California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 68 — Community redevelopment: Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 652, Statutes of 2009.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) The Community Redevelopment Law authorizes the establishment of redevelopment agencies in communities to address the effects of blight, as defined, in blighted areas in those communities known as project areas. Specific provisions of the California Constitution authorize a redevelopment agency to receive funding through tax increments attributable to increases in assessed property tax valuation of property in a project area due to redevelopment. Not less than 20% of tax increments generated from a project area are required to be used by a redevelopment agency to increase and improve the community's supply of low- and moderate-income housing. Redevelopment agencies are required in the 2009–10 fiscal year to remit to the county auditor an amount of revenue for deposit in the Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund in each county for allocation to school entities. Existing law authorizes the agency, in order to make the full allocation, to borrow the amount required to be allocated to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund, pursuant to existing law, unless executed contracts exist that would be impaired if the agency reduced the amount allocated to that fund. This bill would additionally authorize an agency, in order to make the required allocation to the county Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund, to borrow any moneys in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund under the same condition. (2) Under existing law, the amount of revenue a redevelopment agency is required to remit to the county auditor during the 2009–10 and 2010–11 fiscal years is determined in accordance with specified calculations made by the Director of Finance and is based, in part, on a specified report of the Controller. This bill would make an adjustment to the calculation made by the Director of Finance with respect to a redevelopment agency that, prior to August 1, 2009, deleted territory from any project area and reported to the State Board of Equalization in accordance with existing law and that deletion is not reflected in certain described reports. (3) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 652, Statutes of 2009.

  2. Approved by Governor.

  3. Enrolled. To Governor at 2:30 p.m.

  4. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 30. Noes 5. Page 2554.) To enrollment.

  5. Urgency clause adopted.

  6. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  7. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 56. Noes 12. Page 3583.) To Senate.

  8. Read third time. Amended. (Page 3579.)

  9. Read second time. To third reading.

  10. Read second time. Amended. To second reading.

  11. (Heard in committee on September 11.)

  12. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 4.)

  13. Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Ayes 47. Noes 26. Page 3380.)

  14. Re-referred to Com. On W.,P. & W. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.

  15. Read third time. Amended. (Page 3039.) To third reading.

  16. From inactive file to third reading file.

  17. Notice of motion to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Krekorian.

  18. Placed on inactive file on request of Assembly Member Krekorian.

  19. Read second time. To third reading.

  20. Placed on second reading file.

  21. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  22. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 14. Page 511.) To Assembly.

  23. Read second time. To third reading.

  24. Placed on second reading file.

  25. Withdrawn from committee.

  26. To Com. on RLS.

  27. Read first time.

  28. From print. May be acted upon on or after February 20.

  29. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Business SB68 Committee on B. & F.R. (Ducheny) Urgency Clause

Passed 31 Yea · 5 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 28505
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 31505
% of votes cast 76%12%0%12%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Florez — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Benoit — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Romero — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Correa — Not Voting
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

SB 68 B.& F. R. Third Reading Urgency By EVANS

Passed 66 Yea · 12 Nay · 13 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6211012
Democratic 2001
Republican 2100
Total 6612013
% of votes cast 73%13%0%14%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Not Voting
Carter — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Charles — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nava — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Cook — Not Voting
Bill — Not Voting
Tom — Not Voting
Harkey — Nay
Jeffries — Not Voting
Knight — Nay
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Not Voting
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Yea
Beall — Not Voting
Miller — Nay
Nestande — Not Voting
Silva — Not Voting
Swanson — Nay
Villines — Nay
Adams — Not Voting
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Conway — Nay
Emmerson — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 11 Yea · 5 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 2000
Unaffiliated 9501
Total 11501
% of votes cast 65%29%0%6%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Yamada — Nay
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Tom — Nay
Fletcher — Not Voting
Huffman — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Senate 3rd Reading SB68 Committee on B. & F.R. (Ducheny)

Passed 23 Yea · 14 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211302
Democratic 2001
Republican 0100
Total 231403
% of votes cast 58%35%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Wyland — Nay
Negrete — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Florez — Yea
Harman — Nay
Runner — Nay
Ducheny — Yea
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Benoit — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Maldonado — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Wright — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety housing education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 68 do?
(1) The Community Redevelopment Law authorizes the establishment of redevelopment agencies in communities to address the effects of blight, as defined, in blighted areas in those communities known as project areas. Specific provisions of the California Constitution authorize a redevelopment agency to receive funding through tax increments attributable to increases in assessed property tax valuation of property in a project area due to redevelopment. Not less than 20% of tax increments generated from a project area are required to be used by a redevelopment agency to increase and improve the community's supply of low- and moderate-income housing. Redevelopment agencies are required in the 2009–10 fiscal year to remit to the county auditor an amount of revenue for deposit in the Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund in each county for allocation to school entities. Existing law authorizes the agency, in order to make the full allocation, to borrow the amount required to be allocated to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund, pursuant to existing law, unless executed contracts exist that would be impaired if the agency reduced the amount allocated to that fund. This bill would additionally authorize an agency, in order to make the required allocation to the county Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund, to borrow any moneys in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund under the same condition. (2) Under existing law, the amount of revenue a redevelopment agency is required to remit to the county auditor during the 2009–10 and 2010–11 fiscal years is determined in accordance with specified calculations made by the Director of Finance and is based, in part, on a specified report of the Controller. This bill would make an adjustment to the calculation made by the Director of Finance with respect to a redevelopment agency that, prior to August 1, 2009, deleted territory from any project area and reported to the State Board of Equalization in accordance with existing law and that deletion is not reflected in certain described reports. (3) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors SB 68?
SB 68 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
What is the current status of SB 68?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 68?
Track SB 68 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 68

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 68

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →