Food stamps: eligibility: drug felonies.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1756 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1756.
You're tracking AB 1756
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1756 — Food stamps: eligibility: drug felonies.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides for the Food Stamp program, under which food stamps allocated to the state by the federal government under the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, are distributed to eligible individuals by each county. Existing law provides that a person convicted of a drug-related felony, with certain exceptions, is eligible for aid under the Food Stamp program, if specified requirements are met. This bill would, instead, provide that a person convicted of any drug felony shall be eligible for aid under the Food Stamp program, and would eliminate the above-referenced eligibility requirements. By changing the eligibility standards under the Food Stamp program, this bill would increase the responsibilities of counties in the administration of the program, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/05/10 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 05, 2010
- Introduced 02/08/10 - Introduced pdf February 08, 2010
- AB1756 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 22).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 44. Noes 31. Page 5129.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 5.) (April 28).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (April 13).
-
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 11.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Swanson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Swanson
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 49 | 32 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 53 | 34 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 37% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Portantino | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 11 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 26% | 0% | 16% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Not Voting |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 29% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1756 do?
- Existing law provides for the Food Stamp program, under which food stamps allocated to the state by the federal government under the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, are distributed to eligible individuals by each county. Existing law provides that a person convicted of a drug-related felony, with certain exceptions, is eligible for aid under the Food Stamp program, if specified requirements are met. This bill would, instead, provide that a person convicted of any drug felony shall be eligible for aid under the Food Stamp program, and would eliminate the above-referenced eligibility requirements. By changing the eligibility standards under the Food Stamp program, this bill would increase the responsibilities of counties in the administration of the program, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 1756?
- AB 1756 is sponsored by Swanson.
- What is the current status of AB 1756?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1756?
- Track AB 1756 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1756
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1756
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →