Medi-Cal: eligibility.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1269 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1269.
You're tracking AB 1269
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1269 — Medi-Cal: eligibility.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 282, Statutes of 2009.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2009. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which basic health care services are provided to qualified low-income persons. The Medi-Cal program is partially governed and funded by federal Medicaid provisions. Existing law, subject to the receipt of federal financial participation, requires the department to adopt a federal option under which any employed individual with a disability who meets specified income and resource requirements, shall be eligible for benefits under the Medi-Cal program, subject to the payment of premiums. This bill would, to the extent that federal financial participation is available, authorize an individual who is otherwise eligible under this program but who is temporarily unemployed to elect to remain on Medi-Cal pursuant to these provisions for a period up to 26 weeks, as provided. This bill would also provide additional resource exemptions in determining Medi-Cal eligibility under these provisions. The bill would extend specified resource exemptions to apply for the beneficiary under any other Medi-Cal program under which the beneficiary later becomes eligible for medical assistance where that eligibility is based on age, blindness, or disability. This bill would make its provisions operative 30 days after the date that the increase in the state's federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP) pursuant to the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) is no longer available. Existing law requires individuals who are eligible for Medi-Cal benefits pursuant to these provisions to be subject to premiums that are determined by a sliding scale that is based on countable income, as provided. This bill, not later than 90 days after the operative date specified above, would instead require each individual to pay a monthly premium that is equal to 5% of his or her individual or spousal countable income, as described, except that the premium cannot fall below or exceed a specified minimum and maximum premium payment, as provided. The bill would require the above-described provisions to be implemented only to the extent that federal financial participation is available, and only to the extent that the department seeks and obtains approval of all necessary state plan amendments. Because counties are required to make Medi-Cal eligibility determinations and this bill would extend the expansion of Medi-Cal eligibility, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/11/09 - Enrolled pdf September 11, 2009
- Amended 09/01/09 - Amended Senate pdf September 01, 2009
- Amended 04/14/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 14, 2009
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
- AB1269 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 282, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 11:30 a.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 3225.)
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 50. Noes 26. Page 3191.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 10 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 26. Noes 12. Page 2209.)
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 5.) (August 27).
-
In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.
-
(Page 1804.)
-
Joint Rule 62(a) suspended.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 3.) (July 8).
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 50. Noes 29. Page 1940.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 13. Noes 6.) (April 21).
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Brownley · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Brownley
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 54 | 28 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 58 | 30 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 33% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Not Voting |
| Smyth | — | Not Voting |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 12 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 66% | 29% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Benoit | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 38% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 25% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 55 | 30 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 59 | 32 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 35% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (26)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Gaines | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1269 do?
- Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which basic health care services are provided to qualified low-income persons. The Medi-Cal program is partially governed and funded by federal Medicaid provisions. Existing law, subject to the receipt of federal financial participation, requires the department to adopt a federal option under which any employed individual with a disability who meets specified income and resource requirements, shall be eligible for benefits under the Medi-Cal program, subject to the payment of premiums. This bill would, to the extent that federal financial participation is available, authorize an individual who is otherwise eligible under this program but who is temporarily unemployed to elect to remain on Medi-Cal pursuant to these provisions for a period up to 26 weeks, as provided. This bill would also provide additional resource exemptions in determining Medi-Cal eligibility under these provisions. The bill would extend specified resource exemptions to apply for the beneficiary under any other Medi-Cal program under which the beneficiary later becomes eligible for medical assistance where that eligibility is based on age, blindness, or disability. This bill would make its provisions operative 30 days after the date that the increase in the state's federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP) pursuant to the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) is no longer available. Existing law requires individuals who are eligible for Medi-Cal benefits pursuant to these provisions to be subject to premiums that are determined by a sliding scale that is based on countable income, as provided. This bill, not later than 90 days after the operative date specified above, would instead require each individual to pay a monthly premium that is equal to 5% of his or her individual or spousal countable income, as described, except that the premium cannot fall below or exceed a specified minimum and maximum premium payment, as provided. The bill would require the above-described provisions to be implemented only to the extent that federal financial participation is available, and only to the extent that the department seeks and obtains approval of all necessary state plan amendments. Because counties are required to make Medi-Cal eligibility determinations and this bill would extend the expansion of Medi-Cal eligibility, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 1269?
- AB 1269 is sponsored by Brownley.
- What is the current status of AB 1269?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2009. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1269?
- Track AB 1269 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1269
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1269
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →