SB 1333 — Airports: avigation easements.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 329, Statutes of 2010.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The State Aeronautics Act governs the creation and operation of airports in this state. The act provides for the establishment of county airport land use commissions to carry out various requirements, including the formulation of a comprehensive land use compatibility plan to provide for the orderly growth of the airport and the area surrounding the airport within the jurisdiction of the commission, and to safeguard the general welfare of the inhabitants within the vicinity of the airport and the public in general. The act authorizes any person authorized to exercise the power of eminent domain for airport purposes to acquire by purchase, gift, devise, lease, condemnation, or otherwise airspace or an easement in airspace above the surface of property where necessary to permit imposition upon the property of excessive noise, vibration, discomfort, inconvenience, interference with use and enjoyment, and any consequent reduction in market value, due to the operation of aircraft to and from the airport. This bill would provide that if a political subdivision, as defined, conditions approval of a noise-sensitive project, as defined, upon the grant of an avigation easement, as defined, to the owner or operator of an airport, the avigation easement shall be required to be granted to the owner or operator of the airport prior to the issuance of the building permit that allows construction or reconstruction of the noise-sensitive project. The bill would require that the avigation easement include a termination clause that operates to terminate the avigation easement if the noise-sensitive project is not built and the permit or any permit extension authorizing construction or reconstruction has expired or has been revoked. The bill would require the political subdivision that issued the permit to notify the owner or operator of the airport of the expiration or revocation of the permit within 30 days of its expiration or revocation. The bill would require the owner or operator of the airport to record a notice of termination with the county recorder of the county where the property is located within 90 days after receipt of the notice from the political subdivision, and to provide the political subdivision with proof of filing of the notice of termination within 30 days of it being recorded. By requiring a political subdivision to provide notice of the expiration or revocation of the permit to the owner or operator of an airport and by requiring the recording of a notice of termination, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/27/10 - Chaptered Current pdf September 27, 2010
- Enrolled 08/13/10 - Enrolled pdf August 13, 2010
- Amended 05/17/10 - Amended Senate pdf May 17, 2010
- Amended 04/26/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 26, 2010
- Amended 04/12/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 12, 2010
- Introduced 02/19/10 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2010
- SB1333 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 329, Statutes of 2010.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 2 p.m.
-
In Senate. To enrollment.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6180.) To Senate.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
(Heard in committee on August 4.)
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
-
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
To Com. on L. GOV.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 32. Noes 0. Page 3584.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3499.)
-
Set for hearing May 10.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3307.)
-
Set for hearing April 19.
-
Joint Rule 61(a) file notice suspended. (Page 3209.)
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
To Com. on RLS.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 23.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Yee · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Yee
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 84 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 30 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1333 do?
- The State Aeronautics Act governs the creation and operation of airports in this state. The act provides for the establishment of county airport land use commissions to carry out various requirements, including the formulation of a comprehensive land use compatibility plan to provide for the orderly growth of the airport and the area surrounding the airport within the jurisdiction of the commission, and to safeguard the general welfare of the inhabitants within the vicinity of the airport and the public in general. The act authorizes any person authorized to exercise the power of eminent domain for airport purposes to acquire by purchase, gift, devise, lease, condemnation, or otherwise airspace or an easement in airspace above the surface of property where necessary to permit imposition upon the property of excessive noise, vibration, discomfort, inconvenience, interference with use and enjoyment, and any consequent reduction in market value, due to the operation of aircraft to and from the airport. This bill would provide that if a political subdivision, as defined, conditions approval of a noise-sensitive project, as defined, upon the grant of an avigation easement, as defined, to the owner or operator of an airport, the avigation easement shall be required to be granted to the owner or operator of the airport prior to the issuance of the building permit that allows construction or reconstruction of the noise-sensitive project. The bill would require that the avigation easement include a termination clause that operates to terminate the avigation easement if the noise-sensitive project is not built and the permit or any permit extension authorizing construction or reconstruction has expired or has been revoked. The bill would require the political subdivision that issued the permit to notify the owner or operator of the airport of the expiration or revocation of the permit within 30 days of its expiration or revocation. The bill would require the owner or operator of the airport to record a notice of termination with the county recorder of the county where the property is located within 90 days after receipt of the notice from the political subdivision, and to provide the political subdivision with proof of filing of the notice of termination within 30 days of it being recorded. By requiring a political subdivision to provide notice of the expiration or revocation of the permit to the owner or operator of an airport and by requiring the recording of a notice of termination, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
- Who sponsors SB 1333?
- SB 1333 is sponsored by Yee.
- What is the current status of SB 1333?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1333?
- Track SB 1333 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1333
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1333
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →