California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 1269 — Medi-Cal: eligibility.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 282, Statutes of 2009.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2009. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which basic health care services are provided to qualified low-income persons. The Medi-Cal program is partially governed and funded by federal Medicaid provisions. Existing law, subject to the receipt of federal financial participation, requires the department to adopt a federal option under which any employed individual with a disability who meets specified income and resource requirements, shall be eligible for benefits under the Medi-Cal program, subject to the payment of premiums. This bill would, to the extent that federal financial participation is available, authorize an individual who is otherwise eligible under this program but who is temporarily unemployed to elect to remain on Medi-Cal pursuant to these provisions for a period up to 26 weeks, as provided. This bill would also provide additional resource exemptions in determining Medi-Cal eligibility under these provisions. The bill would extend specified resource exemptions to apply for the beneficiary under any other Medi-Cal program under which the beneficiary later becomes eligible for medical assistance where that eligibility is based on age, blindness, or disability. This bill would make its provisions operative 30 days after the date that the increase in the state's federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP) pursuant to the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) is no longer available. Existing law requires individuals who are eligible for Medi-Cal benefits pursuant to these provisions to be subject to premiums that are determined by a sliding scale that is based on countable income, as provided. This bill, not later than 90 days after the operative date specified above, would instead require each individual to pay a monthly premium that is equal to 5% of his or her individual or spousal countable income, as described, except that the premium cannot fall below or exceed a specified minimum and maximum premium payment, as provided. The bill would require the above-described provisions to be implemented only to the extent that federal financial participation is available, and only to the extent that the department seeks and obtains approval of all necessary state plan amendments. Because counties are required to make Medi-Cal eligibility determinations and this bill would extend the expansion of Medi-Cal eligibility, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 282, Statutes of 2009.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and to the Governor at 11:30 a.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 3225.)

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 50. Noes 26. Page 3191.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 10 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 26. Noes 12. Page 2209.)

  8. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  9. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 5.) (August 27).

  10. In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.

  11. (Page 1804.)

  12. Joint Rule 62(a) suspended.

  13. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 3.) (July 8).

  14. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  15. Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  16. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  17. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 50. Noes 29. Page 1940.)

  18. Read second time. To third reading.

  19. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).

  20. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  21. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 13. Noes 6.) (April 21).

  22. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  23. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.

  24. Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  25. Read first time.

  26. From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.

  27. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Brownley · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Brownley

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 58 Yea · 30 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 542803
Republican 1200
Democratic 3000
Total 583003
% of votes cast 64%33%0%3%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Eng — Yea
Evans — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Bill — Nay
Tom — Nay
Fuentes — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Audra — Nay
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Nay
Krekorian — Yea
Logue — Nay
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Nay
Charles — Yea
Beall — Yea
Duvall — Not Voting
Smyth — Not Voting
Villines — Nay
Adams — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mendoza — Not Voting
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Carter — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Coto — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gilmore — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 27 Yea · 12 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 251102
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 271202
% of votes cast 66%29%0%5%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Nay
Cedillo — Yea
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Runner — Nay
Ashburn — Nay
Benoit — Not Voting
Dutton — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Hollingsworth — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Cogdill — Nay
Correa — Yea
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 8 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8500
Total 8500
% of votes cast 62%38%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Runner — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Price — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Cox — Nay
Denham — Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Cox — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Runner — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Price — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 59 Yea · 32 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 553001
Democratic 3000
Republican 1200
Total 593201
% of votes cast 64%35%0%1%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Cook — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Charles — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Beall — Yea
Coto — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Price — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Conway — Nay
Bill — Nay
Tom — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Audra — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Gilmore — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Huber — Nay
DeVore — Nay
Duvall — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Logue — Nay
Miller — Nay
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Nay
Adams — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Block — Not Voting
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Knight — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Villines — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 16 Yea · 6 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15500
Democratic 1000
Republican 0100
Total 16600
% of votes cast 73%27%0%0%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Nay
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Duvall — Nay
Krekorian — Yea
Miller — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Price — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 19 Yea · 7 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 17600
Republican 1100
Democratic 1000
Total 19700
% of votes cast 73%27%0%0%
How each member voted (26)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
Hall — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Gaines — Nay
Audra — Nay
Conway — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Nava — Yea
Adams — Nay
Block — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1269 do?
Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which basic health care services are provided to qualified low-income persons. The Medi-Cal program is partially governed and funded by federal Medicaid provisions. Existing law, subject to the receipt of federal financial participation, requires the department to adopt a federal option under which any employed individual with a disability who meets specified income and resource requirements, shall be eligible for benefits under the Medi-Cal program, subject to the payment of premiums. This bill would, to the extent that federal financial participation is available, authorize an individual who is otherwise eligible under this program but who is temporarily unemployed to elect to remain on Medi-Cal pursuant to these provisions for a period up to 26 weeks, as provided. This bill would also provide additional resource exemptions in determining Medi-Cal eligibility under these provisions. The bill would extend specified resource exemptions to apply for the beneficiary under any other Medi-Cal program under which the beneficiary later becomes eligible for medical assistance where that eligibility is based on age, blindness, or disability. This bill would make its provisions operative 30 days after the date that the increase in the state's federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP) pursuant to the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) is no longer available. Existing law requires individuals who are eligible for Medi-Cal benefits pursuant to these provisions to be subject to premiums that are determined by a sliding scale that is based on countable income, as provided. This bill, not later than 90 days after the operative date specified above, would instead require each individual to pay a monthly premium that is equal to 5% of his or her individual or spousal countable income, as described, except that the premium cannot fall below or exceed a specified minimum and maximum premium payment, as provided. The bill would require the above-described provisions to be implemented only to the extent that federal financial participation is available, and only to the extent that the department seeks and obtains approval of all necessary state plan amendments. Because counties are required to make Medi-Cal eligibility determinations and this bill would extend the expansion of Medi-Cal eligibility, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors AB 1269?
AB 1269 is sponsored by Brownley.
What is the current status of AB 1269?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2009. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1269?
Track AB 1269 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1269

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1269

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →