Audiologists: hearing aids.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1535 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1535.
You're tracking AB 1535
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1535 — Audiologists: hearing aids.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 309, Statutes of 2009.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2009. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Mixed recorded votes
9 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law, the Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists Licensure Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of audiologists by the Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology Board, defines the practice of audiology, and makes a violation of that act a crime. Under existing law, the board is comprised of 3 licensed speech-language pathologists, 3 licensed audiologists, and 3 public members. Existing law, the Hearing Aid Dispensers Licensing Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of hearing aid dispensers, who fit or sell hearing aids, by the Hearing Aid Dispensers Bureau. Existing law exempts audiologists and individuals supervised by audiologists from the hearing aid dispenser licensure requirement if those persons do not directly or indirectly engage in the sale or offering for sale of hearing aids. This bill would define the practice of audiology to include the selling of hearing aids and would also exempt audiologists from the hearing aid dispenser licensure requirements. However, the bill would prohibit a licensed audiologist from selling hearing aids unless he or she has completed an application for a dispensing audiologist certificate, paid all applicable fees, and passed a specified examination approved by the board. The bill would also make various provisions relating to the sale of hearing aids applicable to audiologists, such as, but not limited to, requiring hearing aids sold by catalog or direct mail to meet certain requirements, requiring a specified written receipt to be provided to a purchaser upon the sale of a hearing aid, and requiring specified records pertaining to the sale of a hearing aid to be maintained for 7 years. By making licensed audiologists subject to specified requirements relating to the sale of hearing aids, the violation of which would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also abolish the Hearing Aid Dispensers Bureau and would transfer the bureau's duties, powers, purposes, responsibilities, and jurisdiction over the licensing and regulation of hearing aid dispensers to the Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology Board, which would be renamed the Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology and Hearing Aid Dispensers Board. The bill would also provide for the transfer of funds from the Hearing Aid Dispensers Fund to the Hearing Aid Dispensers Account in the Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology Fund. Under the bill, the board would be comprised of 2 licensed speech-language pathologists, 2 licensed audiologists, one of whom shall be an audiologist that dispenses hearing aids, 2 licensed hearing aid dispensers, and 3 public members. The bill would create the Hearing Aid Dispensing Committee, comprised of specified board members, to review and research the practice of fitting or selling hearing aids and to advise the board about this practice. The bill would require the board, by January 1, 2011, to review specified license fees to assess whether there is adequate revenue to support the board's functions. The bill would make other conforming changes. The bill would incorporate additional changes to Sections 101 and 149 of the Business and Professions Code, proposed by AB 48 and SB 819, to be operative only if this bill and one or both of the other bills are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2010, and this bill is chaptered last. The bill would incorporate additional changes to Sections 2530.2, 3357, 3362, and 3456 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by both this bill and SB 821, to be operative only if SB 821 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2010, and this bill is chaptered last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/23/09 - Enrolled pdf September 23, 2009
- Amended 09/04/09 - Amended Senate pdf September 04, 2009
- Amended 09/02/09 - Amended Senate pdf September 02, 2009
- Amended 07/16/09 - Amended Senate pdf July 16, 2009
- Amended 07/09/09 - Amended Senate pdf July 09, 2009
- Amended 04/20/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 20, 2009
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
- AB1535 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 309, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 68. Noes 8. Page 3297.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 27. Noes 5. Page 2322.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read third time, amended. To second reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (August 27).
-
In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.
-
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (July 13).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
-
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 70. Noes 5. Page 1753.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (May 20).
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 28).
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Jones · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Jones
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 74 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 80 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 9% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Not Voting |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 28 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 12% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Benoit | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 18% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 4 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 36% | 27% | 0% | 36% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Not Voting |
| McLeod | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 74 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 82 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 5% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Gaines | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Not Voting |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Not Voting |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 14% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Not Voting |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 0% | 0% | 31% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| John | — | Not Voting |
| A. | — | Not Voting |
| Perez | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1535 do?
- Existing law, the Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists Licensure Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of audiologists by the Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology Board, defines the practice of audiology, and makes a violation of that act a crime. Under existing law, the board is comprised of 3 licensed speech-language pathologists, 3 licensed audiologists, and 3 public members. Existing law, the Hearing Aid Dispensers Licensing Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of hearing aid dispensers, who fit or sell hearing aids, by the Hearing Aid Dispensers Bureau. Existing law exempts audiologists and individuals supervised by audiologists from the hearing aid dispenser licensure requirement if those persons do not directly or indirectly engage in the sale or offering for sale of hearing aids. This bill would define the practice of audiology to include the selling of hearing aids and would also exempt audiologists from the hearing aid dispenser licensure requirements. However, the bill would prohibit a licensed audiologist from selling hearing aids unless he or she has completed an application for a dispensing audiologist certificate, paid all applicable fees, and passed a specified examination approved by the board. The bill would also make various provisions relating to the sale of hearing aids applicable to audiologists, such as, but not limited to, requiring hearing aids sold by catalog or direct mail to meet certain requirements, requiring a specified written receipt to be provided to a purchaser upon the sale of a hearing aid, and requiring specified records pertaining to the sale of a hearing aid to be maintained for 7 years. By making licensed audiologists subject to specified requirements relating to the sale of hearing aids, the violation of which would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also abolish the Hearing Aid Dispensers Bureau and would transfer the bureau's duties, powers, purposes, responsibilities, and jurisdiction over the licensing and regulation of hearing aid dispensers to the Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology Board, which would be renamed the Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology and Hearing Aid Dispensers Board. The bill would also provide for the transfer of funds from the Hearing Aid Dispensers Fund to the Hearing Aid Dispensers Account in the Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology Fund. Under the bill, the board would be comprised of 2 licensed speech-language pathologists, 2 licensed audiologists, one of whom shall be an audiologist that dispenses hearing aids, 2 licensed hearing aid dispensers, and 3 public members. The bill would create the Hearing Aid Dispensing Committee, comprised of specified board members, to review and research the practice of fitting or selling hearing aids and to advise the board about this practice. The bill would require the board, by January 1, 2011, to review specified license fees to assess whether there is adequate revenue to support the board's functions. The bill would make other conforming changes. The bill would incorporate additional changes to Sections 101 and 149 of the Business and Professions Code, proposed by AB 48 and SB 819, to be operative only if this bill and one or both of the other bills are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2010, and this bill is chaptered last. The bill would incorporate additional changes to Sections 2530.2, 3357, 3362, and 3456 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by both this bill and SB 821, to be operative only if SB 821 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2010, and this bill is chaptered last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 1535?
- AB 1535 is sponsored by Jones.
- What is the current status of AB 1535?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2009. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1535?
- Track AB 1535 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1535
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1535
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →