Parole: electronic monitoring.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1452 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1452.
You're tracking SB 1452
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1452 — Parole: electronic monitoring.
Last action — From Assembly without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to release a prisoner on a specified period of parole after the expiration of a specified term of imprisonment. Under existing law, the department is authorized to return a parolee to prison if the Board of Parole Hearings determines that the parolee violated the terms of his or her parole, as specified. Existing law prohibits the department from returning certain parolees to prison, placing a parole hold on the parolee, or reporting the parolee to the Board of Parole Hearings for a violation of parole, as specified. This bill would provide that a parolee to whom these limitations on the department are applicable may be required to wear an electronic monitoring device, for the duration of the parole period, by a local law enforcement agency that has primary jurisdiction over the location where the parolee resides and has been authorized by the department, in its discretion, to use global positioning system technology or otherwise monitor nonrevocable parolees. This bill would provide that any local law enforcement agency meeting those conditions shall, prior to any electronic monitoring of nonrevocable parolees, enter into a memorandum of understanding with the department, as specified, at the agency's expense. The bill would provide that the cost of acquiring, leasing, and monitoring an electronic monitoring device shall be the responsibility of the local law enforcement agency requiring the wearing of the device.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/24/10 - Amended Assembly Current pdf June 24, 2010
- Amended 06/16/10 - Amended Assembly pdf June 16, 2010
- Amended 05/04/10 - Amended Senate pdf May 04, 2010
- Amended 04/22/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 22, 2010
- Amended 03/23/10 - Amended Senate pdf March 23, 2010
- Introduced 02/19/10 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2010
- SB1452 View text html
Action History
-
From Assembly without further action.
-
From committee without further action.
-
Set, second hearing. Failed passage in committee. Reconsideration granted.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
To Com. on PUB. S.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 27. Noes 0. Page 3516.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3499.)
-
(May 4 amended version corrected May 6.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing May 10.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
-
Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3166.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Set for hearing April 13.
-
To Com. on PUB. S.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 23.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Runner · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Runner
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 43% | 57% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 27 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 0% | 0% | 31% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Not Voting |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| McLeod | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1452 do?
- Existing law requires the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to release a prisoner on a specified period of parole after the expiration of a specified term of imprisonment. Under existing law, the department is authorized to return a parolee to prison if the Board of Parole Hearings determines that the parolee violated the terms of his or her parole, as specified. Existing law prohibits the department from returning certain parolees to prison, placing a parole hold on the parolee, or reporting the parolee to the Board of Parole Hearings for a violation of parole, as specified. This bill would provide that a parolee to whom these limitations on the department are applicable may be required to wear an electronic monitoring device, for the duration of the parole period, by a local law enforcement agency that has primary jurisdiction over the location where the parolee resides and has been authorized by the department, in its discretion, to use global positioning system technology or otherwise monitor nonrevocable parolees. This bill would provide that any local law enforcement agency meeting those conditions shall, prior to any electronic monitoring of nonrevocable parolees, enter into a memorandum of understanding with the department, as specified, at the agency's expense. The bill would provide that the cost of acquiring, leasing, and monitoring an electronic monitoring device shall be the responsibility of the local law enforcement agency requiring the wearing of the device.
- Who sponsors SB 1452?
- SB 1452 is sponsored by Runner.
- What is the current status of SB 1452?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1452?
- Track SB 1452 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1452
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1452
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →