SB 110 — People with disabilities: victims of crime.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 617, Statutes of 2010.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law addresses aspects of the jurisdiction of state agencies and law enforcement in regard to long-term care facilities and elder and dependent adult abuse, as specified. This bill would further specify the jurisdiction of various state agencies and of law enforcement in regard to investigating those facilities and that conduct. Existing law regulates the investigation and prosecution of crimes against a dependent adult, which is defined to include a person who is between 18 and 64 years of age, inclusive, and who has a physical or mental limitation which restricts his or her ability, or substantially restricts his or her ability, to carry out normal activities or to protect his or her rights, including, but not limited to, a person who has a physical or developmental disability or whose physical or mental abilities have diminished, or significantly diminished, because of age. Under existing law, the term also includes any person between 18 and 64 years of age, inclusive, who is admitted as an inpatient to certain 24-hour health facilities. Existing law authorizes any county to establish an interagency elder death review team to assist local agencies in identifying and reviewing suspicious elder deaths and facilitating communications among persons who perform autopsies and persons involved in the investigation or reporting of elder abuse or neglect. Existing law establishes procedures for the sharing or disclosure of information by elder death review teams. This bill would rename these teams "elder and dependent adult death review teams" and would expand the authority of these teams to cover dependent adult death, abuse, and neglect, as specified. Existing law provides for the training of peace officers. This bill would require the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training and the Bureau of Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse to consult with each other and with other subject matter experts when producing new or updated training materials relating to elder and dependent adult abuse, as specified. Existing law provides for the creation of an advisory committee responsible for developing a course of training for district attorneys in the investigation and prosecution of sexual assault cases, child sexual exploitation cases, and child sexual abuse cases. Existing law requires that the courses shall include training in the unique emotional trauma experienced by victims of these crimes. Existing law requires that the committee shall consist of 11 members of which 6 shall be public members appointed by the Commission on the Status of Women, as specified. This bill would require that one of the appointees of the Commission on the Status of Women be an expert on crimes against persons with disabilities or other representative of the disability community, appointed as specified. Existing law provides that each county shall establish an emergency response adult protective services program that shall provide in-person response, 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, to reports of abuse of an elder or dependent adult, as specified. This bill would make technical changes to those provisions.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/30/10 - Chaptered Current pdf September 30, 2010
- Enrolled 08/23/10 - Enrolled pdf August 23, 2010
- Amended 08/02/10 - Amended Assembly pdf August 02, 2010
- Amended 06/23/10 - Amended Assembly pdf June 23, 2010
- Amended 06/16/10 - Amended Assembly pdf June 16, 2010
- Amended 01/26/10 - Amended Senate pdf January 26, 2010
- Amended 01/04/10 - Amended Senate pdf January 04, 2010
- Amended 05/05/09 - Amended Senate pdf May 05, 2009
- Amended 04/21/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 21, 2009
- Amended 03/25/09 - Amended Senate pdf March 25, 2009
- Introduced 01/28/09 - Introduced pdf January 28, 2009
- SB110 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 617, Statutes of 2010.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4644.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6177.) To Senate.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
(Heard in committee on August 4.)
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
(Heard in committee on June 15.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.)
-
To Coms. on PUB. S. and HUM. S.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 31. Noes 1. Page 2734.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 2693.)
-
(Suspense - for vote only.)
-
Set for hearing January 21.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set, first hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
-
(Suspense - for vote only.)
-
Set for hearing May 28.
-
Placed on APPR suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 18.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 704.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Set for hearing April 28.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Set for hearing April 14.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing March 31.
-
To Com. on PUB. S.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after February 28.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Cook · Cosponsor
- Hollingsworth · Cosponsor
- Liu · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Liu
Co-sponsors (2)
- Cook
- Hollingsworth
Not signed on (119)
119 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 119 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 84 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 30 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 32 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 3% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Not Voting |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 18% | 0% | 27% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 110 do?
- Existing law addresses aspects of the jurisdiction of state agencies and law enforcement in regard to long-term care facilities and elder and dependent adult abuse, as specified. This bill would further specify the jurisdiction of various state agencies and of law enforcement in regard to investigating those facilities and that conduct. Existing law regulates the investigation and prosecution of crimes against a dependent adult, which is defined to include a person who is between 18 and 64 years of age, inclusive, and who has a physical or mental limitation which restricts his or her ability, or substantially restricts his or her ability, to carry out normal activities or to protect his or her rights, including, but not limited to, a person who has a physical or developmental disability or whose physical or mental abilities have diminished, or significantly diminished, because of age. Under existing law, the term also includes any person between 18 and 64 years of age, inclusive, who is admitted as an inpatient to certain 24-hour health facilities. Existing law authorizes any county to establish an interagency elder death review team to assist local agencies in identifying and reviewing suspicious elder deaths and facilitating communications among persons who perform autopsies and persons involved in the investigation or reporting of elder abuse or neglect. Existing law establishes procedures for the sharing or disclosure of information by elder death review teams. This bill would rename these teams "elder and dependent adult death review teams" and would expand the authority of these teams to cover dependent adult death, abuse, and neglect, as specified. Existing law provides for the training of peace officers. This bill would require the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training and the Bureau of Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse to consult with each other and with other subject matter experts when producing new or updated training materials relating to elder and dependent adult abuse, as specified. Existing law provides for the creation of an advisory committee responsible for developing a course of training for district attorneys in the investigation and prosecution of sexual assault cases, child sexual exploitation cases, and child sexual abuse cases. Existing law requires that the courses shall include training in the unique emotional trauma experienced by victims of these crimes. Existing law requires that the committee shall consist of 11 members of which 6 shall be public members appointed by the Commission on the Status of Women, as specified. This bill would require that one of the appointees of the Commission on the Status of Women be an expert on crimes against persons with disabilities or other representative of the disability community, appointed as specified. Existing law provides that each county shall establish an emergency response adult protective services program that shall provide in-person response, 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, to reports of abuse of an elder or dependent adult, as specified. This bill would make technical changes to those provisions.
- Who sponsors SB 110?
- SB 110 is sponsored by Cook, Hollingsworth, and Liu.
- What is the current status of SB 110?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 110?
- Track SB 110 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 110
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 110
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →