California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 1706 — Infrastructure financing districts: City and County of San Francisco.

Last action — From Senate committee without further action.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law specifically authorizes the City and County of San Francisco to create infrastructure financing districts, adopt infrastructure financing plans for those districts, and issue bonds financed by projected increases in ad valorem property taxes to fund certain public facilities, pursuant to a specified procedure. Existing property tax law establishes various procedures and requirements with respect to the annual apportionment and allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, including increased revenues from infrastructure financing districts. This bill would recast these provisions authorizing the City and County of San Francisco to create infrastructure financing districts that include specified waterfront property. This bill would also modify the procedures for San Francisco to adopt an infrastructure financing plan, and allocate projected increases in ad valorem property taxes to specified annual apportionments. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City and County of San Francisco. This bill would provide that certain provisions of Chapter 664 of the Statutes of 2010 not become operative if specified conditions occur. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Senate committee without further action.

  2. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  3. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  4. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  5. (Page 5010.)

  6. Senate Rule 29.3(b) suspended.

  7. Read second time. To third reading.

  8. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 29).

  9. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  10. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  11. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 44. Noes 28. Page 5427.)

  12. Reconsideration granted. (Ayes 46. Noes 26. Page 5421.)

  13. Motion to reconsider made by Assembly Member Ammiano.

  14. Read third time, passage refused. (Ayes 38. Noes 30. Page 4816.)

  15. Read second time. To third reading.

  16. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (March 16).

  17. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  18. From printer. May be heard in committee March 4.

  19. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Ammiano · Primary
  • Hill · Cosponsor
  • Leno · Cosponsor
  • Ma · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Ammiano

Co-sponsors (3)

  • Hill
  • Leno
  • Ma

Not signed on (118)

118 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 118 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Do pass.

Passed 5 Yea · 1 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5101
Total 5101
% of votes cast 71%14%0%14%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Hancock — Yea
Cogdill — Not Voting
Huff — Nay
Leno — Yea
Wright — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Cedillo — Yea

Official roll call →

AB 1706 AMMIANO Assembly Third Reading

Passed 53 Yea · 29 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 502807
Democratic 2001
Republican 1101
Total 532909
% of votes cast 58%32%0%10%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Charles — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Bass — Yea
Beall — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Monning — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Bill — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Portantino — Nay
Tom — Not Voting
Audra — Not Voting
Fuller — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Gilmore — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Conway — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Knight — Nay
Lieu — Nay
Logue — Nay
Nava — Not Voting
Nestande — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Cook — Nay
DeVore — Nay
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Not Voting
Tran — Nay
Villines — Nay
Adams — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Ma — Yea
Miller — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Yea
Solorio — Not Voting
Torlakson — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Eng — Yea
Fuentes — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

AB 1706 AMMIANO Motion to Reconsider

Passed 55 Yea · 27 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 522607
Republican 1101
Democratic 2001
Total 552709
% of votes cast 60%30%0%10%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Adams — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Gilmore — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Lieu — Not Voting
Miller — Nay
Nava — Not Voting
Nestande — Nay
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Solorio — Not Voting
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Nay
Villines — Nay
Yamada — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Bill — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Tom — Not Voting
Portantino — Not Voting
Audra — Not Voting
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Charles — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Bass — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Norby — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Huber — Yea
Knight — Nay
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Eng — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

AB 1706 AMMIANO Assembly Third Reading

Failed 47 Yea · 33 Nay · 11 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 453109
Democratic 1002
Republican 1200
Total 4733011
% of votes cast 52%36%0%12%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Eng — Yea
Charles — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Garrick — Nay
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Bill — Nay
Tom — Nay
Gilmore — Nay
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Ma — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Coto — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Norby — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Portantino — Nay
Audra — Nay
Galgiani — Not Voting
Hagman — Nay
Blumenfield — Not Voting
Huber — Not Voting
Knight — Nay
Miller — Nay
Nava — Not Voting
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Villines — Nay
Adams — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Not Voting
Block — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Not Voting
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Not Voting
Jeffries — Nay
Lieu — Nay
Logue — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Not Voting
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Not Voting
Tran — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Not Voting
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 4 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4200
Total 4200
% of votes cast 67%33%0%0%
How each member voted (6)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Nay
Gilmore — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Hill — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Furutani — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

taxation housing transportation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1706 do?
Existing law specifically authorizes the City and County of San Francisco to create infrastructure financing districts, adopt infrastructure financing plans for those districts, and issue bonds financed by projected increases in ad valorem property taxes to fund certain public facilities, pursuant to a specified procedure. Existing property tax law establishes various procedures and requirements with respect to the annual apportionment and allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, including increased revenues from infrastructure financing districts. This bill would recast these provisions authorizing the City and County of San Francisco to create infrastructure financing districts that include specified waterfront property. This bill would also modify the procedures for San Francisco to adopt an infrastructure financing plan, and allocate projected increases in ad valorem property taxes to specified annual apportionments. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City and County of San Francisco. This bill would provide that certain provisions of Chapter 664 of the Statutes of 2010 not become operative if specified conditions occur. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors AB 1706?
AB 1706 is sponsored by Ammiano, Hill, Leno, and Ma.
What is the current status of AB 1706?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1706?
Track AB 1706 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1706

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1706

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →