California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 1333 — Airports: avigation easements.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 329, Statutes of 2010.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

The State Aeronautics Act governs the creation and operation of airports in this state. The act provides for the establishment of county airport land use commissions to carry out various requirements, including the formulation of a comprehensive land use compatibility plan to provide for the orderly growth of the airport and the area surrounding the airport within the jurisdiction of the commission, and to safeguard the general welfare of the inhabitants within the vicinity of the airport and the public in general. The act authorizes any person authorized to exercise the power of eminent domain for airport purposes to acquire by purchase, gift, devise, lease, condemnation, or otherwise airspace or an easement in airspace above the surface of property where necessary to permit imposition upon the property of excessive noise, vibration, discomfort, inconvenience, interference with use and enjoyment, and any consequent reduction in market value, due to the operation of aircraft to and from the airport. This bill would provide that if a political subdivision, as defined, conditions approval of a noise-sensitive project, as defined, upon the grant of an avigation easement, as defined, to the owner or operator of an airport, the avigation easement shall be required to be granted to the owner or operator of the airport prior to the issuance of the building permit that allows construction or reconstruction of the noise-sensitive project. The bill would require that the avigation easement include a termination clause that operates to terminate the avigation easement if the noise-sensitive project is not built and the permit or any permit extension authorizing construction or reconstruction has expired or has been revoked. The bill would require the political subdivision that issued the permit to notify the owner or operator of the airport of the expiration or revocation of the permit within 30 days of its expiration or revocation. The bill would require the owner or operator of the airport to record a notice of termination with the county recorder of the county where the property is located within 90 days after receipt of the notice from the political subdivision, and to provide the political subdivision with proof of filing of the notice of termination within 30 days of it being recorded. By requiring a political subdivision to provide notice of the expiration or revocation of the permit to the owner or operator of an airport and by requiring the recording of a notice of termination, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 329, Statutes of 2010.

  2. Approved by Governor.

  3. Enrolled. To Governor at 2 p.m.

  4. In Senate. To enrollment.

  5. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6180.) To Senate.

  6. Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

  7. (Heard in committee on August 4.)

  8. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)

  9. (Heard in committee on June 30.)

  10. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. To Com. on L. GOV.

  12. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  13. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 32. Noes 0. Page 3584.) To Assembly.

  14. Read second time. Amended. To third reading.

  15. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3499.)

  16. Set for hearing May 10.

  17. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  18. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3307.)

  19. Set for hearing April 19.

  20. Joint Rule 61(a) file notice suspended. (Page 3209.)

  21. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  22. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  23. To Com. on RLS.

  24. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 23.

  25. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Yee · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Yee

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 90 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 84001
Democratic 3000
Republican 3000
Total 90001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Bill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Norby — Not Voting
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Villines — Yea
Adams — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Tran — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 19 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 18000
Democratic 1000
Total 19000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Conway — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Miller — Yea
Norby — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 33 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 30006
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 33006
% of votes cast 85%0%0%15%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Florez — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Cogdill — Not Voting
Oropeza — Not Voting
Price — Not Voting
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Not Voting
Wiggins — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Huff — Yea
Walters — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9002
Total 9002
% of votes cast 82%0%0%18%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Not Voting
Cox — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Denham — Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1333 do?
The State Aeronautics Act governs the creation and operation of airports in this state. The act provides for the establishment of county airport land use commissions to carry out various requirements, including the formulation of a comprehensive land use compatibility plan to provide for the orderly growth of the airport and the area surrounding the airport within the jurisdiction of the commission, and to safeguard the general welfare of the inhabitants within the vicinity of the airport and the public in general. The act authorizes any person authorized to exercise the power of eminent domain for airport purposes to acquire by purchase, gift, devise, lease, condemnation, or otherwise airspace or an easement in airspace above the surface of property where necessary to permit imposition upon the property of excessive noise, vibration, discomfort, inconvenience, interference with use and enjoyment, and any consequent reduction in market value, due to the operation of aircraft to and from the airport. This bill would provide that if a political subdivision, as defined, conditions approval of a noise-sensitive project, as defined, upon the grant of an avigation easement, as defined, to the owner or operator of an airport, the avigation easement shall be required to be granted to the owner or operator of the airport prior to the issuance of the building permit that allows construction or reconstruction of the noise-sensitive project. The bill would require that the avigation easement include a termination clause that operates to terminate the avigation easement if the noise-sensitive project is not built and the permit or any permit extension authorizing construction or reconstruction has expired or has been revoked. The bill would require the political subdivision that issued the permit to notify the owner or operator of the airport of the expiration or revocation of the permit within 30 days of its expiration or revocation. The bill would require the owner or operator of the airport to record a notice of termination with the county recorder of the county where the property is located within 90 days after receipt of the notice from the political subdivision, and to provide the political subdivision with proof of filing of the notice of termination within 30 days of it being recorded. By requiring a political subdivision to provide notice of the expiration or revocation of the permit to the owner or operator of an airport and by requiring the recording of a notice of termination, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Who sponsors SB 1333?
SB 1333 is sponsored by Yee.
What is the current status of SB 1333?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1333?
Track SB 1333 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1333

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1333

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →