Long-term care insurance.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 389 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 389.
You're tracking AB 389
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 389 — Long-term care insurance.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 101, Statutes of 2009.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 23, 2009. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law provides for regulation of insurers, including insurers issuing policies of long-term care insurance, by the Insurance Commissioner. Existing law requires benefits under individual long-term care insurance policies issued before new premium rate schedules are approved to be deemed reasonable in relation to premiums if the expected loss ratio is at least 60%, calculated in a manner that provides for adequate reserving of the risk. This bill, for policies issued before new premium rate schedules are approved and for which rate revisions are filed on or after January 1, 2010, would deem benefits reasonable in relation to premiums if the premium rate schedules have a lifetime expected loss ratio of at least 60% of the premium scale in effect on December 31, 2009, plus 70% of premium increases filed on or after January 1, 2010. The bill would, notwithstanding these provisions, authorize the commissioner, for rate increases filed on or after January 1, 2010, to approve an application for a rate revision based on less than a 70% loss ratio, but not less than a 60% loss ratio, for the portion attributable to the rate increase if an insurer can demonstrate that the rates are necessary to protect the financial condition of the insurer. Existing law requires actuaries used by the commissioner to review rate applications submitted by insurers relative to long-term care insurance, whether by employment or by contract, to be members of the American Academy of Actuaries with at least 5 years' relevant experience. This bill would revise these qualifications, as specified, and would make other technical changes.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 08/06/09 - Chaptered Current pdf August 06, 2009
- Enrolled 07/15/09 - Enrolled pdf July 15, 2009
- Amended 06/15/09 - Amended Senate pdf June 15, 2009
- Amended 05/18/09 - Amended Assembly pdf May 18, 2009
- Amended 04/30/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 30, 2009
- Amended 04/15/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 15, 2009
- Amended 04/13/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 13, 2009
- Introduced 02/23/09 - Introduced pdf February 23, 2009
- AB389 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 101, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 1 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 2490.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 1666.)
-
Ordered to Special Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 22).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B., F. & I.
-
Referred to Com. on B., F. & I.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1632.)
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (May 13).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 22).
-
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on INS. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on INS. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on INS.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Saldana · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Saldana
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 80 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 86 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Not Voting |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Not Voting |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Not Voting |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Ashburn | — | Not Voting |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cogdill | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 81 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 89 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Not Voting |
| Nava | — | Not Voting |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 389 do?
- Existing law provides for regulation of insurers, including insurers issuing policies of long-term care insurance, by the Insurance Commissioner. Existing law requires benefits under individual long-term care insurance policies issued before new premium rate schedules are approved to be deemed reasonable in relation to premiums if the expected loss ratio is at least 60%, calculated in a manner that provides for adequate reserving of the risk. This bill, for policies issued before new premium rate schedules are approved and for which rate revisions are filed on or after January 1, 2010, would deem benefits reasonable in relation to premiums if the premium rate schedules have a lifetime expected loss ratio of at least 60% of the premium scale in effect on December 31, 2009, plus 70% of premium increases filed on or after January 1, 2010. The bill would, notwithstanding these provisions, authorize the commissioner, for rate increases filed on or after January 1, 2010, to approve an application for a rate revision based on less than a 70% loss ratio, but not less than a 60% loss ratio, for the portion attributable to the rate increase if an insurer can demonstrate that the rates are necessary to protect the financial condition of the insurer. Existing law requires actuaries used by the commissioner to review rate applications submitted by insurers relative to long-term care insurance, whether by employment or by contract, to be members of the American Academy of Actuaries with at least 5 years' relevant experience. This bill would revise these qualifications, as specified, and would make other technical changes.
- Who sponsors AB 389?
- AB 389 is sponsored by Saldana.
- What is the current status of AB 389?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 23, 2009. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 389?
- Track AB 389 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 389
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 389
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →