California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 904 — Hunting: commercial hunting clubs.

Last action — From Assembly without further action.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law provides that a person in possession or control of property on or with respect to which a fee for the privilege of taking birds or mammals is imposed or collected, or on or with respect to which a fee for any type of entry or use permit that includes the privilege of taking birds or mammals on the property is imposed or collected, is maintaining a commercial hunting club if birds or mammals are taken on the property, and requires a person to procure a "commercial hunting club license" from the Department of Fish and Game before birds or mammals are taken. Existing law authorizes the department to issue a license to any person upon submission of a completed application and payment of a fee, in accordance with a fee schedule based on the number of properties used by the club, including a $1,000 fee for 6 to 10, inclusive, properties and a $2,000 fee for 11 or more properties. This bill would delete the fee category for 11 or more properties, and would revise the $1,000 fee category to apply to 6 or more properties.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Assembly without further action.

  2. Returned to Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

  3. Set, second hearing. Failed passage in committee.

  4. Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. Reconsideration granted.

  5. To Com. on W.,P. & W.

  6. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  7. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 3412.) To Assembly.

  8. To Special Consent Calendar.

  9. Read second time. To third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3334.)

  11. Set for hearing April 26.

  12. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3002.)

  14. Set for hearing March 23.

  15. To Com. on N.R. & W.

  16. From print. May be acted upon on or after February 27.

  17. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Hollingsworth · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Hollingsworth

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Failed 7 Yea · 7 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6603
Democratic 1100
Total 7703
% of votes cast 41%41%0%18%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Tom — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Yamada — Nay
Bonnie — Nay
Lowenthal — Nay
Salas — Nay
De — Not Voting
La — Not Voting
Torre — Not Voting
Anderson — Yea
Blumenfield — Nay
Huffman — Nay
Fuller — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Nay
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 2000
Unaffiliated 11003
Total 13003
% of votes cast 81%0%0%19%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Tom — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Salas — Yea
De — Not Voting
La — Not Voting
Torre — Not Voting
Huffman — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Failed 6 Yea · 7 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5603
Democratic 1100
Total 6703
% of votes cast 38%44%0%19%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Tom — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Bonnie — Nay
Lowenthal — Nay
Salas — Nay
De — Not Voting
La — Not Voting
Torre — Not Voting
Fuller — Yea
Blumenfield — Nay
Anderson — Yea
Huffman — Nay
Yamada — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Nay
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 35 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33003
Republican 1000
Democratic 1001
Total 35004
% of votes cast 90%0%0%10%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Harman — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Wiggins — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Not Voting
Ashburn — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Leno — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Not Voting
Walters — Yea
Wright — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9002
Total 9002
% of votes cast 82%0%0%18%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Cox — Yea
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 904 do?
Existing law provides that a person in possession or control of property on or with respect to which a fee for the privilege of taking birds or mammals is imposed or collected, or on or with respect to which a fee for any type of entry or use permit that includes the privilege of taking birds or mammals on the property is imposed or collected, is maintaining a commercial hunting club if birds or mammals are taken on the property, and requires a person to procure a "commercial hunting club license" from the Department of Fish and Game before birds or mammals are taken. Existing law authorizes the department to issue a license to any person upon submission of a completed application and payment of a fee, in accordance with a fee schedule based on the number of properties used by the club, including a $1,000 fee for 6 to 10, inclusive, properties and a $2,000 fee for 11 or more properties. This bill would delete the fee category for 11 or more properties, and would revise the $1,000 fee category to apply to 6 or more properties.
Who sponsors SB 904?
SB 904 is sponsored by Hollingsworth.
What is the current status of SB 904?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 904?
Track SB 904 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 904

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 904

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →