican 1200
Total 592706
% of votes cast 64%29%0%7%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Eng — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Yamada — Not Voting
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Bill — Nay
Tom — Nay
Fuentes — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Audra — Nay
Garrick — Yea
Charles — Not Voting
Hagman — Nay
Hall — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
Duvall — Not Voting
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Not Voting
Krekorian — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Price — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Nay
Adams — Nay
Bass — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Not Voting
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Silva — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Villines — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Coto — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Evans — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Furutani — Yea
Gilmore — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 16 Yea · 6 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15500
Democratic 1000
Republican 0100
Total 16600
% of votes cast 73%27%0%0%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Nay
Hall — Yea
Davis — Yea
Duvall — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Krekorian — Yea
Miller — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Price — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety finance
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 122 do?
Existing federal law, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, provides for the negotiation and execution of tribal-state gaming compacts for the purpose of authorizing certain types of gaming on Indian lands within a state. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to negotiate and conclude compacts, subject to ratification by the Legislature. Existing law expressly ratifies a number of tribal-state gaming compacts, and amendments of tribal-state gaming compacts, between the State of California and specified Indian tribes. This bill would ratify the tribal-state gaming compact entered into between the State of California and the Pinoleville Pomo Nation, executed on March 10, 2009. The bill would require that related revenue contributions be deposited into the General Fund, except as specified, and would also provide that, in deference to tribal sovereignty, certain actions may not be deemed projects for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors AB 122?
AB 122 is sponsored by Coto.
What is the current status of AB 122?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 15, 2009. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 122?
Track AB 122 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 122

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 122

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →