AB 1981 — Recycling: waste tires: fees.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) The California Tire Recycling Act requires a person who purchases a new tire to pay a California tire fee and the revenue generated from the fee is deposited in the California Tire Recycling Management Fund, for expenditure by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for programs related to the disposal of waste tires, except that a specified amount of the fee is designated for programs and projects that mitigate or remediate air pollution caused by waste tires. The tire fee is imposed upon, among other things, a new tire sold with a new or used motor vehicle, including the spare tire. Existing law authorizes the department to enter into a contract with the State Board of Equalization to collect the fee pursuant to the Fee Collection Procedures Law, which provides for criminal penalties for certain violations of that law. This bill would exclude, from the tire fee, a tire on a vehicle that is sold or leased by a new motor vehicle dealer. The bill would instead require a person who purchases or leases those vehicles to pay a California vehicle tire fee and would require the retail vehicle seller, as defined, to collect the California vehicle tire fee. The retail vehicle seller would be required to remit the fee, except as specified, to the state for deposit in the California Tire Recycling Management Fund. The bill would also make conforming changes with regard to the vehicle tire fee, including conforming changes to the Automobile Sales Finance Act. The bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating new crimes with regard to the collection of the California new vehicle tire fee. The bill would require the State Board of Equalization, in consultation with the State Air Resources Board and the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, to submit a report to the Legislature, by January 1, 2012, regarding the fiscal effect of the imposition of the California vehicle tire fee. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/28/10 - Amended Assembly Current pdf May 28, 2010
- Amended 04/27/10 - Amended Assembly pdf April 27, 2010
- Amended 04/12/10 - Amended Assembly pdf April 12, 2010
- Introduced 02/17/10 - Introduced pdf February 17, 2010
- AB1981 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on EQ.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 63. Noes 9. Page 5508.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 19).
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Hill · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Hill
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 67 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 71 | 9 | 0 | 11 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 10% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Not Voting |
| V. | — | Not Voting |
| Manuel | — | Not Voting |
| Perez | — | Not Voting |
| Audra | — | Not Voting |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Not Voting |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Not Voting |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 72% | 28% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1981 do?
- (1) The California Tire Recycling Act requires a person who purchases a new tire to pay a California tire fee and the revenue generated from the fee is deposited in the California Tire Recycling Management Fund, for expenditure by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for programs related to the disposal of waste tires, except that a specified amount of the fee is designated for programs and projects that mitigate or remediate air pollution caused by waste tires. The tire fee is imposed upon, among other things, a new tire sold with a new or used motor vehicle, including the spare tire. Existing law authorizes the department to enter into a contract with the State Board of Equalization to collect the fee pursuant to the Fee Collection Procedures Law, which provides for criminal penalties for certain violations of that law. This bill would exclude, from the tire fee, a tire on a vehicle that is sold or leased by a new motor vehicle dealer. The bill would instead require a person who purchases or leases those vehicles to pay a California vehicle tire fee and would require the retail vehicle seller, as defined, to collect the California vehicle tire fee. The retail vehicle seller would be required to remit the fee, except as specified, to the state for deposit in the California Tire Recycling Management Fund. The bill would also make conforming changes with regard to the vehicle tire fee, including conforming changes to the Automobile Sales Finance Act. The bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating new crimes with regard to the collection of the California new vehicle tire fee. The bill would require the State Board of Equalization, in consultation with the State Air Resources Board and the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, to submit a report to the Legislature, by January 1, 2012, regarding the fiscal effect of the imposition of the California vehicle tire fee. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 1981?
- AB 1981 is sponsored by Hill.
- What is the current status of AB 1981?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1981?
- Track AB 1981 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1981
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1981
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →